- Joined
- Dec 30, 2003
- Posts
- 6,034
- Reaction score
- 28
- Location
- At the BFPA Mansion
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea Wests Tigers
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Frustrating and disappointing to lose against the Tiges last Thursday. Watched a replay of the game a few times, and realise now that we do in fact have a lot more positives to take out of the game than the Tiges. It was an interesting game with huge contrasts.
Reason 1: 47% of the Tiges goals were kicked by players with an average age of 31 !
Hardly an investment in the future. The Tiges played 5, 30 year old, or older players in that lineup. The Blues played none in that age group, and instead invested gametime into younger players. This is the better approach.
Reason 2: Our opposition needed to employ extreme ultra-flooding
It was an effective tactic by Terry on the night. It forced us to hold possession of the ball longer before entering the forwardline, and often our young players made skill errors as a consequence, resulting in a turnover. While flooding worked, it’s a loser tactic, and I am so glad Ratten doesn’t go down that path.
Reason 3: Glimpses of future brilliance and potential e.g. 1st and 2nd quarter
When the young Blues got their act together, the glimpses of brilliance shone through in a few passages. e.g. 2nd quarter. Watching the game again, it is clear that not only are our young players coming to terms with a new style of gameplan, but these players are still learning to anticipate their team-mates actions. Much of our list has played way less than 50 games. Game time is needed. There are no shortcuts. But there is potential there, massive potential.
Reason 4: Judd’s leadership
Early days, but I’m impressed with his attitude. Seems to be focussing on the importance of his role as an on-field leader a lot more than he did at West Coast, almost certainly because he realises that he is effectively a mentor to a large group of very young players. Thought his article in The Age was a great demonstration that not only do we have the best player in the AFL, but we have an intelligent, insightful leader with a success mindset. By contrast mention of the Tiges captains name, just brings laughter for many reasons. Again, no future.
Reason 5: Way below full strength
Judd and Stevens are way below full fitness, Walker out, Fisher out, Kruezer out, Hampson out. Plus a lots of talented young players will also be pushing hard for selection. By contrast the Tiges were at 100% capacity.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad


Actually the way I understand it because they won 4 games last year they can win 4 again this year and would qualify for picks 1 & 2 unless we also ended up in that position. Poor Melbourne they could end up with 2 wins and end up with pick 2 just like us.I think they only get the 2nd round priority this time, not the first. They'll get the 1st round priority again the next year.
It's worse than that. Carlton and Richmond could conceivably win 4 games each, the Dees could win zero games and it would go something like this:Actually the way I understand it because they won 4 games last year they can win 4 again this year and would qualify for picks 1 & 2 unless we also ended up in that position. Poor Melbourne they could end up with 2 wins and end up with pick 2 just like us.
I destroyed the evidence.Triple post of same content.
Ban plz Khan.![]()

That would be extremely average for Melbourne. They look like they need the priority more than anyone else at the moment.It's worse than that. Carlton and Richmond could conceivably win 4 games each, the Dees could win zero games and it would go something like this:
1. Carlton/Richmond (depending on percentage)
2. Carlton/Richmond
3. Melbourne
4. Carlton/Richmond
5. Carlton/Richmond
19. Melbourne
20. Melbourne
Melbourne could not win a game and end up with only Pick 3. Surely this would be the end of the priority pick system if it happened.
Obviously both Carlton and Richmond supporters would be hoping we are not in a position for this to happen.
That quote just inspired a suspicion...he probably already is a politician...who else wouldn't be surprised?Parrot would make a great politician. Just full of crap.

