All week the topic has revolved around the traibunal appearance and suspension of Collingwood's vice captain, Anthony Rocca.
Did anyone find it extremely interesting that the issue of his suspension was not discussed AT ALL last night ont he footy show? Brief mention was made about how they'll replace him, but that's it.
Any other player from the other 15 clubs in the competition would've been heavily scrutinised by McGuire, Newman and Co., but due to it being a Collingwood player... the entire group were censored.
No mention of what they thought of the decision at all, whether the decision was just or unreasonable... is this McGuires way of stating that the decision was fair? I'd suggest not, because the first excuse that will come out of that triple-chinned pr*ck on Monday (if) they lose will be the fact they were gutted by the tribunal.
I was sincerely hoping for a Collingwood victory tomorrow... now l can't wait for the Lions to get up so that l can see McGuires reaction. Anyone that suggests there is no conflict of interest there is derranged!
Did anyone find it extremely interesting that the issue of his suspension was not discussed AT ALL last night ont he footy show? Brief mention was made about how they'll replace him, but that's it.
Any other player from the other 15 clubs in the competition would've been heavily scrutinised by McGuire, Newman and Co., but due to it being a Collingwood player... the entire group were censored.
No mention of what they thought of the decision at all, whether the decision was just or unreasonable... is this McGuires way of stating that the decision was fair? I'd suggest not, because the first excuse that will come out of that triple-chinned pr*ck on Monday (if) they lose will be the fact they were gutted by the tribunal.
I was sincerely hoping for a Collingwood victory tomorrow... now l can't wait for the Lions to get up so that l can see McGuires reaction. Anyone that suggests there is no conflict of interest there is derranged!



