Sim Player v Player

[Mobbs]

Tarks requested this (twice).

Simmed a test with raw data output only. Turned off auto positional changes, as haven't ensured it will work with swaps of opponent yet.

Will eventually have those and, rather than stating numbers, will be text like {a} gave {b} a bath.


Holt 15.25 v Ardito 8
Daniel 16.25 v Arney 16
Jakob 23.75 v Baylor 11.5
Blankenship 21.25 v Welsh 18.25
Blom 9.25 v Delano 31.5
Marcotte 7.75 v Burggraf 10.25
Delgado 15.75 v Diehm 20.75
Maldonado 7.75 v Gill 5.5
Gurley 60 v Roach 39.5
Haller 17.75 v Rhoden 31
Lockhart 76.75 v Sproul 56.75
Waldron 18.5 v Meaney 21.5
Merritt 16 v Pals 4
Murphy 20.25 v Muncy 18.25
Newkirk 10.75 v Yoakum 7.75
Norton 25.5 v Rothman 14.25
Troester 38 v Raynor 52.25
Wenig 20 v Templin 17

 

[Logger]

What do the scores represent?

 

[Mobbs]

How well they played in a match. The two players were opposing each other (C v C, CHF v CHB, Rov v Rov).

These scores have to be hidden when real matches happen as they directly relate to the votes.

 

[Mobbs]

Testing with auto changes on :

                            HATTAH
Newkirk                     Burggraf                 Ardito
Yoakum                      Marcotte                 Holt

Baylor                      Norton                   Wenig
Jakob                       Rothman                  Templin

Waldron                     Muncy                    Arney
Meaney                      Murphy                   Daniel

Delgado                     Blankenship              Delano
Diehm                       Welsh                    Blom

Gill                        Rhoden                   Pals
Maldonado                   Haller                   Merritt
                            CARWARP

CARWARP Foll : Roach, Sproul, Raynor
HATTAH Foll : Gurley, Lockhart, Troester

CARWARP INT : Petersen, Constantine
HATTAH INT : Waite, Girouard

So the matchups are :
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Holt
Baylor v Jakob
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Blom
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Waite and Girouard on bench

Player moves according to the commentary :
1 : .12 - <<< Girouard is coming on to replace Blom >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Holt
Baylor v Jakob
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Waite and Blom on bench

1 : .47 - <<< Waite is coming on to replace Jakob >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Holt
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Blom on bench

1 : 3.48 - <<< Jakob is coming on to replace Maldonado >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Holt
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Jakob
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Maldonado and Blom on bench

1 : 4.48 - <<< Blom is coming on to replace Holt >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Jakob
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Maldonado and Holt on bench

1 : 9.07 - <<< Maldonado is coming on to replace Jakob >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Holt on bench

1 : 11.19 - <<< Holt is coming on to replace Daniel >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Daniel on bench

1 : 13.33 - <<< Daniel is coming on to replace Marcotte >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Marcotte on bench

1 : 15.28 - <<< Marcotte is coming on to replace Murphy >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Girouard
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Murphy on bench

1 : 17.01 - <<< Murphy is coming on to replace Girouard >>>
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Girouard on bench

2 : 8.2 - <<< Petersen is coming on to replace Newkirk >>>
Petersen v Yoakum
Burggraf v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Newkirk and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Girouard on bench
First change to the second team, all the other were for the first one. Was really starting to freak me out

2 : 8.59 - <<< Constantine is coming on to replace Ardito >>>
Petersen v Yoakum
Burggraf v Daniel
Constantine v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Newkirk and Ardito on bench
Jakob and Girouard on bench

2 : 15 - <<< Ardito is coming on to replace Constantine >>>
Petersen v Yoakum
Burggraf v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Newkirk and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Girouard on bench

2 : 22.58 - <<< Newkirk is coming on to replace Burggraf >>>
Petersen v Yoakum
Newkirk v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Burggraf and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Girouard on bench

3 : 8.2 - <<< Roach is trading places with Petersen >>>
Roach v Yoakum
Newkirk v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Petersen v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Burggraf and Constantine on bench
Jakob and Girouard on bench

3 : 11.21 - <<< Jakob is coming on to replace Maldonado >>>
Roach v Yoakum
Newkirk v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Jakob
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Petersen v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Burggraf and Constantine on bench
Maldonado and Girouard on bench

4 : 3.25 - <<< Burggraf is coming on to replace Delgado >>>
Roach v Yoakum
Newkirk v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Burggraf v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Jakob
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Petersen v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Delgado and Constantine on bench
Maldonado and Girouard on bench

4 : 7.37 - <<< Girouard is coming on to replace Yoakum >>>
Roach v Girouard
Newkirk v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Burggraf v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Jakob
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Petersen v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Delgado and Constantine on bench
Maldonado and Yoakum on bench

4 : 22.25 - <<< Yoakum is coming on to replace Merritt >>>
Roach v Girouard
Newkirk v Daniel
Ardito v Blom
Baylor v Waite
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Marcotte
Arney v Holt
Burggraf v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Murphy
Gill v Jakob
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Yoakum
Petersen v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Delgado and Constantine on bench
Maldonado and Merritt on bench


TIME ON GROUND :

[b][color=burgundy]CARWARP[/color][/b]
Newkirk              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]33.2 (Off)[/color] [color=green]47.58 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 85%[/color][/b]
Burggraf             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]47.58 (Off)[/color] [color=green]78.25 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 69%[/color][/b]
Ardito               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]33.59 (Off)[/color] [color=green]40 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 93%[/color][/b]
Baylor               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Norton               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Wenig                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Waldron              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Muncy                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Arney                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Delgado              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]78.25 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 78%[/color][/b]
Blankenship          [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Delano               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Gill                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Rhoden               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Pals                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Roach                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Sproul               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Raynor               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Petersen             [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]33.2 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 66%[/color][/b]
Constantine          [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]33.59 (On)[/color] [color=red]40 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 6%[/color][/b]

[b][color=burgundy]HATTAH[/color][/b]
Merritt              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]97.25 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 97%[/color][/b]
Haller               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Maldonado            [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]3.48 (Off)[/color] [color=green]9.07 (On)[/color] [color=red]61.21 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 56%[/color][/b]
Blom                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red].12 (Off)[/color] [color=green]4.48 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 95%[/color][/b]
Welsh                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Diehm                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Daniel               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]11.19 (Off)[/color] [color=green]13.33 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 97%[/color][/b]
Murphy               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]15.28 (Off)[/color] [color=green]17.01 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 98%[/color][/b]
Meaney               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Templin              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Rothman              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Jakob                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red].47 (Off)[/color] [color=green]3.48 (On)[/color] [color=red]9.07 (Off)[/color] [color=green]61.21 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 45%[/color][/b]
Holt                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]4.48 (Off)[/color] [color=green]11.19 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 93%[/color][/b]
Marcotte             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]13.33 (Off)[/color] [color=green]15.28 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 98%[/color][/b]
Yoakum               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]82.37 (Off)[/color] [color=green]97.25 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 85%[/color][/b]
Gurley               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Lockhart             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Troester             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Waite                [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green].47 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 98%[/color][/b]
Girouard             [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green].12 (On)[/color] [color=red]17.01 (Off)[/color] [color=green]82.37 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 34%[/color][/b]

Total :  3600               Average :  90

Blom 14 v Ardito 10.75
Holt 6.5 v Ardito 0
Arney 3.25 v Daniel 2.25
Holt 27.75 v Arney 24
Waite 22.5 v Baylor 3.75
Welsh 26.75 v Blankenship 15
Burggraf 2.25 v Daniel 0
Burggraf-1.25 v Diehm 7.5
Burggraf 3 v Marcotte 0
Newkirk 9.75 v Daniel .75
Girouard 2.75 v Delano 3.25
Delano 22.5 v Murphy 15
Diehm 20.5 v Delgado 20.25
Jakob 2.5 v Gill 4.75
Maldonado 4.5 v Gill 0
Roach .5 v Girouard 0
Gurley 23.25 v Petersen 17.25
Gurley 40 v Roach 25
Haller 34 v Rhoden 31.75
Sproul 74.5 v Lockhart 69.75
Marcotte 39 v Muncy 36.25
Waldron 32.5 v Meaney 28.25
Merritt 6.25 v Pals 6.5
Murphy 4.5 v Muncy 6.5
Newkirk 5.75 v Yoakum 2.5
Rothman 18.5 v Norton 19.75
Yoakum 2.5 v Petersen 2.75
Raynor 65.75 v Troester 51
Roach 2 v Yoakum 0
Templin 12.5 v Wenig 21.5

 

[Mobbs]

So the matchups are :
Newkirk v Yoakum
Burggraf v Marcotte
Ardito v Holt
Baylor v Jakob
Norton v Rothman
Wenig v Templin
Waldron v Meaney
Muncy v Murphy
Arney v Daniel
Delgado v Diehm
Blankenship v Welsh
Delano v Blom
Gill v Maldonado
Rhoden v Haller
Pals v Merritt
Roach v Gurley
Sproul v Lockhart
Raynor v Troester
Petersen and Constantine on bench
Waite and Girouard on bench

Later matchups were :
Delano v Girouard
Baylor v Waite
Gill v Jakob
Ardito v Blom
Gill v Maldonado
Arney v Holt
Burggraf v Daniel
Muncy v Marcotte
Delano v Murphy
Petersen v Yoakum
Constantine v Blom
Ardito v Blom
Newkirk v Daniel
Roach v Yoakum
Petersen v Gurley
Gill v Jakob
Burggraf v Diehm
Roach v Girouard
Pals v Yoakum

TIME ON GROUND :

[b][color=burgundy]CARWARP[/color][/b]
Newkirk              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]33.2 (Off)[/color] [color=green]47.58 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 85%[/color][/b]
Burggraf             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]47.58 (Off)[/color] [color=green]78.25 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 69%[/color][/b]
Ardito               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]33.59 (Off)[/color] [color=green]40 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 93%[/color][/b]
Baylor               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Norton               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Wenig                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Waldron              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Muncy                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Arney                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Delgado              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]78.25 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 78%[/color][/b]
Blankenship          [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Delano               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Gill                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Rhoden               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Pals                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Roach                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Sproul               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Raynor               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Petersen             [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]33.2 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 66%[/color][/b]
Constantine          [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]33.59 (On)[/color] [color=red]40 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 6%[/color][/b]

[b][color=burgundy]HATTAH[/color][/b]
Merritt              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]97.25 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 97%[/color][/b]
Haller               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Maldonado            [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]3.48 (Off)[/color] [color=green]9.07 (On)[/color] [color=red]61.21 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 56%[/color][/b]
Blom                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red].12 (Off)[/color] [color=green]4.48 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 95%[/color][/b]
Welsh                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Diehm                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Daniel               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]11.19 (Off)[/color] [color=green]13.33 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 97%[/color][/b]
Murphy               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]15.28 (Off)[/color] [color=green]17.01 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 98%[/color][/b]
Meaney               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Templin              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Rothman              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Jakob                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red].47 (Off)[/color] [color=green]3.48 (On)[/color] [color=red]9.07 (Off)[/color] [color=green]61.21 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 45%[/color][/b]
Holt                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]4.48 (Off)[/color] [color=green]11.19 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 93%[/color][/b]
Marcotte             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]13.33 (Off)[/color] [color=green]15.28 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 98%[/color][/b]
Yoakum               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]82.37 (Off)[/color] [color=green]97.25 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 85%[/color][/b]
Gurley               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Lockhart             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Troester             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Waite                [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green].47 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 98%[/color][/b]
Girouard             [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green].12 (On)[/color] [color=red]17.01 (Off)[/color] [color=green]82.37 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 34%[/color][/b]

Total :  3600               Average :  90

Blom 14 v Ardito 10.75
Holt 6.5 v Ardito 0
Arney 3.25 v Daniel 2.25
Holt 27.75 v Arney 24
Waite 22.5 v Baylor 3.75
Welsh 26.75 v Blankenship 15
Burggraf 2.25 v Daniel 0
Burggraf-1.25 v Diehm 7.5
Burggraf 3 v Marcotte 0
Newkirk 9.75 v Daniel .75
Girouard 2.75 v Delano 3.25
Delano 22.5 v Murphy 15
Diehm 20.5 v Delgado 20.25
Jakob 2.5 v Gill 4.75
Maldonado 4.5 v Gill 0
Roach .5 v Girouard 0
Gurley 23.25 v Petersen 17.25
Gurley 40 v Roach 25
Haller 34 v Rhoden 31.75
Sproul 74.5 v Lockhart 69.75
Marcotte 39 v Muncy 36.25
Waldron 32.5 v Meaney 28.25
Merritt 6.25 v Pals 6.5
Murphy 4.5 v Muncy 6.5
Newkirk 5.75 v Yoakum 2.5
Rothman 18.5 v Norton 19.75
Yoakum 2.5 v Petersen 2.75
Raynor 65.75 v Troester 51
Roach 2 v Yoakum 0
Templin 12.5 v Wenig 21.5

 

[Mobbs]

Data was successfully recorded for these matchups :
Newkirk v Yoakum
Newkirk 5.75 v Yoakum 2.5

Burggraf v Marcotte
Burggraf 3 v Marcotte 0

Ardito v Holt
Holt 6.5 v Ardito 0

Norton v Rothman
Rothman 18.5 v Norton 19.75

Wenig v Templin
Templin 12.5 v Wenig 21.5

Waldron v Meaney
Waldron 32.5 v Meaney 28.25

Muncy v Murphy
Murphy 4.5 v Muncy 6.5

Arney v Daniel
Arney 3.25 v Daniel 2.25

Delgado v Diehm
Diehm 20.5 v Delgado 20.25

Blankenship v Welsh
Welsh 26.75 v Blankenship 15

Gill v Maldonado
Gill v Maldonado
Maldonado 4.5 v Gill 0

Rhoden v Haller
Haller 34 v Rhoden 31.75

Pals v Merritt
Merritt 6.25 v Pals 6.5

Roach v Gurley
Gurley 40 v Roach 25

Sproul v Lockhart
Sproul 74.5 v Lockhart 69.75

Raynor v Troester
Raynor 65.75 v Troester 51

Delano v Girouard
Girouard 2.75 v Delano 3.25

Baylor v Waite
Waite 22.5 v Baylor 3.75

Gill v Jakob
Gill v Jakob
Jakob 2.5 v Gill 4.75

Arney v Holt
Holt 27.75 v Arney 24

Burggraf v Daniel
Burggraf 2.25 v Daniel 0

Muncy v Marcotte
Marcotte 39 v Muncy 36.25

Delano v Murphy
Delano 22.5 v Murphy 15

Petersen v Yoakum
Yoakum 2.5 v Petersen 2.75

Ardito v Blom
Ardito v Blom
Blom 14 v Ardito 10.75

Newkirk v Daniel
Newkirk 9.75 v Daniel .75

Roach v Yoakum
Roach 2 v Yoakum 0

Petersen v Gurley
Gurley 23.25 v Petersen 17.25

Burggraf v Diehm
Burggraf-1.25 v Diehm 7.5

Roach v Girouard
Roach .5 v Girouard 0

````````````````````````````
No Data was recorded for these matchups, but reasons exist (see below) :

Baylor v Jakob
These two players started on each other, but Jakob went to the interchange within the first minute of the game, and they never had the opportunity to fight over the footy.

Delano v Blom
Blom was benched 12 seconds into the match. Hence no time for any competition between these two players, and no data.

Constantine v Blom
These two marked each other for just six minutes and the ball never came that way during that time, and no data was therefore recorded.

Pals v Yoakum
Yoakum came onto the ground at the 22 minute mark of the final quarter, and during the last 3 minutes of the match the ball never went near either of them

 

[Mobbs]

Blom's day. Off at start, back on, got plenty early, then dried up and the ball never went his, nor his opponent's, way much at all.

Blom 0 (On) .12 (Off) 4.48 (On) Total : 95%

-------------------------

Delano v Blom
Lasted 12 seconds before Blom ran to bench cause he forgot to have a borrie before the game.
1 : .12 - <<< Girouard is coming on to replace Blom >>>


Blom on bench


1 : 4.48 - <<< Blom is coming on to replace Holt >>>
Blom 14 v Ardito 10.75
(Blom had Ardito marking him twice. This is the total of both)
~~~


1 : 5.23 {rFP} - His kick is hurried - in the direction of Blom.
1 : 5.26 {rFP} - Blom can't mark but is able to bring the ball to ground.
1 : 5.31 {rFP} - Blom takes off.
1 : 5.35 {rFP} - Blom is crunched in a tackle by Ardito.
1 : 5.37 {lBP} - With the ball is Ardito.
1 : 5.41 {lBP} - A long looping handpass to Raynor.
~~~







1 : 9.23 {lBP} - He tries to find Ardito with a chip pass.
1 : 9.26 {lBP} - Oh a turnover. The kick is marked by Blom.
1 : 9.3 {rFP} - Blom assessing what lies ahead of him.
1 : 9.34 {rFP} - He has time to take a bounce.
1 : 9.38 {rFP} - Blom slams the ball at goal.
1 : 9.4 {rFP} - Put down your glasses - its a major.
Carwarp : 3.0.18
Hattah : 3.0.18
~~~



















1 : 17.3 {rBP} - The bounce favours Newkirk and he is off and running.
1 : 17.32 {rBP} - He has a bounce.
1 : 17.36 {rBP} - That's deliberate out of bounds.
1 : 17.4 {rFP} - Blom wants to get on with proceedings.
1 : 17.45 {rFP} - Blom slams the ball at goal.
1 : 17.46 {rFP} - And that just grazes the post.
Carwarp : 4.0.24
Hattah : 6.2.38
~~~



1 : 19.36 {lFP} - Yoakum to send the ball forward.
1 : 19.4 {rFP} - Handpasses to Blom.
1 : 19.44 {rFP} - This should be a certain goal.
1 : 19.48 {rFP} - And Blom doesn't disappoint us.
Carwarp : 5.0.30
Hattah : 7.2.44
~~~

1 : 20.46 {lBP} - Ardito screaming for the ball - and he is heard.
1 : 20.5 {lBP} - Blom gets a timely fist to the ball.
1 : 20.52 {FF} - The ball is now with Daniel.
~~~





















2 : 8.59 - <<< Constantine is coming on to replace Ardito >>>
Constantine v Blom
Constantine played on Blom for 6 minutes while Ardito went for a ciggie.










2 : 15 - <<< Ardito is coming on to replace Constantine >>>
Blom 14 v Ardito 10.75
(Blom had Ardito marking him twice. This is the total of both)



















2 : 21.53 {lHFF} - Waite with some space now.
2 : 21.58 {rFP} - He rewards the Blom lead.
2 : 22 {rFP} - Blom spills the mark.
2 : 22.04 {rFP} - Blom looking for a lead.
2 : 22.08 {rFP} - Blom from thirty metres.
2 : 22.12 {rFP} - One for the highlight reel. What a goal by Blom.
Carwarp : 14.5.89
Hattah : 11.3.69
~~~

















































3 : 3.58 {rFP} - A flat punt.
3 : 4.03 {rFP} - Ardito intercepts the kick and marks.
3 : 4.04 {lBP} - Taking the ball is Ardito.
3 : 4.09 {rHBF} - Throws it onto his boot.
3 : 4.13 {rHBF} - What a shocking kick - straight to Waite.
~~~



3 : 5.33 {lBP} - A long looping handpass to Roach.
3 : 5.37 {lBP} - A slick handpass goes to Ardito.
3 : 5.39 {rBP} - A lookaway handpass to Petersen.
~~~




3 : 7.43 {rBP} - Petersen wants to get on with proceedings.
3 : 7.47 {lBP} - Passes to Ardito by hand.
3 : 7.51 {rBP} - He kicks sideways towards Petersen.

























































End of match

 

[Mobbs]

It's true, I am awesome.


Blom beat Ardito today - but not by much.
I'm not sure that what Holt did to Ardito should be entirely legal.
It could be argued that Arney had the better game against Daniel - although there was very little in it.
Not much between Holt and Arney - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
Waite did a demolition job on Baylor.
Welsh came out tops over the brave Blankenship.
Burggraf won the bout with Daniel.
Diehm did a demolition job on Burggraf.
Burggraf was easily the winner in the clash with Marcotte.
Newkirk did a demolition job on Daniel.
Delano and Girouard were evenly matched.
Delano was slightly more polished than Murphy.
Diehm and Delgado were well-matched - there was no victor.
Gill did well against Jakob.
Maldonado gave Gill a hiding.
Not much between Roach and Girouard - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
Gurley did very well against Petersen.
Gurley came out tops over the brave Roach.
Haller and Rhoden were hard to separate - though Haller was slightly more effective.
Not much between Sproul and Lockhart - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
Marcotte either broke even with Muncy or vaguely bested him - it was hard to tell.
Not much between Waldron and Meaney - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
Pals and Merritt were well-matched - there was no victor.
Not much between Muncy and Murphy - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
Newkirk was slightly more polished than Yoakum.
Norton and Rothman were evenly matched.
Petersen and Yoakum were well-matched - there was no victor.
Raynor came out tops over the brave Troester.
Roach won the bout with Yoakum.
Wenig had the better of Templin.

 

[Mobbs]

Okay, added a second element to qualify that when player 1 had 3 kicks all day and player 2 had 0, while it was a beating, it was still a crap day for both players:


While the match-up was a bit of a side-show, Blom beat Ardito today - but not by much.
While overall a quiet day for both players, I'm not sure that what Holt did to Ardito should be entirely legal.
Neither having much reason to brag, it could be argued that Arney had the better game against Daniel - although there was very little in it.
In an epic battle, not much between Holt and Arney - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
In a bit of an exhibition, Waite did a demolition job on Baylor.
While not all all one-way, Welsh came out tops over the brave Blankenship.
In what was a very slow day for both, Burggraf won the bout with Daniel.
In what was a very slow day for both, Diehm did a demolition job on Burggraf.
In what was a very slow day for both, Burggraf was easily the winner in the clash with Marcotte.
In what was a very slow day for both, Newkirk did a demolition job on Daniel.
Spending most of the game pushing and shoving each other, Delano and Girouard were evenly matched.
In an enthralling contest, Delano was slightly more polished than Murphy.
In an epic battle, Diehm and Delgado were well-matched - there was no victor.
Spending most of the game pushing and shoving each other, Gill did well against Jakob.
Neither getting, near the ball much, Maldonado gave Gill a hiding.
Neither having much reason to brag, not much between Roach and Girouard - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
In an epic battle, Gurley did very well against Petersen.
While not all all one-way, Gurley came out tops over the brave Roach.
In an epic battle, Haller and Rhoden were hard to separate - though Haller was slightly more effective.
In an epic battle, not much between Sproul and Lockhart - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
In an epic battle, Marcotte either broke even with Muncy or vaguely bested him - it was hard to tell.
In an epic battle, not much between Waldron and Meaney - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
In a comparatively small-fry arm wrestle, Pals and Merritt were well-matched - there was no victor.
In a comparatively small-fry arm wrestle, not much between Muncy and Murphy - the former was probably a smidgeon better.
While very slim pickings for both players, Newkirk was slightly more polished than Yoakum.
Toe to toe throughout, Norton and Rothman were evenly matched.
Neither having much reason to brag, Petersen and Yoakum were well-matched - there was no victor.
While not all all one-way, Raynor came out tops over the brave Troester.
In what was a very slow day for both, Roach won the bout with Yoakum.
In an enthralling contest, Wenig had the better of Templin.

 

[Mobbs]

AFTER-MATCH SUMMARY :

[b][color=burgundy]CARWARP SENIORS Vs ELMHURST SENIORS[/color][/b]
CARWARP           8    4        14   5        18   9        21   12   138      
ELMHURST          2    1        6    4        9    8        11   10   76       
[b][color=burgundy]CARWARP    HO  K  M  H  T  FF FA G  B   Dt  ELMHURST    HO  K  M  H  T  FF FA G  B   Dt[/color][/b]
[color=blue]Muncy       0  2  0  2  0  0  0  0  0   10[/color]  [color=green]Ping         0  2  4  7  0  0  0  0  0   32[/color]
[color=blue]Constantin  0  8  2  0  0  0  1  0  0   27[/color]  [color=green]Desilva      0  5  4  7  0  0  0  0  0   41[/color]
[color=blue]Burggraf    0  0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0    4[/color]  [color=green]Bostick      0  13 0  9  5  2  0  1  1   86[/color]
[color=blue]Baylor      0  9  3  10 1  1  0  0  0   61[/color]  [color=green]Eubanks      0  10 4  7  2  1  2  0  0   59[/color]
[color=blue]Norton      0  7  5  5  4  2  4  0  0   52[/color]  [color=green]Jahnke       0  7  4  10 0  0  0  0  0   53[/color]
[color=blue]Petersen    0  7  5  9  0  0  1  0  0   51[/color]  [color=green]Combs        0  8  10 8  2  0  0  0  0   78[/color]
[color=blue]Newkirk     0  6  7  9  1  0  0  0  1   62[/color]  [color=green]Skeen        0  8  6  19 0  1  1  0  0   78[/color]
[color=blue]Wenig       0  18 7  11 0  0  1  0  0   94[/color]  [color=green]Parks        0  11 3  9  3  1  1  0  0   70[/color]
[color=blue]Arney       0  21 9  17 1  1  2  2  2  137[/color]  [color=green]Beem         0  11 4  5  3  0  2  0  0   61[/color]
[color=blue]Ardito      0  2  0  1  0  0  0  0  1    9[/color]  [color=green]Hartman      0  9  6  7  0  0  0  1  3   68[/color]
[color=blue]Blankenshi  0  2  4  12 4  0  2  0  0   52[/color]  [color=green]Luna         0  3  2  10 1  2  3  1  0   38[/color]
[color=blue]Delano      0  13 9  11 1  1  1  2  2  104[/color]  [color=green]Seifert      0  7  4  1  0  0  1  0  1   33[/color]
[color=blue]Gill        0  3  0  0  0  0  0  3  0   27[/color]  [color=green]Hobbs        0  5  0  0  1  0  0  3  2   39[/color]
[color=blue]Rhoden      0  6  1  0  1  0  0  4  2   51[/color]  [color=green]Hartsell     0  5  0  0  1  1  2  3  2   34[/color]
[color=blue]Pals        0  4  0  0  1  0  0  3  1   35[/color]  [color=green]Hetheringt   0  1  1  0  0  0  0  0  1    7[/color]
[color=blue]Roach       10 10 0  8  1  3  0  2  0   75[/color]  [color=green]Branch       18 14 0  15 4  2  0  2  0  120[/color]
[color=blue]Waldron     0  7  3  8  5  0  1  1  0   69[/color]  [color=green]Diaz         0  6  4  10 5  1  0  0  0   71[/color]
[color=blue]Raynor      0  18 0  7  8  2  1  4  1  124[/color]  [color=green]Piliero      0  12 0  12 7  4  2  0  0   86[/color]
[color=blue]Sproul      0  5  0  9  8  5  1  0  0   67[/color]  [color=green]Messenger    0  1  0  4  0  0  0  0  0   11[/color]
[color=blue]Delgado     0  9  4  6  1  0  0  0  2   57[/color]  [color=green]Miller       0  2  1  5  0  0  1  0  0   16[/color]

            [b]CAR[/b]   [b]ELM[/b]
Hitouts   : 10   18 
Kicks     : 157  140 
Marks     : 59   57 
Handballs : 127  145 
Tackles   : 37   34 
Frees For : 15   15 
Frees Ag. : 15   15 
Goals     : 21   11 
Behinds   : 12   10

GOAL BY GOAL :

[b][color=burgundy]First Quarter :[/color][/b]
.59 - Goal to Pals (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 6 point(s).[/color]
4.15 - Behind to Delano (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 7 point(s).[/color]
5.04 - Goal to Gill (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 13 point(s).[/color]
6.25 - Rushed behind to CARWARP[color=gray] - CARWARP by 14 point(s).[/color]
7.02 - Goal to Rhoden (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 20 point(s).[/color]
8.24 - Behind to Rhoden (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 21 point(s).[/color]
8.46 - Goal to Rhoden (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 27 point(s).[/color]
10.18 - Behind to Delano (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 28 point(s).[/color]
14.06 - Goal to Hobbs (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 22 point(s).[/color]
15.11 - Goal to Waldron (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 28 point(s).[/color]
17.59 - Goal to Bostick (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 22 point(s).[/color]
19.4 - Behind to Bostick (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 21 point(s).[/color]
20.56 - Goal to Arney (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 27 point(s).[/color]
22.27 - Goal to Pals (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 33 point(s).[/color]
23.22 - Goal to Roach (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 39 point(s).[/color]

[b][color=burgundy]Second Quarter :[/color][/b]
.51 - Goal to Hobbs (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 33 point(s).[/color]
4.46 - Goal to Branch (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 27 point(s).[/color]
5.29 - Goal to Raynor (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 33 point(s).[/color]
7.14 - Goal to Rhoden (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 39 point(s).[/color]
9.48 - Goal to Delano (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 45 point(s).[/color]
11.48 - Behind to Arney (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 46 point(s).[/color]
12.41 - Goal to Rhoden (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 52 point(s).[/color]
15.28 - Rushed behind to ELMHURST[color=gray] - CARWARP by 51 point(s).[/color]
15.57 - Behind to Hartman (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 50 point(s).[/color]
16.53 - Behind to Hetherington (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 49 point(s).[/color]
19.54 - Goal to Hobbs (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 43 point(s).[/color]
20.42 - Goal to Luna (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 37 point(s).[/color]
20.58 - Goal to Arney (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 43 point(s).[/color]
24.12 - Goal to Pals (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 49 point(s).[/color]

[b][color=burgundy]Third Quarter :[/color][/b]
25 - Goal to Raynor (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 55 point(s).[/color]
2.17 - Goal to Roach (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 61 point(s).[/color]
3.01 - Rushed behind to CARWARP[color=gray] - CARWARP by 62 point(s).[/color]
7.33 - Goal to Gill (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 68 point(s).[/color]
9.4 - Behind to Arney (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 69 point(s).[/color]
10.4 - Behind to Raynor (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 70 point(s).[/color]
11.41 - Behind to Newkirk (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 71 point(s).[/color]
15.06 - Goal to Delano (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 77 point(s).[/color]
15.49 - Behind to Seifert (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 76 point(s).[/color]
16.16 - Behind to Hartman (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 75 point(s).[/color]
16.4 - Goal to Hartsell (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 69 point(s).[/color]
20.21 - Goal to Hartsell (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 63 point(s).[/color]
20.58 - Behind to Hartman (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 62 point(s).[/color]
21.27 - Goal to Hartsell (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 56 point(s).[/color]
22.15 - Behind to Hobbs (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 55 point(s).[/color]

[b][color=burgundy]Final Quarter :[/color][/b]
1.26 - Goal to Branch (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 49 point(s).[/color]
5.23 - Behind to Hobbs (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 48 point(s).[/color]
6.2 - Behind to Hartsell (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 47 point(s).[/color]
6.58 - Goal to Hartman (ELMHURST)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 41 point(s).[/color]
8.56 - Behind to Delgado (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 42 point(s).[/color]
12.41 - Behind to Rhoden (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 43 point(s).[/color]
13.35 - Goal to Gill (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 49 point(s).[/color]
15.04 - Goal to Raynor (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 55 point(s).[/color]
23.2 - Goal to Raynor (CARWARP)[color=gray] - CARWARP by 61 point(s).[/color]
24.08 - Rushed behind to CARWARP[color=gray] - CARWARP by 62 point(s).[/color]

TIME ON GROUND :

[b][color=burgundy]CARWARP[/color][/b]
Newkirk              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]18.32 (Off)[/color] [color=green]22.55 (On)[/color] [color=red]49.36 (Off)[/color] [color=green]52.28 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 92%[/color][/b]
Burggraf             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]18.52 (Off)[/color] [color=green]57.53 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 61%[/color][/b]
Ardito               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]57.53 (Off)[/color] [color=green]63.15 (On)[/color] [color=red]89.22 (Off)[/color] [color=green]93.45 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 90%[/color][/b]
Baylor               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Norton               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Wenig                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]4.48 (Off)[/color] [color=green]7.12 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 97%[/color][/b]
Waldron              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]52.28 (Off)[/color] [color=green]75.1 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 77%[/color][/b]
Muncy                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]7.12 (Off)[/color] [color=green]18.32 (On)[/color] [color=red]63.15 (Off)[/color] [color=green]89.22 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 63%[/color][/b]
Arney                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Delgado              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]22.55 (Off)[/color] [color=green]49.36 (On)[/color] [color=red]93.45 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 66%[/color][/b]
Blankenship          [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Delano               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Gill                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Rhoden               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Pals                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Roach                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Sproul               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]75.1 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 75%[/color][/b]
Raynor               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Petersen             [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]4.48 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 94%[/color][/b]
Constantine          [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]18.52 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 80%[/color][/b]

[b][color=burgundy]ELMHURST[/color][/b]
Diaz                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]62.3 (Off)[/color] [color=green]64.47 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 97%[/color][/b]
Desilva              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Miller               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]6.43 (Off)[/color] [color=green]31.57 (On)[/color] [color=red]81.39 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 56%[/color][/b]
Eubanks              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Jahnke               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Combs                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Skeen                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Parks                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]27.07 (Off)[/color] [color=green]62.3 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 65%[/color][/b]
Ping                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]20.23 (Off)[/color] [color=green]27.07 (On)[/color] [color=red]31.57 (Off)[/color] [color=green]81.39 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 43%[/color][/b]
Hartman              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Luna                 [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Seifert              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Hobbs                [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Hartsell             [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Hetherington         [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Branch               [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Bostick              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [color=red]64.47 (Off)[/color] [color=green]78.37 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 86%[/color][/b]
Piliero              [color=green]0 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 100%[/color][/b]
Beem                 [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]20.23 (On)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 78%[/color][/b]
Messenger            [color=red]0 (Off)[/color] [color=green]6.43 (On)[/color] [color=red]78.37 (Off)[/color] [b][color=green]Total : 71%[/color][/b]

Total :  3600               Average :  89.99999

MATCH-UPS :

• In what was a very slow day for both, Combs was easily the winner in the clash with Ardito.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Ardito and Hetherington were hard to separate - though Ardito was slightly more effective.
• While worlds were set on fire, Hobbs massacred Ardito.
• While not all all one-way, Arney had the better of Skeen.
• In a bit of an exhibition, Baylor gave Seifert a bit of a touch-up.
• In quite a tussle, Newkirk was slightly more polished than Beem.
• While both players struggled to make an impact, Beem had the better of Waldron.
• In an epic battle, Blankenship did well against Jahnke.
• While very slim pickings for both players, Gill had the better of Bostick.
• While not all all one-way, Sproul had the better of Bostick.
• In a resume-material performance, Branch was easily the winner in the clash with Roach.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Burggraf had the better of Hartsell.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Hobbs was slightly more polished than Burggraf.
• In quite a display, Combs won the bout with Delgado.
• Regardless that this wasn't a huge game for either player, Combs had Newkirk's measure.
• In a comparatively small-fry arm wrestle, Hartsell did well against Constantine.
• In a resume-material performance, Delano won the bout with Eubanks.
• In an enthralling contest, Desilva came out tops over the brave Rhoden.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Pals and Diaz were hard to separate - though Pals was slightly more effective.
• While both players struggled to make an impact, Sproul was slightly more polished than Diaz.
• In an enthralling contest, Waldron came out tops over the brave Diaz.
• While the match-up was a bit of a side-show, Diaz and Wenig were hard to separate - though Diaz was slightly more effective.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Messenger did very well against Gill.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Gill came out tops over the brave Miller.
• Toe to toe throughout, Petersen either broke even with Hartman or vaguely bested him - it was hard to tell.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Hartman did well against Wenig.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Muncy and Hetherington were evenly matched.
• In what was a very slow day for both, Newkirk won the bout with Hetherington.
• In quite a display, Norton was easily the winner in the clash with Luna.
• In a comparatively small-fry arm wrestle, Pals did very well against Miller.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Parks did very well against Muncy.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Pals and Parks were hard to separate - though Pals was slightly more effective.
• Neither having much reason to brag, Pals was slightly more polished than Ping.
• In an enthralling contest, Parks had the better of Wenig.
• While not all all one-way, Raynor had the better of Piliero.
• Spending most of the game pushing and shoving each other, it could be argued that Ping had the better game against Waldron - although there was very little in it.

 

[croweater 41]

Hahahahaha Elmhurst great

 

[Mobbs]

LOL the random teams I chucked in were all old dead clubs : Carwarp, Hattah, Elmhurst, Amphitheatre, Landsborough and Moonambel.

 

[croweater 41]

All quality clubs of the local area as well

 

[Mobbs]

I always put in old clubs for my testing purposes, another league set up at the moment consists of Glenorchy, Halls Gap, Pomonal, Illawarra, Joel Rovers and either Marnoo or Woollen Mills I can't remember which in the latest incarnation. Basically a South Wimmera FL love-in.

By the way over the years there had also been teams in Callawadda, Lubeck, Wallaloo, Wallaloo East, Green's Creek, Concongella, Buangor, Mt Cole/Warrak, Barkly, Longerenong, Jung, ... would be awesome to one day have all these replicated in Qooty-run leagues

 

[croweater 41]

So many places that have absolutely nothing there except a sign welcome to......... Haha your wisdom is great.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Love this, think it would add another aspect to banter and games, and also could help with best and fairest counts.

Any chance of goals conceded to your direct opponent becoming a stat? Would help select AA backmen so that boncer can't make bullshit decisions like he did last season.

 

[boncer34]

I was the best HBF all year.

 

[Mobbs]

That would be awesome and I do intend to expand upon it when I get the chance.

Currently there is an issue where a bloke who kicked 5 goals straight, but only had five kicks and nothing else, was marked as having a slow day LOL. (Obviously its based on his low disposals and doesn't take into his account how damaging he was on the scoreboard).

Once I get to factor the scoring in to the form a bit better, then yeah, it'll be stuff like Tarks' suggestion that will make it more fun again.

Primarily though I need to get it to mention how long each matchup was for, Tarks beating Magro, losing to Barham, breaking even with Wearmouth means little until we know which one he spent two quarters on and which ones he was on for 2 minutes during rotations.

I used it in the Wonders/Roys praccy and people responded to it, so it seems to be a winner.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

That would be awesome and I do intend to expand upon it when I get the chance.

Currently there is an issue where a bloke who kicked 5 goals straight, but only had five kicks and nothing else, was marked as having a slow day LOL. (Obviously its based on his low disposals and doesn't take into his account how damaging he was on the scoreboard).

Once I get to factor the scoring in to the form a bit better, then yeah, it'll be stuff like Tarks' suggestion that will make it more fun again.

Primarily though I need to get it to mention how long each matchup was for, Tarks beating Magro, losing to Barham, breaking even with Wearmouth means little until we know which one he spent two quarters on and which ones he was on for 2 minutes during rotations.

I used it in the Wonders/Roys praccy and people responded to it, so it seems to be a winner.

Could you set an arbitary limit on how long they have to have played on each other for? > 30% game time would be fair, any less and the match up is probably insignificant in the context of the game.

Also, maybe condense the notes so that only duels where on player has clearly won (>10 point differential using your point system) are displayed. It gets cluttered reading the current output.

Now, an a completely different note, thinktanking here, is there the potential of adding a tagging function? Ie. each team can nominate a maximum of 2 players that play 100% of the game time against a certain opponent (that is, one player gets moved, so does his direct opponent so that they are still playing on one another?) Would preserve a bit in the way that boncer and lj could finally settle their little bragging contests?

 

[Mobbs]

Could you set an arbitary limit on how long they have to have played on each other for? > 30% game time would be fair, any less and the match up is probably insignificant in the context of the game.

Yeah I probably could, once I get the times sorted. It's a good idea too, although I'd do a lower %. Also, some players are going to want to know their details regardless. If I was on the bench, and came on for just 10 minutes of the match, onto a rampaging FF, I'd love to know what the Sim thought of my efforts. Maybe I could categorise, have the more brief matchups in a second grouping.

Also, maybe condense the notes so that only duels where on player has clearly won (>10 point differential using your point system) are displayed. It gets cluttered reading the current output.

Not sure I agree with this, as if two combatants were toe to toe all game in the midfield, I'd want to know whether the Sim thought one snuck home over the other. I get the point though, again, maybe categorisations : Trouncings, epic battles and nondescript smalltime irrelevancies. Separate headings, lower visibility as it works down.

Now, an a completely different note, thinktanking here, is there the potential of adding a tagging function? Ie. each team can nominate a maximum of 2 players that play 100% of the game time against a certain opponent (that is, one player gets moved, so does his direct opponent so that they are still playing on one another?) Would preserve a bit in the way that boncer and lj could finally settle their little bragging contests?

Oh man you don't ask much do you Hehe this would be really hard, but yes it'd be great if it could happen. Too hard basket for now, I'm afraid

 

[Tarkyn_24]

Not sure I agree with this, as if two combatants were toe to toe all game in the midfield, I'd want to know whether the Sim thought one snuck home over the other. I get the point though, again, maybe categorisations : Trouncings, epic battles and nondescript smalltime irrelevancies. Separate headings, lower visibility as it works down.

As the second most selfish captain at the Hawks, I think if that were the case I'd actually prefer player by player breakdowns of duels, though I don't know how much extra work that creates for loopy and your good self.

 

[Mobbs]

Well it shouldn't be any work for loopy, as the current situation is automatically added to the Forum Friendly stats. But opponent by opponent breakdown, phew, taking missus to a hosp visit today so will re-read and think about it when back. Would be possible, would be hard work.

 

[Tarkyn_24]

No probs Mobbs, I'd imagine it'd involve pairing comments along the lines of;

destroyed <Player 2> today
couldn't keep up with <Player 1> today

So that at the end of the game, you'd get

<Player 1>
===================
87:12 destroyed <Player 2> today
12:88 off the ground

<Player 2>
====================
87:12 couldn't keep up with <Player 1> today
6:54 broke even with <Player 3>
6:34 just better than <Player 4>

If that doesn't make any sense I'll illustrate with an example using names;

Farmer
===================
87:12 destroyed Lockyer today
12:88 off the ground

Lockyer
====================
87:12 couldn't keep up with Farmer today
6:54 broke even with Hasleby
6:34 just better than Walker

Obviously, it would take a ****load of effort, but it would also make the need for the gametime file obsolete largely.

Best of luck with your missus Mobbs too.

 

[Easty]

Yeah, good luck with that Mobbs.

Personally, I think the match-ups are a bit too 'wall-of-text' ish, but I don't have a simple solution for it.

The problem with either highlighting key matchups or only showing longer matchups is that it gives away too much information in regards to Mobb medal counts, and creates a larger gap between prominent positions.

I do like Tarks suggestion; the times are how long the matchup went for if I understand it correctly, and you could group that into a code box without it looking too messy.

 

[Mobbs]

Ahh I see, grouping by player. Yeah not a bad idea

Never heard of those players though Thought you'd like mine better.