Sigh at the main board. They think the whole trade ban is black and white; just cut the COLA and you are free to trade. If they did a bit of research, they'd realise that the whole cutting of COLA thing would lead to heaps of ramifications...
-
LIVE: Carlton v Collingwood - Rd 6 - 7:30PM Thu
Squiggle tips Pies at 64% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 6 Games
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 6
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
5 Winner: The LEDGE
No Oppo Supporters Outrage thread (Swans posters only)
- Thread starter Swansujelly
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2005
- Posts
- 12,017
- Reaction score
- 14,393
- Location
- Between ANZ & the SCG
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Bloods
Paint a picture.
Loaded gun against our forehead. AFL says pull the trigger and everything will be sweet.
Loaded gun against our forehead. AFL says pull the trigger and everything will be sweet.
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2003
- Posts
- 30,171
- Reaction score
- 6,329
- Location
- far queue
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- NSW Blues
Cutting the allowance means that players contracts are still honored but the allowance amounts will be included in the TPP.
In effect there is no phase out period.
Two scenarios.
1. Get rid off the allowance immediately means we can trade. The problem is that the contracts will still need to be satisfied. They will be satisfied by including the allowance amount in the TPP. So the TPP room left by the departure of ROK, LRT and Malceski will be filled by the allowance. This equals no ability to trade.
2. Don't include the allowance in the TPP and we can't trade. Self evident.
The phase out period is not real. It's just another illusion by the AFL.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Posts
- 39,619
- Reaction score
- 48,063
- AFL Club
- Sydney
Glad this trade period is over today after this bullshit ban.
To hear we might off had Ryder makes it more frustrating as he would of been a perfect fit.
If they make up some bullshit rule and take Mills/Dunkley off us , well go get farked.
This not being able to bring in players could stuff us big time , it might mean players that were due to retire ( Shaw this year ) and say Ted etc next might have to go on another year and if they fall of the cliff having to run around in the Neafl is a joke.
To hear we might off had Ryder makes it more frustrating as he would of been a perfect fit.
If they make up some bullshit rule and take Mills/Dunkley off us , well go get farked.
This not being able to bring in players could stuff us big time , it might mean players that were due to retire ( Shaw this year ) and say Ted etc next might have to go on another year and if they fall of the cliff having to run around in the Neafl is a joke.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2014
- Posts
- 3,231
- Reaction score
- 6,080
- AFL Club
- Sydney
If the rumor about Ryder is true what was our offer going to be? Our first pick is taken with Heeney so it must have been players.
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2007
- Posts
- 66,184
- Reaction score
- 58,245
- Location
- Lake Oval
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- SMFC. PMFC,OAFC
Membrey and Jetta
