- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
- Posts
- 15,085
- Reaction score
- 55,979
- AFL Club
- Carlton
I’ve always struggled to asses people like Austin, i can see lots of draft misses, i see a lack of bringing in established players, i see a lack of fit for purpose mature recruits but what i dont know is, does he pick the players? If someone else is picking and ranking the players, then how does that affect how we view his role?
Once upon a time, I'd have said that he likely has less say in how the names are ranked than our scouts.
Nowadays, I'm less inclined to give him the out. He's a full time employee. He would likely spend a fair bit of time negotiating contracts with player managers, and would be run off his feet at trade and draft time with all the contingency planning and trade negotiations. But I'd find it very hard to believe he wouldn't have time throughout the year to watch plenty of tape, get along to plenty of games, and ensure he was verifying with his own eyes what the scouts were reporting.
A list manager should have their finger on the pulse regarding the current trends, the likely direction of the game moving forward, and by extension the needs of the list. If Voss says "I rate contest", Austin should be saying "I'll make it one of our considerations, but our analysis indicates we need players who bring traits A, B and C above all else".
So if Austin is in touch with the direction of the game, and is involved and invested in talent assessment, then the buck stops with him. And if he's not, then he's not doing the job.
This isn't to say every recruit needs to be a hit. Inevitable that 50% won't pan out, give or take, for a variety if reasons. So I think the target is something like 60% to be considered doing a really good job.






