Remove this Banner Ad

News NWM stays at Saints (Will Faulkner wrong about being crows bound)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Christ mate. Tom Morris last night.

“There is no update” and then proceeds to make up some crap.

From our CEO


lol, wtf. Did the person who wrote that caption actually watch the video? He didn't sound remotely confident.

Ken Hinkley was speaking with more confidence than that about us keeping Dan Houston last year. And as we later found out that was after Dan had already confirmed to him privately that he was definitely going.
 
Still reckon he stays , maybe 2 yrs, think the hold off is the money and a point of pride. Im your best player but you wont pay me what your offering TDK to come to the club.
Port would have the same chances of trading for him then as they have now. He'd need to sign 4 years to be a resteicted free agent and if he truly does want to just get back to SA and other reasons then I highly doubt he'll want to remain for 4 more years just for RFA

Also knowing Saints and Vic's in general, if his trajectory from now to 2 years time they'll want triple what they are ranting on about now probably to the point of picks #1, #2, #3 and every player Port have 🤦
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Their panicking and if they think that by giving nas 1.4M x 2yrs is gonna get things done their kidding themselves especially when both SA Clubs are offering 2M x 8yrs to a homesick player wanting to return home.
2m x 8 years hahaha
 
If we don't get him this year we'll be waiting until 2029 because there is no way we'll satisfy their trade requests in the middle of the Tasmanian concessions.
 
Watching us against crows this week will not help us getting nwm 🤣

We need to make sure he never meets Hinkley too.
 
Why are you laughing at? It’s far better deal for nas and we can afford it.

Unlike your club and 1.4M x 2yrs and that’s truly funny 😂😂😂
The 2mil wasnt for 8, talk was that bot SA teams were loading the contract to 2 mil upfront for the first couple of years only
The talk about him signing for 2 years simply because people think we don't have the currency is a little fanciful. If he wants to stay he'll stay but he's out of contract, so if he wants to be traded here he will be traded here.
More a case of seeing where the club ( Saints) is heading at that point.
 
If we don't get him this year we'll be waiting until 2029 because there is no way we'll satisfy their trade requests in the middle of the Tasmanian concessions.
plus in 2027 and 2028 we have 4 nga/father sons who will all likely be first rounders at this stage. if we count cochrane in 2026 that makes it 5.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Why are you laughing at? It’s far better deal for nas and we can afford it.

Unlike your club and 1.4M x 2yrs and that’s truly funny 😂😂😂
Not a single club has offered him 2 mill a year.

Has been suggested you would front load his contract and he would be close to 2m in his first couple years.
 
Not a single club has offered him 2 mill a year.

Has been suggested you would front load his contract and he would be close to 2m in his first couple years.
Regardless 1.4 x 2 still laughable considering you’ve got both SA clubs who are offering more money then what you’re offering.
 
Not a single club has offered him 2 mill a year.

Has been suggested you would front load his contract and he would be close to 2m in his first couple years.
It was reported that it was front loaded $2 million per year for the first 2 years. That's $4 million in the first 2 years then evened out over how many other years were contracted, possibly 6 so 8 all up. $4 million for 2 years from Port or $2.8 million from Saints for only 2 years. Another reason he can use that in his terms for PSD. Very evident Port have the salary space to offer $2 million PLUS in NWM contract terms for PSD.
 
It was reported that it was front loaded $2 million per year for the first 2 years. That's $4 million in the first 2 years then evened out over how many other years were contracted, possibly 6 so 8 all up. $4 million for 2 years from Port or $2.8 million from Saints for only 2 years. Another reason he can use that in his terms for PSD. Very evident Port have the salary space to offer $2 million PLUS in NWM contract terms for PSD.
In our 2 year offer, he would have a player trigger where he can extend if he wanted after the 2 years.

Btw not confident he stays at the saints but crazy to say we're gonna lose him due to money
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

This arguing is God awful, Saints fans think he stays or if leaves wants the earth, Port fans we've been reamed so stuff you.

Clearly obvious, doesn't need to be days of the same argument
 
Don't understand how front loading works?
Yeah do you, don’t think so? - 😂😂 1.4M x 2 for a player that’s homestick isn’t really headturning especially when your giving TDK more money and length of contract.

If you really want him as a part of your future, you should be offering this as both of the SA clubs are offering in terms of money and length of the deal.
 
Remember that they're appealing the lowest common denominator in terms of the audience demographic.

Everything is superficial with zero substance.

They're not just appealing though. Most of the ex footballers and media types don't actually know the rules.
 
They're not just appealing though. Most of the ex footballers and media types don't actually know the rules.

Yep. Truth be told I don't watch any AFL talk shows unless it's a soundbite on social media relating to Port because thr overwhelming majority of it is utter crap.

Will happily watch a number of NRL talk shows though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top