- Apr 2, 2013
- 10,985
- 16,394
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Problem with the last paragraph is the defence called a witness who on the night said he saw Debs alone in the area. (Didn't come forward at the time as was known to police)My whole point is, how did Silk come to be shot with two bullets? Debs also stated that Roberts shot Silk. I mean, come on, Roberts was weighing up whether to admit to it or wait and go to jury and try his luck.
If you’re that innocent and know it then stand by your beliefs. Did the tampered evidence actually have anything to do directly with the fact he may have been there? And if there was a second perp, who was it? Debs stated, ‘Roberts shot Silk’ - is Debs just considered a liar now permanently?
So we are meant to dismiss that witness but believe Debs?