Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Brisbane have been on SEN and are threatening legal action and accussing Essendn of draft tampering. This would tend to suggest that where there is smoke there is fire !
Surely it's only draft tampering if we approached Michael before he retired.
If Brisbane release him, I can't see they have a leg to stand on.
Surely it's only draft tampering if we approached Michael before he retired.
If Brisbane release him, I can't see they have a leg to stand on.
If he was out of contract, no problem. But he and Lions severed a contract part-way through to "retire", which would present the AFL with a conundrum. Would I be correct in saying this is a loophole which has not yet been tested? Do the AFL have the option of not registering the contract?
If he was out of contract, no problem. But he and Lions severed a contract part-way through to "retire", which would present the AFL with a conundrum. Would I be correct in saying this is a loophole which has not yet been tested? Do the AFL have the option of not registering the contract?
Sheedy said ages ago they were after a big name - if it was Michael- we are gone. I hope this doesn't cost us draft picks
Sheedy said ages ago they were after a big name - if it was Michael- we are gone. I hope this doesn't cost us draft picks
He said it in May. Michael wouldn't have even been on the radar then.
I doubt they could prove anything anyway, but the concept of players "retiring" mid-contract citing lack of desire/motivation, then being drafted somewhere else is all a bit dodgy. A bit like in the NRL with the Steve Turner/Gold Coast Titans business ATM, I don't imagine the AFL would be entirely happy with the notion.
Did he write us off after 8 games ?
Did he write us off after 8 games ?
Actually nothing like it. Turner agreed to terms with the GC and then changed his mind and wanted to stay simply because he was getting a game in first grade. He has stated he agreed to go to the GC because he wasnt in first grade with Melbourne and he thought he could be playing first grade with the Titans. But none of this is really relevant for this board other than to say it is completly different to the Mal Micheal case.
Have you worked out what you are going to whinge about when Sheeds is gone in 2008?
I meant more with the option of the AFL not registering the contract. Surely anyone can see the potential minefield this opens up. What would you think if Dempsey had up and left citing homsickness and just wanting to play footy with his mates, then signed with us, then signed with us in the PSD (yeah big hypothetical I know)?
I doubt we wouldn't have released him from his contract.
Once you release a bloke, regardless of the reason, I don't know what the AFL can do unless there is proof that Essendon forced Michael's hand towards retirement. I don't believe that is the case here.
Regardless Brisbane would be pissed. Imagine a few twists and turns in this story to come wether the Lions have a leg to stand on or not.