and you don't think they haven't been coached to do that.
Clearly not well enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
and you don't think they haven't been coached to do that.
I welcome serious heat to be put on Paul Roos this week before the Geelong game. Has been disappointing this year tbh. Highest paid coach in the AFL and it's debatable whether we have improved as a team under him. You can only blame the past for so long before you get fingers pointed your way. Dogs and GWS have both gone past us, and Saints proved today they simply have more heart. Gold Coast will be ok once there injuries free up, which leaves Brisbane and Carlton as the only teams arguably worse than us right now, and you could make a case for both being at least on a par with us. Roos simply hasn't delivered. I'd be happy for Goodwin to take the reins next year.
Clearly not well enough.
I agree. It was sort of hard for Roos to take Melbourne backwards with all the young talent on the list. He was in a win/win situation and pocketing upwards of a mil a year too.
i think the point was, you couldnt take Melbourne any further backwards than the position it was at when he took over. Thus the only outcome under any conceivable situation/scenario regardless of the coach was improvement.Are you serious saying it was hard for Roos to take the list backwards because of all the young talent on melb list, When Roos took over Melb our list was in awful shape in fact having 22 changes over 2 years and most likely after this season having 30 changes in 3 years tells you the list wasn't in great shape. We are in a lot better shape than we was a few years ago, But still have so much work to do.
i think the point was, you couldnt take Melbourne any further backwards than the position it was at when he took over. Thus the only outcome under any conceivable situation/scenario regardless of the coach was improvement.
i think the point was, you couldnt take Melbourne any further backwards than the position it was at when he took over. Thus the only outcome under any conceivable situation/scenario regardless of the coach was improvement.
Good post.
I got pillard for essentially posting the same thing a month a go. Roos, is a good coach but the situation he is in, is something he has never experienced before. At sydney he has gun players who would win games, dig deep, and are smart footballers who can react to the opposition in real time. A lot of that, allows the coach the Luxury to focus on one or two things but with the trust of the playing group, he can rest easy knowing the players will take up the slack.
At Melbourne, he does not have that luxury, its the reason some of his coaching mistakes are plain for all to see. Now a mix of that is the playing group but also the lack of pro activeness from the coach.
In saying the above. Roos is a good coach but he is no Messiah. The Dee's are on 3 wins at the half way mark. On the win/loss column he is not performing any better the Neeld. Now admittedly off field there has been a huge improvement. Melbourne has now drafted some real gems. How is to say though, If neeled had the same level of off field support as Roo's has now, that the results would not be the same or better ?
Roos last year is next year ? Will be intersting if the Dee's finish bottom 4 again next year.
How's the worst 41 seconds ever seen in football Paul?
Your comments came back at ya .
Good post.
I got pillard for essentially posting the same thing a month a go. Roos, is a good coach but the situation he is in, is something he has never experienced before. At sydney he has gun players who would win games, dig deep, and are smart footballers who can react to the opposition in real time. A lot of that, allows the coach the Luxury to focus on one or two things but with the trust of the playing group, he can rest easy knowing the players will take up the slack.
At Melbourne, he does not have that luxury, its the reason some of his coaching mistakes are plain for all to see. Now a mix of that is the playing group but also the lack of pro activeness from the coach.
In saying the above. Roos is a good coach but he is no Messiah. The Dee's are on 3 wins at the half way mark. On the win/loss column he is not performing any better the Neeld. Now admittedly off field there has been a huge improvement. Melbourne has now drafted some real gems. How is to say though, If neeled had the same level of off field support as Roo's has now, that the results would not be the same or better ?
Roos last year is next year ? Will be intersting if the Dee's finish bottom 4 again next year.
Your an Idiot, Neelds wins came against the expansion clubs when they were just 18 and 19 year olds...
The only non expansion side Neeld beat was essendon and then Neil Craig took over and we beat the bulldogs
We are a far better side than we were whos results wont be seen until next year
LOL, no sir you are a idiot.
I did not say Neeld was better then Roos, just posed the question of Neeld had the off field support that Roos enjoys, would he have improved your club ?
I figured the question was not that hard to understand.
Now we know where all the Ricmond angst comes from.
In case nobody has seen it or forgotten it.
When does a coach alone ever solve a clubs issues?
Messiah , just like another current coach, mate he was happy to slag other clubs, so the karma bus has returned,
Lot of Richmond fans in the thread. Slagging the guy who worked you out so well he got his bunch of no-hopers to belt your side by 32 points in round 4.
If he's not the messiah, it make you wonder what you must all think of Hardwick.
Yes. Ask Essendon fans. Hird isn't the messiah, he's a shining golden god.We beat St Kilda but their 3 wins ahead of us.
Does this mean Hird >>> Clarkson?