-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Nathan J. Brown
- Thread starter Big_Tazz
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
reid is a bigger chance to debut, and a better dream team prospect
Saw Reid on Sunday. He is very skinny. He actually looked very lean which is a good sign in some ways. He looked athletic. I have my doubts he will do much this year which is fair enough from a forst year draftee. I don't expect much from draftees in year 1. Whatever you get is a bonus. Brown might have a stronger body but his inclusion depends as much as anything on injuries at least until/unless he shines for Willy.
If you want dream team first year players concentrate on the bottom few clubs and the very early picks – preferably midfielders who can form part of a clubs rotation and required marketing strategy.
If you want dream team first year players concentrate on the bottom few clubs and the very early picks – preferably midfielders who can form part of a clubs rotation and required marketing strategy.
Jabso
Brownlow Medallist
Brown is a crap dream team prospect. In fact most young key position players are let alone key defensive players. If he does get games, they will be low possesion, even if they are good games.
Reid is a bit better but still a risk.
However forget about dream team for a second I saw him at training today, training with most of the key defenders and he has some definate strength one on one, more than holding his own against Presti and Wakelin.
Reid is a bit better but still a risk.
However forget about dream team for a second I saw him at training today, training with most of the key defenders and he has some definate strength one on one, more than holding his own against Presti and Wakelin.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He was teamed up with Travis Cloke a few weeks ago as well. However, Travis would have gone easy on him as opposed to the Tarrant policy - Just ask John Anthony, I'm sure he hasn't forgotten about it, he was living his worst nightmare, Tarrant showed no remorse!!
Brown would be lucky to play a senior game at the moment, but so much could change over the course of the season... injuries etc.
NJ Brown
KPP
First-year player unlikely to get in with likes of Presti, Wakes, Jimmy and Nicky in the line before him, and most durable.
KPP
First-year player unlikely to get in with likes of Presti, Wakes, Jimmy and Nicky in the line before him, and most durable.
He'll be doing very well if he gets his career back on track after that sickening leg injury. Good choice to give him a second chance in the draft - raw talent.
Are you talking about the same Brown?
Also...pendles, i noticed on getty that under Pendles, a portrait pic of him was actually not him, was Dan Stanley...the same pic in your avatar...just checking if you knew
- Oct 8, 2004
- 13,088
- 5,909
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL
Maybe he's got him confused with Chris Dawes?
Yeah, true
The first part sounds like Nathan G. Brown...the second part sounds like anyone really...prob Dawes.
Confirmation pendles?
Are you talking about the same Brown?
Also...pendles, i noticed on getty that under Pendles, a portrait pic of him was actually not him, was Dan Stanley...the same pic in your avatar...just checking if you knew
Scott Pendlebury... a bull of a player.
Tarkyn_24
Okeydoke7 is [redacted]
- Dec 23, 2006
- 58,135
- 84,603
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
SC DT Board
Could be an interesting match up in the future with Nathan Brown a CHB and Mitch Brown a CHF.
- Oct 8, 2004
- 13,088
- 5,909
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL
I fail to see the likelihood that they're going to be much different, what with their identical DNA and all.
- Mar 25, 2007
- 816
- 0
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #17
There is only 3% DNA difference between humans and monkeys but I've never seen a monkey play football... except for Damien of course
Also Mitch is 7kgs heavier
- Oct 8, 2004
- 13,088
- 5,909
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL
A) You don't seem to understand how much difference 3% is. However, the Browns obviously aren't going to have any differences in terms of natural talent, are they?
B) Mitch Brown isn't 7kgs heavier. I don't know what your source for that is, but I'd imagine that Nathan Brown weighs somewhere in the vicinity of 92-93kgs now, and there's no way that Mitch is pushing the ton.
- Mar 25, 2007
- 816
- 0
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #19
I don't seem to understand when someone is having a bit of fun
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
If Nathan Brown is anything like his brother that debued last night for the eagles, we have a player on our hands.
Would good to see our Brown debut next week and play on his bro!
Would good to see our Brown debut next week and play on his bro!
- Mar 25, 2007
- 816
- 0
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #21
My source is CFC, they updated the age, height and weight of every single player a few days ago, he is listed at 87kgs. Now that is the same as his draft weight so one would hope you are right, but without another source you have to go with what the club says
http://collingwoodfc.com.au/Season2...layerId/15518/teamId/38/typeId/2/Default.aspx
Jabso
Brownlow Medallist
That is taken from draft measurements. Just about every player has put on weight. From reports Reid has put on 6kgs and is just over 90kgs but is listed at 84. I also think Travis Cloke is 196-197 not 195cm as he seems to be a bit taller than Rocca.
- Mar 25, 2007
- 816
- 0
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Banned
- #23
Well thats not good enough, I print it out every year and waited until they updated it the other day so I would have the latest attributes
- Oct 8, 2004
- 13,088
- 5,909
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Collingwood VFL
CFC have Travis Cloke's weight as 89kgs, which should give you an idea of how inaccurate they can be.
But even if you choose to judge based on that, West Coast only have Mitch Brown listed at 92kgs, which is only 5kgs more than Nathan on the official sites.
However, they aren't using the draft camp measurements, while Collingwood is. It's hard to imagine Nathan hasn't put on any weight since draft camp with a full pre-season of weights behind him.
