Ottens To Stay?

[Wrenny]

From the adelaide board

Ottens will be signing a new contract with Richmond!
One of Wallace's demands.
Richmond will make a play for Judd BIG TIME.
IMO If that fails I think McLeod could also be in their sights.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=125219

 

[IDGAF]

Originally posted by wrennyboy
From the adelaide board

Ottens will be signing a new contract with Richmond!
One of Wallace's demands.
Richmond will make a play for Judd BIG TIME.
IMO If that fails I think McLeod could also be in their sights.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=125219

So that means that Wallace will not be signing on at punt rd. until the end of season as Ottens has put off all contract negociations until the end of the year .

I`m fed up with all this fanciful BS one reads on these boards . Lets deal with facts only . It makes conversation all the more interesting .

Visa -v Wallaces "demands" . Sometimes we make it sound as if we are involved in hostage negotiation

 

[DirtyDogTiger]

enfi;

speaking of demands I will pledge to the club a promise not to renew my membership if they trade our top picks for anyone over the age of 22.

Top pick for Mcleod...what a joke (the punch line was in 1988)

Can we also trade Coughlan and Jackson Brown for a Stegasauras?

Anyone here prefer johnson over wells?

I'll say again ...we are not stVinnies...stop trading top picks !!

idiots

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

Re: enfi;

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger

Anyone here prefer johnson over wells?

preferred to have both and we could have

cheers!

 

[Coach Required]

Re: enfi;

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger


Anyone here prefer johnson over wells?

this was an AFL mistake not a Richmond mistake, as it has been previously brought up, at the time of the Johnson trade is was a 4th pick not a 2nd pick!

the AFL owes us a top draft pick IMO.

 

[Darth_Tiger]

Re: Re: enfi;

Originally posted by Coach Required
this was an AFL mistake not a Richmond mistake, as it has been previously brought up, at the time of the Johnson trade is was a 4th pick not a 2nd pick!

the AFL owes us a top draft pick IMO.

they also owe us for the jeff white fiasco where freo was compensated when jeff white went to melbourne when they were over the sallary cap and freo were given an extra pick in the draft. pretty stupid when jeff white would have left anyway and guess where he would have gone to....Richmond. where is our compensation!?

 

[Coach Required]

here here Darth


not only have Richmond supporters suffered from our bumbling admin, but we also have been shafted from the bumbling AFL admin.

 

[ozserpico66]

Re: Re: enfi;

Originally posted by tiger of old
preferred to have both and we could have

cheers!

I hope you guys understand that we also got Jay Schultz as part of this deal.

Still not perfect but the wash up is we got Kane Johnson and Jay Schultz for Daniel Wells and Jason Torney. The big losers were Adelaide who got Carey and Torney.

So whilst still bad it's not as bad as some people make it out.

 

[Darth_Tiger]

Re: Re: Re: enfi;

Originally posted by ozserpico66
I hope you guys understand that we also got Jay Schultz as part of this deal.

Still not perfect but the wash up is we got Kane Johnson and Jay Schultz for Daniel Wells and Jason Torney. The big losers were Adelaide who got Carey and Torney.

So whilst still bad it's not as bad as some people make it out.

yeah another thing that patdick smith and the idiots at the australian keep forgetting. with shultz thrown in it doesnt look quite so bad.

 

[1980]

Re: Re: Re: enfi;

Originally posted by ozserpico66
I hope you guys understand that we also got Jay Schultz as part of this deal.

Still not perfect but the wash up is we got Kane Johnson and Jay Schultz for Daniel Wells and Jason Torney. The big losers were Adelaide who got Carey and Torney.

So whilst still bad it's not as bad as some people make it out.

Yeah, the big losers were definetely Adelaide, but more a victim of their own abilities than anything else. From memory, we were chasing Carey as a top priority. Lucky for us the Crows outpitched us.

 

[DirtyDogTiger]

Re: enfi;

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger
speaking of demands I will pledge to the club a promise not to renew my membership if they trade our top picks for anyone over the age of 22.

Top pick for Mcleod...what a joke (the punch line was in 1988)

Can we also trade Coughlan and Jackson Brown for a Stegasauras?

Anyone here prefer johnson over wells?

I'll say again ...we are not stVinnies...stop trading top picks !!

idiots

OK so we've all made a meal over my Johnson /Wells crack but I am adamant that we're not coughing up our draft picks for Andrew Mcleod/Simon garlick/Alistair Lynch/Rob Harvey or any other other Tyrannasaurus rex

Is anyone offering top draft picks for wayne Campbell?

I'm sick of my club being a soft touch.

 

[Darth_Tiger]

Re: Re: enfi;

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger
OK so we've all made a meal over my Johnson /Wells crack but I am adamant that we're not coughing up our draft picks for Andrew Mcleod/Simon garlick/Alistair Lynch/Rob Harvey or any other other Tyrannasaurus rex

Is anyone offering top draft picks for wayne Campbell?

I'm sick of my club being a soft touch.

i think there would be a riot at punt road if our top draft picks are traded away for anyone other than a Luke Ball or a Chris Judd. miller i wouldnt think is stupid enough to allow it to happen, we are all sick of it and if terry wallace is coach i would seriously doubt he would let it happen either. You are right tho dirty dog, we are all sick to death of it.

 

[kretchy]

Don't know what all the concern is about one poster on the Crows board has stated that he thinks we will go after McLeod. No source or anything just his opinion don't read so much into it.

I think all the Melbourne sides will also make a big play for Judd we wouldn't be the only ones.

 

[DirtyDogTiger]

what the....

Originally posted by kretchy
Don't know what all the concern is about one poster on the Crows board has stated that he thinks we will go after McLeod.

Because it all adds up.

95; Holland..first and second rounds
96 Steinfort and Chaffey
97 Ottens
98 Hilton and Bidders...First and second rounds
99; Fiora and Cameron
00...Pettifer and Coughlan
01 Stafford and rodan
02 Schulz and Blumfield
03 Brown and Gilmore

If any club for go for it, it's us

 

[kretchy]

Re: what the....

Originally posted by DirtyDogTiger
Because it all adds up.

95; Holland..first and second rounds
96 Steinfort and Chaffey
97 Ottens
98 Hilton and Bidders...First and second rounds
99; Fiora and Cameron
00...Pettifer and Coughlan
01 Stafford and rodan
02 Schulz and Blumfield
03 Brown and Gilmore

If any club for go for it, it's us

Fair enough, but with a new coach involved on the trading side of things it is a bit hard to say that we are going to be trading away early draft picks again. And when we draft guys like Pettifer and Fiora inside the top 10 maybe its not such a bad idea to trade them away. Although if it was up to me I would be keeping our top 10 pick/s unless the unlikely situation arised and we were able to get a Judd or Riewoldt.