On a scale of 1 to 10
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate our recruiting???
I'd say about an 8.
On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate our recruiting???
I'd say about an 8.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
On a scale of 0 to 10
- Thread starter itsintheblood
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
ditto iitb. would have liked a bigger name in the psd and maybe a couple more trades for young but experienced types but all in all im pretty chuffed.
- Thread starter
- #3
hmmm 2 votes for 1.
Looks like robin hood and stugutz have been here again.
Looks like robin hood and stugutz have been here again.
sante
Emu
i voted 9.............you should have done the poll so it was publicitsintheblood said:
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Banned
- #5
gotta be 10,
got rid of zantuck and fiora and got simmonds and knobal and the 2 best young players in australia. not to mention several other young potential talent
got rid of zantuck and fiora and got simmonds and knobal and the 2 best young players in australia. not to mention several other young potential talent
- Banned
- #7
9 for me. Too early to really say of course, but appears much, much better than previous years and there seems to be a definate plan moving foward. I can never remember such a thing. Usually we take a foward step (95) then immediatly take two back (robert walls).
Agreed Bueller , it is way to early to go making calls on how well we have recruited , at the moment they are just a bunch of names who have proven nothing .SaveFeriss said:
Delidio and Tambling were absolute no- brainers and as for the rest , they will be judged in three years just as the likes of Fiora and Petifer have been now .
If the kid Mc Guane dosen`t come up they will be asking questions about that one for years to come .
- Thread starter
- #10
sinepari said:
We'll take that as an 8 then!!!!
Thanks dude.
All the best for the weagles too.
- Banned
- #11
Voted 9.
Reason i didn't vote 10 is because we lost Zantuck for nothing.
Sure, this issue is debatable, but our recruiting/drafting/trading wasn't perfect!
Saying all that though, i'm still wrapped at all our pickups!!
Reason i didn't vote 10 is because we lost Zantuck for nothing.
Sure, this issue is debatable, but our recruiting/drafting/trading wasn't perfect!
Saying all that though, i'm still wrapped at all our pickups!!
sinepari said:
We got Patison at 16, a ruck/KKP
However 1 more big bloke in the PSD/Rookie would have been good.
Over all Id give it a 7, we done quite well.
- But really, its hard to ****** up when u have 5 top 20 picks.
- Banned
- #13
Thursfield is 191cm Bentleigh!
Pattison, Mcguane and Limbach are all young KPP Sinepari.
Deledio at 189cm is pushing at the KPP boundaries a bit aswell.
Pattison, Mcguane and Limbach are all young KPP Sinepari.
Deledio at 189cm is pushing at the KPP boundaries a bit aswell.
Hammerfire said:
Isnt Thurs a out and out full back rather than being able to play KKP?
sante
Emu
He can still play CHB if needed but won't have to as we have Schulz, Moore and ArchibaldBentleigh said:
- Thread starter
- #16
sante said:
You're kidding right? And how many trolls do you think that would have dragged into the poll? We already have 3 morons who've voted 1. I'd say stugutz, robin hood, grrrr.
Similar threads
