Remove this Banner Ad

Conspiracy Theory MH17 shot down by Multiple High energy objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter nut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

nut

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Mar 16, 2002
Posts
25,265
Reaction score
17,280
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Richmond
The Russians released a report suggesting the high energy objects were most likely from cannon fire. The only evidence our side can come up with is, the Russians are lying. There was radar of a military jet in the vicinity, first it was denied. When that was no longer possible, western press say it was of a variety that can't fly high enough.That has been debunked.


Everything the west say is hear say, innuendo ect.The west have no evidence whatsoever. The west signed an agreement not to release details of the final report, when it becomes available in a few years time.

It doesn't matter what actually happened anymore, it only matters that the west(us) have used this for political gain and propaganda purposes.That is the only facts we have out of this whole sorry and tragic episode.
 
The Russians released a report suggesting the high energy objects were most likely from cannon fire. The only evidence our side can come up with is, the Russians are lying. There was radar of a military jet in the vicinity, first it was denied. When that was no longer possible, western press say it was of a variety that can't fly high enough.That has been debunked.


Everything the west say is hear say, innuendo ect.The west have no evidence whatsoever. The west signed an agreement not to release details of the final report, when it becomes available in a few years time.

It doesn't matter what actually happened anymore, it only matters that the west(us) have used this for political gain and propaganda purposes.That is the only facts we have out of this whole sorry and tragic episode.


It's fact now. This is the Dutch report.... Who order it to be shot down?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Did you notice they made no attempts to forensically examine the puncture marks. That evidence is damning. Shrapnel from a metal based Russian Buk is very different to shavings left from cannon fire from a jet and very different again from the porcelain shrapnel Ukrainian buks use.

Its the smoking gun. Western press will never release the findings as a result of suppression agreement signed.


What is of interest is the Russians believe they have radar of the jet allegedly responsible getting behind the stricken airliner after the cockpit was allegedly neutralized by cannon fire, firing a rocket in the rear so it falls out the sky and breaks up. Making it harder to determine what happened.

On Sept 11, allegedly there was various calls from passengers in those hijacked jets. If MH17 was hit by a buk at the front, there is no reason passengers at the back could not of made frantic emergency calls as the airliner fell from the sky. Unless of course the Russians are right and it was immediately hit again, by an air to air Missile.
 
On Sept 11, allegedly there was various calls from passengers in those hijacked jets. If MH17 was hit by a buk at the front, there is no reason passengers at the back could not of made frantic emergency calls as the airliner fell from the sky
There is every reason why they couldn't/wouldn't make a phone call as their plane plummets towards the ground
 
There is every reason why they couldn't/wouldn't make a phone call as their plane plummets towards the ground

that was definitely one of the most stupid assertions in this thread. yeah, as your plane disintegrates, you're going to get on your mobile while you sky dive the rest of the flight :confused:
 
You mean the official report?? that analysis?

NO. i mean what you have inferred from that analysis- that the attack was "orchestrated", that for some unknown reason ukraine should have sanctions placed on them, that the report somehow suggests that separatists didn't shoot the plane down :confused: (if that's not what you're trying to imply, my mistake).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Cannon fire.... The rebels don't have an airforce.
It dosen't say that it was shot down by an aircraft. Those same impacts can be consistent with the impact of a "proximity" warhead which can be fitted to the Russian BUK missile
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Multiple directions.... Both sides of fuselage..... Etc.
That's not consistent with a fighter jet then or are you saying multiple fighter jets had to shoot it down

Why don't we talk about the radio conversations that that those fine rebels had then

Igor Bezler: We have just shot down a plane. Group Minera. It fell down beyond Yenakievo.
 
058745-868aae3a-1e07-11e4-bf72-fc0acc2f37ad.jpg






Such a dangerous area ... too dangerous to investigate the crash site further.... look at the Rebels.
 
Wow. Just wow.
Hint: Find out what sort of missile a BUK (SA-11) is.
How does this misslie bring down an aircraft?


Does that explain holes in the roof from outside the plane???? and holes in the floor from inside the plane? was the plane upside down when the surface to air missile hit. Seems legit....lol.
 
It dosen't say that it was shot down by an aircraft. Those same impacts can be consistent with the impact of a "proximity" warhead which can be fitted to the Russian BUK missile
You would have to be blind or an imbecile to believe the mainstream garbage on this one. Do a little bit of investigation and it is clear that there are significant flaws in the bogus theory that this plane was downed by russian militants.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom