Conspiracy Theory Pizzagate *DEBUNKED

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

View attachment 874677

Ahh, instantly back to square one again.

All I am asking for is proof of your claims.
Just saying “you R dUm FoR knOt NoInG thIs” is not proof.

 

[FredLeDeux]

Ahh, instantly back to square one again.

All I am asking for is proof of your claims.
Just saying “you R dUm FoR knOt NoInG thIs” is not proof.

Didn't anybody ever tell you that peoples' articles of faith are immune to rational argument and questioning?

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

Didn't anybody ever tell you that peoples' articles of faith are immune to rational argument and questioning?

Well no, but I see where you are coming from.

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

This is the board to question the status quo right?

Well I am all for that but I would just like a quality reason to question that status quo other than guesswork & hypothesis.

 

[Pugz89]

Bizarre assumption. What makes you think that?

How does a meme involving Donald Trump’s former buddy being convicted of sex crimes equate to a worldwide pedophile ring that includes human trafficking and child sacrifices as per pizzagate?

So when did the penny drop for you? What has made this undeniable in your mind?

That the emails were legit? Probably after a few days when Clinton and co didn't question authenticity and instead just complained about why they were hacked and how it cost them the election. What evidence do you have that they aren't authentic?

As for one of your other questions, a meme itself doesn't equate to a pedophile sex ring, but using a jigsaw puzzle analogy, one square of a yellow sun doesn't equate to a beach sunset photo.
But putting all the other pieces in their right place allows us to see that when each piece is put together they all combine to give us a complete image/situation. Same thing here.

One meme doesn't equate to the ring, but lots of other little things including news articles of arrests can be added to potentially broaden the idea. One cell doesn't equate to a human, but from that one cell a process occurs where lots of independent cells intertwine to form a human.

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

That the emails were legit? Probably after a few days when Clinton and co didn't question authenticity and instead just complained about why they were hacked and how it cost them the election.

So Clinton who is painted as a villain is now your excuse of truth? Talk about having your cake and eating it too.
Just out of curiosity, how would you deal with slander on that scale, accept it or deny culpability and try to throw shade over your accuser?

What evidence do you have that they aren't authentic?

None. Just questioning yours. Like I said show me something sustainable and I will be onboard. I am neutral, just questioning the story so far.

As for one of your other questions, a meme itself doesn't equate to a pedophile sex ring, but using a jigsaw puzzle analogy, one square of a yellow sun doesn't equate to a beach sunset photo.

If you read the direct post I was responding to on it then it will put it into a clearer context.

But putting all the other pieces in their right place allows us to see that when each piece is put together they all combine to give us a complete image/situation. Same thing here.

Hardly solid though. Mostly what I see is coincidences being forced into place to carry the narrative.

One meme doesn't equate to the ring, but lots of other little things including news articles of arrests can be added to potentially broaden the idea. One cell doesn't equate to a human, but from that one cell a process occurs where lots of independent cells intertwine to form a human.

Well my initial question was about the meme and Tim Nolan’s involvement in a worldwide human trafficking set up that confirms pizzagate.

 

[Pugz89]

So Clinton who is painted as a villain is now your excuse of truth? Talk about having your cake and eating it too.
Just out of curiosity, how would you deal with slander on that scale, accept it or deny culpability and try to throw shade over your accuser?

None. Just questioning yours. Like I said show me something sustainable and I will be onboard. I am neutral, just questioning the story so far.

If you read the direct post I was responding to on it then it will put it into a clearer context.

Hardly solid though. Mostly what I see is coincidences being forced into place to carry the narrative.

Well my initial question was about the meme and Tim Nolan’s involvement in a worldwide human trafficking set up that confirms pizzagate.

I don't understand your point about Clinton being painted the villain being my excuse of truth. Can you explain that for me.
As for slander on that scale, if I knew I'd not sent the emails, I'd absolutely deny they were sent, engage lawyers and go about defending myself. None if that was done, in fact almost the complete opposite. She conceded that battle, which is something I cannot imagine any reasonable person would do if they didn't send the emails in question.

So I am curious. If you are questioning my story and proof, do you also question how the emails couldn't be legitimate. Because the DNC have admitted they were authentic, so right now there has been more proof presented to say they are authentic and legitimate, as opposed to fake and forged communications.

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

I don't understand your point about Clinton being painted the villain being my excuse of truth. Can you explain that for me.

On one hand you are happy to say her compliance with letting this email rigmarole go is proof of her involvement thus implicating herself, yet with the other you seem to think that she has not defended herself of any such involvement (where in actual fact she has not even been legitimately approached over this pr0n ring accusation and has never been required to answer to it) is also proof of her compliance.
How this email extravaganza relates to human trafficking, child prostitutes and satanic worship beggars belief.

As for slander on that scale, if I knew I'd not sent the emails, I'd absolutely deny they were sent, engage lawyers and go about defending myself. None if that was done, in fact almost the complete opposite. She conceded that battle, which is something I cannot imagine any reasonable person would do if they didn't send the emails in question.

Or perhaps it was just such a crazy theory that it was not worth spending millions on trying to defend?

I am sure Michelle Obama would treat the CT that she is a man with the same lack of care.

So I am curious. If you are questioning my story and proof, do you also question how the emails couldn't be legitimate. Because the DNC have admitted they were authentic, so right now there has been more proof presented to say they are authentic and legitimate, as opposed to fake and forged communications.

So if it is all clean cut & legit why are there no sanctions?

Surely Trump could make this stick if he thought it to be a decent road to go down but now from what I can gather on this board he is also one of the masterminds (or the puppet) of this secretive society and lets it slide because he and Hillary and somehow on the same team behind the curtain.

Also the belief or theory that Trump won the election because this supposedly all conquering, all knowing, all encompassing underground organizational power of centuries “slipped up” is pure Tim Burton stuff.

It is incredibly interesting to read mind you and props for some of this stuff but you cannot be offended or label others as stupid on this board if questions are asked.

 

[Pugz89]

On one hand you are happy to say her compliance with letting this email rigmarole go is proof of her involvement thus implicating herself, yet with the other you seem to think that she has not defended herself of any such involvement (where in actual fact she has not even been legitimately approached over this pr0n ring accusation and has never been required to answer to it) is also proof of her compliance.
How this email extravaganza relates to human trafficking, child prostitutes and satanic worship beggars belief.

Or perhaps it was just such a crazy theory that it was not worth spending millions on trying to defend?

I am sure Michelle Obama would treat the CT that she is a man with the same lack of care.

So if it is all clean cut & legit why are there no sanctions?

Right, okay. So if someone is being compliant, then a direct result would be that the person would be unable to defend themselves successfully against an accusation. So let's say john doe got named in a newspaper as a drug runner. If john was not a drug runner, he would absolutely sue that newspaper for defamation unless he was actually a drug runner, in which case he woukd have no legal standing to pursue damages, because the newspaper report was the truth.
You cannot defend yourself of implication if you are in fact compliant to the act in the specific allegation.

As for your next point, the satanic worship part I think was born out of the spirit cooking and Marina Abramovic aspects of the emails. The pedophile and human trafficking links are due to the apparent codes used in the email, which align with codes utilised by the FBI for the investigations they initiate.

Lastly, I could understand if it was a small allegation that she wouldn't pursue it, but she has since said it contributed to her losing the election. Taking out all the specific contents but she has said the release of her emails harmed her chances of getting elected. In what world could that possibly be "not worth spending millions on trying to defend,"? Perhaps, as I am saying, that the reason she is not spending millions trying to defend herself and claim damages is because the emails released were authentic.

You have also failed to answer my question on whether you question the idea that the emails are supposedly fake? As mentioned, I believe I have put significant evidence forward they are real, yet you have put no evidence forward that they were fake or forged.
An honest question, have you seen more evidence that the emails released by Wikileaks were fake or more evidence that they were legitimate?

 

[exe ex machina]

Theres a danger to litigating against accusers. Because the court case would therefore mean the accusers bringing out evidence to support their claims, and thus the accused would end up in a worse position.

Its obvious that one guilty does not pursue litigation, and that they hide behind the skirts of the elite and shadow govt who protect them.

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

Right, okay. So if someone is being compliant, then a direct result would be that the person would be unable to defend themselves successfully against an accusation.

Depending on the circumstances then who knows? Show your example.

So let's say john doe got named in a newspaper as a drug runner. If john was not a drug runner, he would absolutely sue that newspaper for defamation unless he was actually a drug runner, in which case he woukd have no legal standing to pursue damages, because the newspaper report was the truth.
You cannot defend yourself of implication if you are in fact compliant to the act in the specific allegation.

Was John a person who cared what faceless nobodies thought?
Did John think his social standing would not matter either way?

As for your next point, the satanic worship part I think was born out of the spirit cooking and Marina Abramovic aspects of the emails. The pedophile and human trafficking links are due to the apparent codes used in the email, which align with codes utilised by the FBI for the investigations they initiate.

So, you’re saying that is bullshit which has only gathered ground amongst the CT community?

Lastly, I could understand if it was a small allegation that she wouldn't pursue it, but she has since said it contributed to her losing the election. Taking out all the specific contents but she has said the release of her emails harmed her chances of getting elected. In what world could that possibly be "not worth spending millions on trying to defend,"? Perhaps, as I am saying, that the reason she is not spending millions trying to defend herself and claim damages is because the emails released were authentic.

Ok, so where does that take this?

You have also failed to answer my question on whether you question the idea that the emails are supposedly fake? As mentioned, I believe I have put significant evidence forward they are real, yet you have put no evidence forward that they were fake or forged.
An honest question, have you seen more evidence that the emails released by Wikileaks were fake or more evidence that they were legitimate?

I have already said I have no evidence either way, you have provided exactly the same, unless I missed something?

 

[norway blue]

This is the board to question the status quo right?

Well I am all for that but I would just like a quality reason to question that status quo other than guesswork & hypothesis.

Yes it is. Reason is the world is at best not going well. Thus the questions. Especially regarding this topic to be on topic.


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

Yes it is. Reason is the world is at best not going well. Thus the questions. Especially regarding this topic to be on topic.

ffs and you think my questions are inapplicable?

Just tell me the last time you think the world was going well.

 

[norway blue]

Thus regarding questions meant this board and thread . You have a voice . No one is shutting you down . There are no mods on this thread. I want a peaceful world .


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[norway blue]

ffs and you think my questions are inapplicable?

Just tell me the last time you think the world was going well.

Not for a long time .


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[PoppedCorn]

The whole last two pages is you guys and girls quoting that peanut
Put the idiot on ignore then it'll be talking to itself and you'll be able to spend that energy discussing the thread and not having to explain everything to someone who is completely trolling u.
They're doing exactly what they want u to do....bite.
It's being done deliberate and for some reason you all feel the need to explain something to someone who understands it all completely fine but just wants to watch u get mad and expel wasted energy

It's like believing there's a diff between political parties.

 

[Pugz89]

Depending on the circumstances then who knows? Show your example.

Was John a person who cared what faceless nobodies thought?
Did John think his social standing would not matter either way?

So, you’re saying that is bullshit which has only gathered ground amongst the CT community?

Ok, so where does that take this?

I have already said I have no evidence either way, you have provided exactly the same, unless I missed something?

You have missed plenty, but that's okay. I have tried to converse respectfully and concisely, but it seems we are at severe disagreement on the first and last points of your post at the very least. Anywho, I am done. I have stated my point of view and to say someone wouldn't defend themselves against an accusation that could be proven to be incorrect is conspiracy theory stuff as well. Who wouldn't want to clear their name when it is slandered, no matter who they are!?

Anyway, I will leave it there. Clearly we disagree and so there is not much point continuing to discuss it.

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

You have missed plenty, but that's okay. I have tried to converse respectfully and concisely, but it seems we are at severe disagreement on the first and last points of your post at the very least. Anywho, I am done. I have stated my point of view and to say someone wouldn't defend themselves against an accusation that could be proven to be incorrect is conspiracy theory stuff as well. Who wouldn't want to clear their name when it is slandered, no matter who they are!?

Anyway, I will leave it there. Clearly we disagree and so there is not much point continuing to discuss it.

Thanks for telling me all that.

 

[maryjames]

Just watching Aljazeera and a doco called Shadow World.

Watch that and think what they do to kids with bombs etc .. it’s about the world politicians with the global arms trade and the corruption and dodgy trade and political “hero’s” on the take...

 

[hawks realist]

Why is there such a push on allowing abortion up to 9 months from the democrats and globalists like Jacinta? That would have been considered murder 5-10 years ago. Now because they think they have conditioned people long enough they can roll that out and get away with it. What actually happens to a lot of those babies and i wonder where the unlucky ones end up. Bit like some people trying to normalize paedophilia...
Tin foil stuff to some but there's lots of dots to connect i believe

 

[Bumpswithagrin]

Not sure where to put this exactly but as it related to pedophiles I'll stick it here (mods move if required).

So I keep reading little tidbits here and there about the Royal Family, especially the Queen. At first I thought there were reasonable explanations for everything but now I'm not so sure

One thing was she is not returning to Buckingham palace anytime soon and at this stage will not be performing any royal duties until Autumn at the earliest (that's Pommy Autumn not ours obviously). Well she is very old and the virus etc.

Then someone pointed out that when Trump visited and they inspected the British troops together she let him walk ahead of her, apparently this NEVER happens, the monarch always goes first when inspecting the troops. Well maybe orange man just barged ahead not knowing royal protocol being the big oaf that he is.

Then I saw this tweet that goes on about the importance of the Queen wearing her regalia and crown for the opening of parliament. However the photo was from 2017 and there was a good reason apparently (rushed scheduling or some such). So then I checked and it appears she hasn't worn her crown since 2015, before Trump got elected. In 2016 the opening was cancelled by Theresa May (most unusual), in 2017 she wore street clothes as per the picture in this tweet, and in 2018 and 2019 she wore her regalia but no crown

Is the whole royal family going down????

 

[PoppedCorn]

Reckon there was talk that they and a few other Europe royal families will fall.

But like the whole tom and elen thing, when i see it I'll believe it...although the msn is still trashing elen about her attitude and how she is a complete bitch.
Nothing major...
Just small articles now and then.

 

[exe ex machina]

From PoppedCorn post in Qanon thread...
Most explosive video update ive seen on this. Many names named, evidence provided of a global network via court indictment shown towards the back half of video....heads of state, military/intel people, hollywood celebs.

 

[Fwoy]

Why does every video have to be 40 mins long?

 

[HAPPY BUDDHA]

From PoppedCorn post in Qanon thread...
Most explosive video update ive seen on this. Many names named, evidence provided of a global network via court indictment shown towards the back half of video....heads of state, military/intel people, hollywood celebs.

If it has footage of Hillary drinking the blood from a human foetus she has just cut from the womb of a living mother then I’m all in!