Moved Thread maximum Discrepant Anomalies In Coach OpinionS Index(D.A.I.C.Os index)

[Meteoric Rise]

Rusey is a shit stirrer mate. No use trying to talk sense to him.

That is where you are wrong Chron. It has been very helpful for Heafy to take the time to help me to understand that the 92 million to 1 run of negative free kick results we have received over the last 8 years could not possibly result from biased umpiring. It is so good to learn I am clueless for not ruling out bias as a possible cause way before now. But it is ok, cos Daicos got a little bit of extra attention in one half of footy, that is a way bigger issue.

 

[HeathySure]

Well if you care about the right frees being given I under-estimated your reaction to the umpires if you were a Tiger supporter. You wouldn't be mass murderous so much, more genocidal I would say. At least. And given you have proven you are unhinged by saying you care that the right frees are given and in the very next sentence you stated frees are over-rated, it is a bloody good thing for the races of the world you are a Collingwood supporter with their silver service umpiring, and not a Tiger supporter watching your team get awarded less frees than 17 other teams year after year after year.

But of course this couldn't be the result of any bias, it is simply that 17 other teams happen to play a lot more carefully when they play Richmond than when they play each other. Thanks for making sense of that for us Heafy.c

Cool story bro. Glad i could help

 

[Chronz]

92 million to 1 run of negative free kick results

Pleaae provide the mathematical equation you used to come up with that number.
Tuggball is the cause of those frees against.

 

[RCAB]

Richmond is really shit

You wouldn't trade 10 Richmond players for Daicos

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Pleaae provide the mathematical equation you used to come up with that number.
Tuggball is the cause of those frees against.

Haha, how did I just know it was you that would ask that most welcome question Chronz.

Well over the last 8 years, Richmond have been(not in this sequence but that doesn't matter) 18th, 18th, 18th, 18th, 18th, 17th, 15th, and amazingly as high 11th of 18 teams in free kicks for. So this is just simply isolating the free kicks the umpires award against the opposition to a given team - in this case Richmond.

So to finish 18th in a given season a team selected at random is a 17-1 shot, or an $18.0 shot in modern betting parlance.

To finish 17th(or in the bottom 2) that would be an 8-1 chance or a $9.0 shot.

To finish in the bottom 4(which the Tigers did in recording 15th position), this gets slightly more complex, but this is a 7-2 shot or $4.50.

And to finish in the bottom 8, which the Tigers did by finishing 11th in our 4 Yorkshiremen like lucky year, that is a 5-4 chance, or $2.25.

So to figure out the chances of a team at random getting as bad a run in an 8 year period as 5 x 18th, 1 x bottom 2, 1 x bottom 4 and 1 x bottom 8, you simply multiply all the individual season odds together.

You will find it comes out at just under 92,000,000 to 1. But as your Collingwood supporting friend has ruled out any form of bias, it must just be the other 17 clubs have had their 1 in 92 million sequence of high discipline occur when and only when they have played against the Tigers over the last 8 years. Bloody amazing.

 

[Meteoric Rise]

You wouldn't trade 10 Richmond players for Daicos

We wouldn't have 10 squibs on our list to make it a like for like trade.

 

[Chronz]

Haha, how did I just know it was you that would ask that most welcome question Chronz.

Well over the last 8 years, Richmond have been(not in this sequence but that doesn't matter) 18th, 18th, 18th, 18th, 18th, 17th, 15th, and amazingly as high 11th of 18 teams in free kicks for. So this is just simply isolating the free kicks the umpires award against the opposition to a given team - in this case Richmond.

So to finish 18th in a given season a team selected at random is a 17-1 shot, or an $18.0 shot in modern betting parlance.

To finish 17th(or in the bottom 2) that would be an 8-1 chance or a $9.0 shot.

To finish in the bottom 4(which the Tigers did in recording 15th position), this gets slightly more complex, but this is a 7-2 shot or $4.50.

And to finish in the bottom 8, which the Tigers did by finishing 11th in our 4 Yorkshiremen like lucky year, that is a 5-4 chance, or $2.25.

So to figure out the chances of a team at random getting as bad a run in an 8 year period as 5 x 18th, 1 x bottom 2, 1 x bottom 4 and 1 x bottom 8, you simply multiply all the individual season odds together.

You will find it comes out at just under 92,000,000 to 1. But as your Collingwood supporting friend has ruled out any form of bias, it must just be the other 17 clubs have had their 1 in 92 million sequence of high discipline occur when and only when they have played against the Tigers over the last 8 years. Bloody amazing.

Everything checks out. Damn the CFL for these atrocities against Tuggerkind.