List Mgmt. Paddy McCartin

[Wizard]

The guy from my knowledge is the man expected to go number 1 in this years draft.

So in theory we ain't getting him unfortunately, but........ according to Mark Stevens we have interviewed him.

So this means one of two things, we are planning to make a play at a big trade OR we are doing our due dilegence and keeping options in front of us.

 

[FrancisX]

The guy from my knowledge is the man expected to go number 1 in this years draft.

So in theory we ain't getting him unfortunately, but........ according to Mark Stevens we have interviewed him.

So this means one of two things, we are planning to make a play at a big trade OR we are doing our due dilegence and keeping options in front of us.

Interesting

 

[malpaso]

Due diligence, nothing to see here.

 

[mike91]

The guy from my knowledge is the man expected to go number 1 in this years draft.

So in theory we ain't getting him unfortunately, but........ according to Mark Stevens we have interviewed him.

So this means one of two things, we are planning to make a play at a big trade OR we are doing our due dilegence and keeping options in front of us.

Western Bulldogs are interviewing him today also. Clubs are just doing the rounds, for us to get #1 we'd have to give up someone like Hill which wont happen.

 

[Allikat]

Surely just due diligence. I can't see any way we could possibly get a pick that high unless we're trading Fyfe.

 

[Rob]

Sometimes things happen which alter the draft order months out from the draft.

Let's say he does his knee this week (not to wish it on the kid). He probably won't go number 1 then.

 

[se17enteen]

Waste of time interviewing him, no way can Bond and co can flip pick 18 to 1 without losing a gun player.

 

[beetz]

The guy from my knowledge is the man expected to go number 1 in this years draft.

So in theory we ain't getting him unfortunately, but........ according to Mark Stevens we have interviewed him.

So this means one of two things, we are planning to make a play at a big trade OR we are doing our due dilegence and keeping options in front of us.

stopped reading after "according to Mark Stevens"

 

[Docker82]

Thought clubs interviewed everyone they'd be interested in drafting? I see no reason not to interview him. What if he wants out in a few years and we both need him and can afford him? We know more about him than we otherwise would. I see that as a positive. It's always useful to talk to and get to know as many draftees as possible IMO. You never know what could happen. Many draftees are talked to semi-regularly by clubs. There's no harm spending a little time talking to him. He could be the next Jack Watts. I'm sure the club is still putting enough resources into guys that we realistically can get in the draft.

 

[MadMac]

Waste of time interviewing him, no way can Bond and co can flip pick 18 to 1 without losing a gun player.

I see what you did there
Here's hoping we end up with pick 18 as our first pick

 

[Pusswah]

Related to Pat McGroyne or Pat Malone?

Or maybe Phil McCracken?

 

[jusjoshin]

Unlikely to get him unless he's knocked up a WA girl. Even then, West Coast are likely to take him just to spite us.