Remove this Banner Ad

Michael Jackson

  • Thread starter Thread starter BrisGirl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by JUBJUB
Very amusing.
Wacko claims the cops discolated his shoulder when they handcuffed him and now he can't raise his arms.

It probably wasn't a good idea for Wacko to wave both arms to the media when he left the police station.

Oops :o

Don't forget how the cops hit back with the video and audio they provided. To me that sounds more convincing than Jacko showing his bruised arms.
 
Originally posted by BluesBabe666
Hmmm, funny you mention that! Saw the pics of the bruises this morning.... as much as i think American police have a bit of a bad name, especially when it comes to men that interfere with children, i dont think they would risk it with the publicity that would be involved with this case. Not to mention the money (with which comes power) that MJ has... i think he did it to himself in an effort to gain sympathy.

I think he often plays the sympathy card with the public, ie his claim that his father abused him as a child.

I dont mean to appear unsympathetic but its always excuses. I act the way i do because i was abused, blah blah blah. Enough is enough of people playing the victim and always blaming circumstances which were forced upon them. Life is often crap, big deal. In a way its what we make it, and things only affect us the way we let them. The circle has to stop somewhere.

It will be interesting to see how his children turn out, whether they will be freaks of nature like him, or whether they will rise above this rubbish.

Guess what, if you were abused as a child then you can go ahead and commit some crimes and blame it on your 'tragic' childhood!
 
Originally posted by BluesBabe666
Hmmm, funny you mention that! Saw the pics of the bruises this morning.... as much as i think American police have a bit of a bad name, especially when it comes to men that interfere with children, i dont think they would risk it with the publicity that would be involved with this case. Not to mention the money (with which comes power) that MJ has... i think he did it to himself in an effort to gain sympathy.

I think he often plays the sympathy card with the public, ie his claim that his father abused him as a child.

I dont mean to appear unsympathetic but its always excuses. I act the way i do because i was abused, blah blah blah. Enough is enough of people playing the victim and always blaming circumstances which were forced upon them. Life is often crap, big deal. In a way its what we make it, and things only affect us the way we let them. The circle has to stop somewhere.

It will be interesting to see how his children turn out, whether they will be freaks of nature like him, or whether they will rise above this rubbish.

Yeah I was abused also. My dad always called me a little pryck but hey I grew into a big one.

Cheers

SJW

:) :) :)
 
Originally posted by EssJayW
Yeah I was abused also. My dad always called me a little pryck but hey I grew into a big one.

Cheers

SJW

:) :) :)

And if you cotinue with your current behaviour, you'll be abused some more. What the hell, I'll give you some gratuitous abuse anyway, just to keep our hands in, so to speak. You are a #$%^&*(^%ing $@%$#*. Ah, I feel better already. How was it for you?

BTW, is this reference to your growth spurt merely a free advertisement?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by skilts
And if you cotinue with your current behaviour, you'll be abused some more. What the hell, I'll give you some gratuitous abuse anyway, just to keep our hands in, so to speak. You are a #$%^&*(^%ing $@%$#*. Ah, I feel better already. How was it for you?

BTW, is this reference to your growth spurt merely a free advertisement?

Ahh. Just like the old days.


Yes.


I could never get anything past you Skilts.

Cheers, my friend

SJW

:) :) ;)
 
Originally posted by otaku
bloody hell - now he is doing the "my friend" crap....

Whats wrong 'O'. Do you know me or Skilts. I know Skilts from way back. It is just that he hasnt worked out who I am yet.

Cheers my fiend

SJW

:) :) :)
 
Originally posted by otaku
got nothing to do with my comment.

and you are a bit behind. fix your watch (or your calander...whichever)

You are fishing without bait.

Cheers my friend

SJW

:) :) :D
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by otaku
again - you are on the toatlly wrong track.

I was making a very definate statement - one that would be appreciated by a specific audience.

I dont know what you want me to say. I referred to a friend of mine as "my friend". I have told you this. What else do you want me to say. Do you want me to call you a name or something.

Cheers, my fiend

SJW

:) :) :)
 
Originally posted by EssJayW
I dont know what you want me to say. I referred to a friend of mine as "my friend". I have told you this. What else do you want me to say. Do you want me to call you a name or something.

again, you are on the wrong tack

i dont want you to say anything in particular. You seem to desire people to tell you what to post. But that is your choice.

I dont want you to call me a name or anything...see above paragraph.

As I have stated - my comment was directed at a particular audience. You wanna view it as fishing. you preogative. I will comment on anything you post that i think needs a comment.

what you do then is up to you
 
Originally posted by otaku
again, you are on the wrong tack

i dont want you to say anything in particular. You seem to desire people to tell you what to post. But that is your choice.

I dont want you to call me a name or anything...see above paragraph.

As I have stated - my comment was directed at a particular audience. You wanna view it as fishing. you preogative. I will comment on anything you post that i think needs a comment.

what you do then is up to you

Big O

I just find it courteous to respond when someone has quoted me, even if it only with a :)

Cheers

SJW

:) :) :)
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by BluesBabe666
Absolutely, dahls, abso-freakin-lutely!!!!
Vile, disgusting bubble blowing skeletal minger, that he is!!!! ;)
I think he loves u 2.But i agree a bit on what u say.
 
Originally posted by BrisGirl
The one thing I find sad in our society today, is how readily we 'the public' are quick to pass judgement and condemn people just on bare facts or what the media choose to let us know.

Now, with the Michael Jackson saga, we are again bombarded with media opinions and visions by both parties, asking us to make our own minds up.

I have now found the whole scene bizarre, as now we have the man - Michael Jackson - himself conducting interviews saying 'it is OK for men (who are not related to the boys) to have sleep-overs with little boys and this includes them sleeping in the man's bed because it is innocent and in fun - there is nothing wrong with it'.

My question to the main stream of the public, keeping his current charges out of this discussion, Is Michael Jackson being victimised or is it fundamentally wrong for men to conduct this behaviour, in the vein of it being innocent as he testifies?
he's a pediphile
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom