Remove this Banner Ad

Current Man from high-profile Victorian AFL family found guilty of rape *Name suppressed

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Is it likely the suppression order will be fought? Or will it remain in place ongoing now?

The press will be fighting hard to have the suppression orders lifted and given the conviction, I'm thinking they're probably not going to hold for much longer.
 
Both parents are well known, when the first court hearing was done virtually, dad logged in with his camera and name on 🤦

After that, the lawyers came hard with suppression orders which I assume will get lifted soon.
All a bit BS
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

This supression order is favourtism to a well known family. It needs to be lifted. It was meant to be lifted after the trial.
As far as jail time goes , I can see him getting only 6 to 12 months in prison with the rest of the sentence served some other way.
 
The guy seems to have lied to everyone and dug his own grave. I know there are minimum sentences for rape in vic but I think there should be some discount for pleading guilty. By the same token the guy should get a similar sentence to a murderer now as there is no remorse, no mitigating circumstances
 
How exactly do you doctor someones uber receipt unless you have access to their phone?
This is very confusing. Also if an uber was cancelled that appears on a receipt.
Not sure if this was covered in trial or just omitted from the reports.
Were the uber drivers called to testify?
The timeline would be easy to verify.
 
Last edited:
Did the boyfriend of the victim give evidence?
They all gave evidence apparently.
Why can't the judge intervene and get a bench warrant for ubers data?
How many ubers were called at what time and were any cancelled?
Why did the other guy the friend give over his phone to enable the receipt to be doctored? (Supposedly after (supressed name)was confronted by his gf with the accusations?) When did this doctoring take place?
If (suppressed name) ordered the uber himself for the friend thus enabling the quickly doctored receipt why couldn't the friend order his own? And this would've necessitated going back and foward between rooms?
Now all this may have been covered and the media has not provided details otherwise the judge should question and take an active role.
The reporting and timeline on this is very disjointed
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

One of the major news outlets showed some footage of the couple leaving the County Court apparently but their images since seem to be blurred. This is how their names have appeared to surface among the wider public more recently.

Regardless, we need to engage within the confines of law and their names can't go up in here.
 
This supression order is favourtism to a well known family. It needs to be lifted. It was meant to be lifted after the trial.
As far as jail time goes , I can see him getting only 6 to 12 months in prison with the rest of the sentence served some other way.
I thought a standard sentence for this type of crime in Victoria was ten years.

The favouritism is morally bankrupt, clearing the court so the parents could spend time together... wouldnt happen if it was just another punter... justice should be applied equally.
 
Last edited:
if the judge gives him like under 3yrs, surely the DPP would appeal and try to get a 8-9 yrs custodial sentence, given the lack of remorse, consistent lying under oath and the standard practice to start at 10 yrs and work down 😩
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Man from high-profile Victorian AFL family found guilty of rape *Name suppressed

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top