Malceski for Spida?????????

[smasher]

I wasn't impressed when I read in todays Age newspaper that Hawthorn would only look at a young player as in Malceski or a high draft pick for Spida.I don't think so!!!!!!

 

[natlovestheswans]

Malceski.. hell no. That boy isn't going anywhere. None of the 22 boys who played on Saturday are going anywhere.

 

[swans12]

If we let Malceski go, they'd better let ASDA loose in the office as the recruitment staff would have to be on drugs.

This kid has had all the development work put into him for what? To pass that on to someone else, dreaming (hopefully)

 

[Tuco]

Don't worry. It won't happen. Mal would be a required player by now. And I seriously doubt that Roos would back down and offer the hawks higher than 3rd pick.

They might, however, get a young player who isn't likely to to be in the senior group on a regular basis any time soon.

 

[natlovestheswans]

Don't worry. It won't happen. Mal would be a required player by now. And I seriously doubt that Roos would back down and offer the hawks higher than 3rd pick.

They might, however, get a young player who isn't likely to to be in the senior group on a regular basis any time soon.

Like who?

 

[bigswan]

Willoughby, Schmidt, Moore or Spriggs. Nothing more.

 

[Philhawk]

I'm not even sure if the Swans would consider this, but i'll throw it up anyway.


Spida + Pick 24 ------> Swans


Pick 15 ----> Carlton


Bret Thornton -----> Hawks


Just a thought.

 

[Francis30]

I'm not even sure if the Swans would consider this, but i'll throw it up anyway.


Spida + Pick 24 ------> Swans


Pick 15 ----> Carlton


Bret Thornton -----> Hawks


Just a thought.

Malceski is a no go zone for other clubs and I would hate it if they draft him for an older player

 

[Francis30]

Willoughby, Schmidt, Moore or Spriggs. Nothing more.

I would hate it if Jarrad Moore was traded for Everitt.

Forget about trading young players Sydney trade someone like Ben Mathews.

 

[skipper kelly]

Not a chance in hell.

 

[Bennycoff]

We don't want fringe players. It's going to be a second rounder otherwise Sydney won't get him, harsh but true.

 

[Thaihawk]

Willoughby, Schmidt, Moore or Spriggs. Nothing more.

Would the swans consider sending one of the above players to Carlton if they received Spida?

The Hawks could then give Carlton pick 24, and THornton would move to Hawthorn.

IMO no club loses, but the Hawks gain!

 

[is2SWaNz]

no, no and a no!

Malceski stays here.

 

[LOBBY007]

we have finally got it right. Jolly is already a premiership ruckman(how could he be focused after his wife gave birth) and now that Doyle is fit he will only get better.leave spida at hawthorn to get stuck in his own web of deceit. we don't need him as a ruckman didn't cost us a premiership.

 

[Altum Volantes]

we don't need him as a ruckman didn't cost us a premiership.

Are you kidding? Jolly and Doyle 'Gardinered' you guys!

 

[Ed_Gein]

Moore? He just signed a new 3 year deal with the Swans. What would be the point in that if we were to trade him off to the Hawks?

 

[Bennycoff]

Your ruck is quite weak.

 

[Bennycoff]

Moore? He just signed a new 3 year deal with the Swans. What would be the point in that if we were to trade him off to the Hawks?

Wouldn't worry we wouldn't be interested in fringe players. Its only draft picks.

 

[Ed_Gein]

Wouldn't worry we wouldn't be interested in fringe players. Its only draft picks.

I gather from what Roos said that our 1st and 2nd round picks are off limits. Willing to settle for a 3rd round?

 

[Blacky]

What a joke this would be...
How can a guy who missed most of the season and has 2 years in him max, be worth a player of Malceski's potential!
I would be almost as annoyed if we trade our first rounder this year too!

 

[Oscar]

I agree Malceski is a player I wouldn't trade, however if the Hawks want one of our best 22 then a deal that could satisfy would be:

everitt + pick 6 for pick 15 + buchanan

Yes we would be giving up a young preimership player but one that could possibly be replaced by a Moore, Schmidt or Willoughby.
Also just think of the possible player that pick 6 might get us

You need to give up quality to get quality!

 

[BrissoMash]

everitt + pick 6 for pick 15 + buchanan

NOW we're talking!!!! DO IT!

 

[skipper kelly]

I agree Malceski is a player I wouldn't trade, however if the Hawks want one of our best 22 then a deal that could satisfy would be:

everitt + pick 6 for pick 15 + buchanan

Yes we would be giving up a young preimership player but one that could possibly be replaced by a Moore, Schmidt or Willoughby.
Also just think of the possible player that pick 6 might get us

You need to give up quality to get quality!

no..

 

[CharlieG]

Relax guys. Unless they request a move, neither Buchanan nor Malceski will be traded.

 

[SWANNIES RULE]

I actually think Oscar's suggestion is worth considering. Pick 6 would mean we would pick up one of the premier youngsters in the country.