In the report it said that Balme would report to Kelly.
Ironically, it could be our desire to keep Kelly as Head of Football with Balme working under him as the reason he said no.
Imagine asking Neil Balme to report to Adam Kelly.
surely not
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
In the report it said that Balme would report to Kelly.
Ironically, it could be our desire to keep Kelly as Head of Football with Balme working under him as the reason he said no.
Imagine asking Neil Balme to report to Adam Kelly.
If any club had to deny every false story printed about them there would be press conferences almost every day of the year. I honestly think you were hoping this story was false so you could have a whinge about it, that seems to be your MO.It's not hard to deny a story that isn't true.
The club allowed a factually inaccurate story to run unchallenged
Multiple media outlets go with the story over the weekend, Crows don’t say a thing and never confirm anything. Balme says we approached, same as last year, but will stay at Richmond.
The usual whingers on here then start making up reasons why the club is at fault here zero factual basis, but don’t blame the media for running a false story, makes sense.
Well the first outlet to do so was 5AA.... So yes.So the media just came to this random conclusion all by themselves?
Sounds legit.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
They obviously heard we spoke to him, maybe couldn’t get anyone to confirm and then just assumed after last years approach that it was a foregone conclusion. In case you have been living under a rock, the media make up stories, this isn’t new.So the media just came to this random conclusion all by themselves?
Sounds legit.
You do know how the media works don't you. One says we are talking to Balme, then the next one add some spice, then the next one add some more spice.So the media just came to this random conclusion all by themselves?
Sounds legit.
Colour me surprised.Doesn't bother me that much, clearly people want to read more into it
Interestingly the last time Sam Edmund reported a scoop on us, it was about McAsey being desperate to leave..... A week before he signed his new deal.
How is this the club being a shot show?
Balme is contracted
We went after Balme and he decided to stay in Victoria where he has lived and fullfill his contract
If anyone is a sh*t show it's the media who got it wrong
You can't blame the club for having a crack at Balme while he is under contract
On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
There aren't that many major, consequential false stories.If any club had to deny every false story printed about them there would be press conferences almost every day of the year. I honestly think you were hoping this story was false so you could have a whinge about it, that seems to be your MO.
Your kidding?It's not hard to deny a story that isn't true.
The club allowed a factually inaccurate story to run unchallenged
Olsen...when you consider who we had in there before.People are fed up of us not nailing our appointments.
When was the last good appointment the club actually made? It's be a ******* shitshow for decades now.
They obviously heard we spoke to him, maybe couldn’t get anyone to confirm and then just assumed after last years approach that it was a foregone conclusion. In case you have been living under a rock, the media make up stories, this isn’t new.
Ah the supreme leader of the Crows board whingers!The story gained strength because we didn't deny it
There were whispers... Crows remained coy... Ricciuto crapped on on radio about an advisory role... things gather momentum.
Richmond probably upped their offer to him.Your kidding?
Honestly have people lost the plot
For years people have a cracked at the ub for not targeting the best
We target one of the best who is under contract, the media go off early and now it's the clubs fault
Hiw do we know that the club wasn't only just informed by Balme and his Manageement
Im all for holding the club to account but fu** me before we jump to throwing rocks lets get some information on time line first
On SM-G973F using BigFooty.com mobile app
How do you know that the CEO had an answer prior to today's interview with FiveaaThere aren't that many major, consequential false stories.
This was a major story involving a key position at our club. All we had to do is briefly say it's not true. That's it.
But no. Just like the camp story we have to let it fester to the point an opposition club embarasses us just moments after our CEO speaks to the media and doesn't bother telling the straight truth
Olsen...when you consider who we had in there before.
Well, we did talk to Balme so Silvers wasn't aware of his decision before his interviewed. Sure Balme told someone here on this forum but even we questioned how legit it was.Listen to the audio and the broader comments. Silvers could have knocked it on the head but left the door open. Could have just said it’s not happening. You’re allowed to say that guys contracted at other clubs won’t be coming to your club next year.
Im all for holding the club to account but
You're allowed to be disappointed with this, BACCSAh the supreme leader of the Crows board whingers!
Still an upgrade. I'm taking what I can get as a crows fan.Yeah we've upgraded from an atomic bomb to a sh*t sandwich.
Well this is embarrassing