Mick Malthouse article

[sante]

actually, they did bluff as on their end.

richmond were keen on roughhead, but not franklin - richmond were concerned with his mental test results - his attitude was a little less footy orientated than the other top 5's.


so they took roughead, knowing fully well the dogs were sold on Griff, and we were not keen on Franklin. They did bluff us in that sense. Dermie explained it on SEN on tuesday

I remember on Draft day, everyone was saying we bluffed them. Things change quickly.

 

[tigerT]

call me a fool but if i had a choice between judd and hodge i would take hodge for reasons that would take to long to explain.

Give it a shot

seconded, would love to hear the rationale behind it. I thought you had me when you said Pattison has shown more as a forward than Schulz but this trumps it i reckon?