- Joined
- Jul 13, 2006
- Posts
- 585
- Reaction score
- 18
- Location
- North
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- The Bruce, Rivers, Grimesy
Now we've never been the greatest kick in specialists. In fact for the last 10 years or so I'd say we were average at best. So its been interesting to see the strategies put in place this year.
In the first round we seemed to go short to the pockets and then try the ol run and carry around the opposition. Cue hospital handballs galore resulting in goals a plenty for the opposition.
But it seems as though in the collingwood game and especially the adelaide game, the strategy has changed. Instead of going short to the pockets, it seems we are targeting Jamar who has been instructed to float outside 50. Then one of two things happen - either Jamar marks and we're sweet, or Jamar creates a contest at his feet at which many dees players have now congregated and they work together to effect the take away and happy days ensue.
Its definitely an interesting strategy which was relatively effective against Adelaide, but seemed to really rely on the ground level players dominating the contested possessions in order to effect the take away. Rather then rely on keeping possession we are essentially kicking to a 50-50 and then backing our boys to get the clearance. Its a high risk reward type strategy which has worked so far but I just hope we have a plan B if we start getting smashed at the contested possessions.
In the first round we seemed to go short to the pockets and then try the ol run and carry around the opposition. Cue hospital handballs galore resulting in goals a plenty for the opposition.
But it seems as though in the collingwood game and especially the adelaide game, the strategy has changed. Instead of going short to the pockets, it seems we are targeting Jamar who has been instructed to float outside 50. Then one of two things happen - either Jamar marks and we're sweet, or Jamar creates a contest at his feet at which many dees players have now congregated and they work together to effect the take away and happy days ensue.
Its definitely an interesting strategy which was relatively effective against Adelaide, but seemed to really rely on the ground level players dominating the contested possessions in order to effect the take away. Rather then rely on keeping possession we are essentially kicking to a 50-50 and then backing our boys to get the clearance. Its a high risk reward type strategy which has worked so far but I just hope we have a plan B if we start getting smashed at the contested possessions.






