Michael Hibberd

[Great8]

What a load of garbage. Grievance tribunal incoming?

Nah, just a bit of bluff IMO.
A deal will be done that suits both parties if he does nominate Melbourne

 

[Zgope1]

That's an opinion, not a fact.

that it's bad for the game? that's a fact.

that Robbo admitted he "picked your side" on 360? fact.

 

[RearNaked]

Signed a contract after the asada shit broke

 

[LB#16]

that it's bad for the game? that's a fact.

that Robbo admitted he "picked your side" on 360? fact.

That would be classified as an opinion. Essendon being in the news is a fact, it being bad for the game is an opinion.

 

[Zgope1]

That would be classified as an opinion. Essendon being in the news is a fact, it being bad for the game is an opinion.

opinions to the contrary have no reason to support them

 

[LB#16]

opinions to the contrary have no reason to support them

I feel the Dogs winning the flag would be good for the game. Is that a fact? Pretty simple.

 

[Super Demon]

Essendon are merely posturing on this.

A deal will be sorted out very quickly come trade time.

 

[Zgope1]

I feel the Dogs winning the flag would be good for the game. Is that a fact? Pretty simple.

media picking sides and campaigning isn't good for the game. And people who's brains don't work think otherwise

 

[LB#16]

media picking sides and campaigning isn't good for the game. And people who's brains don't work think otherwise

The media publish stories they think will sell. During the drug saga they posted bad ones about Essendon, now they post good ones.

 

[Zgope1]

The media publish stories they think will sell. During the drug saga they posted bad ones about Essendon, now they post good ones.

your first sentence relates to the media- not the game. partial media--> shit for the game

your second sentence overlooks exactly what Robbo said. He picked the side that's not up for debate in your fact/opinion game

 

[LB#16]

your first sentence relates to the media- not the game. Impartial media--> shit for the game

your second sentence overlooks exactly what Robbo said. He picked the side that's not up for debate in your fact/opinion game

Positive Essendon talk being bad for the game is an opinion and a ridiculous one. The club was in deep and the media ran with that, now they've turning a new leaf and the media runs with this. People want to read about Essendon so they write about them to sell papers. You're point out Robbo as one person, a very small sample size and blowing it out of proportion.

 

[Zgope1]

Positive Essendon talk being bad for the game is an opinion and a ridiculous one. The club was in deep and the media ran with that, now they've turning a new leaf and the media runs with this. People want to read about Essendon so they write about them to sell papers. You're point out Robbo as one person, a very small sample size and blowing it out of proportion.

bolded is not what happened. A paper chief literally picked sides

 

[LB#16]

bolded is not what happened. A paper chief literally picked sides

At it again with the small sample size. You're ranting about something someone said in a newspaper that's got very little to do with the thread topic. Who cares?

 

[Choomah]

straight swap for harry lumumba

 

[Zgope1]

At it again with the small sample size. You're ranting about something someone said in a newspaper that's got very little to do with the thread topic. Who cares?

small sample size? or an admission?

anyhoo, similar to last year with Carlisle, superfooty is spitting out responses and bargaining moves on behalf of the bombers

 

[LeverPuller]

straight swap for harry lumumba

I was thinking for Melksham...

 

[LB#16]

small sample size? or an admission?

anyhoo, similar to last year with Carlisle, superfooty is spitting out responses and bargaining moves on behalf of the bombers

Don't like it, don't read it. I certainty don't read a lot of football media myself. But it has little impact on the game itself if any.

 

[Zgope1]

Don't like it, don't read it. I certainty don't read a lot of football media myself. But it has little impact on the game itself if any.

discourse around the game affects the game, continually.

I expressed that it's crap, nothing wrong with that. "don't like it, don't read it"

 

[Glen Buterol]

Hibberd is worth a pick around 40-50. First rounder? LOL

 

[Vindicater]

Hibberd is worth a pick around 40-50. First rounder? LOL

Haha.

 

[citizen-erased]

Hibberd is worth a pick around 40-50. First rounder? LOL

ontrade it for McCartin

 

[RearNaked]

Essendon are merely posturing on this.

A deal will be sorted out very quickly come trade time.

It wont come quick but a deal will be done

 

[WoWoohoo]

Nah, just a bit of bluff IMO.
A deal will be done that suits both parties if he does nominate Melbourne

By "picking" Essendon you mean throwing the 12 players under the bus by publishing their names?

 

[Choomah]

Hibberd is worth a pick around 40-50. First rounder? LOL

agree, hes a good old fashioned battler

 

[Gumby2Hurley]

ontrade it for McCartin

Nah would prefer lemon billingz