Solved OJ Simpson Case
- Thread starter Exe Gesis
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jul 13, 2015
- 36,518
- 40,708
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
His lawyers were brilliant and the govt did a truly awful job.
- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,858
- 56,844
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Imagine being on your deathbed hoping that what comes next is nothing.
Will be interesting to see if he has CTE.
No deathbed confession?
OJ Simpson dies after cancer battle, his family says
www.9news.com.au
"David Zucker got cheeky in his social media tribute.
"R.I.P. Nordberg. 'His acting was a lot like his murdering: He got away with it, but no one believed him',"
Attachments
If you think hard enough I'm sure you'll understand why 'the Son did it' has never gained any traction.
- Jan 15, 2012
- 48,664
- 49,455
- AFL Club
- Richmond
jason_recliner
Club Legend
- Dec 9, 2020
- 2,538
- 2,832
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Innocent until proven guilty!!! 
The prosecution never stood a chance with the Dream Team legal outfit of Cochran, Kardashian, Shapiro and Whybrow!Innocent until proven guilty!!!
Because he isn't famous? Because people were locked into believing OJ did it?
No, he'd never confess. His armored robbery was because he went back to get his Pokémon memorabilia that he'd left' Nothing to do with him at all.
Murderer and armed robber. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
Thanks for posting Pamcake. In all the hoopla of the 'Trial of the century' the real victim gets forgotten. I'll light a candle for her tonight and honour her memory.
The odds are he will. Are they going to look at his brain?
Because OJ was guilty as hell (hopefully there now) and only got off as the defence cashed in on the post King riots environment.
On SM-A125F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Still there.He's an interesting link:
Tucked away on the CNN server is still the 'OJ Simpson Trial Hub' from way back in 1996.
There is no direct link to the page, nor can you find it on the menu structure, but you can get there from the link below.
It's a complete resource of the entire trial, all in 1996 web graphics.
Fascinating.
http://edition.cnn.com/US/OJ/
Option 2 then.
I'm just saying it's been alleged
1. The son was diagnosed with intermittent rage disorder
2. Reportedly stopped taking his medication
3. Was on probation for assault with a deadly weapon after attacking his boss
4. Kept a journal in which he wrote about killing people
5. Assaulted an ex girlfriend with a knife in the past
6. Was slighted by Nicole Brown on the night of the murders
7. Appears to have forged his timecard and has no alibi for his whereabouts at the time of the murders
8. Clothing found at the scene appears to match that worn by him
What rules the son out? I think there's every possibility he was involved and OJ has done his best to cover it up.
If oj really wanted to cover for his son why didnt he ever come out and say he did it? Once he couldn't be tried again, obviously if he confessed nobody would think he was lying, would of totally cleared his son.
- Jan 13, 2004
- 8,387
- 13,753
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Harry's Heroes
I haven't read it. What did he say?
- Jan 13, 2004
- 8,387
- 13,753
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Harry's Heroes
- Jan 13, 2004
- 8,387
- 13,753
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Harry's Heroes
It’s a book with a “hypothetical” (LOL) explanation of how he would have committed the murders if “hypothetically” he had committed them.
He was publishing the book around 2007 in an attempt to cash in on the murders.
The Goldman Family bought the rights to the book and any sales from it.
Why? His son was never charged.
jason_recliner
Club Legend
- Dec 9, 2020
- 2,538
- 2,832
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Can one be tried again if new evidence comes to light?
