Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
Respectfully disagree. Particularly if it's funding to state services. State services get away with not innovating and not putting into place vastly superior processes and efficiency gains because they get so much funding. They have no need to innovate because they are never stretched for staff and funding. Cutting them back every once in a while will cause them to think about how they can do things better for less money. You can't keep giving them more and more money all the time as they get extremely comfortable and for example, when a person leaves they immediately replace them instead of first considering whether the role should be re-defined or if it's even required at all.
Government agencies intentionally spend every cent in their budget because if they don't, they'll get that budget taken from them and put somewhere else. It's an insane system. They have to be forcibly cut occasionally so they trim the fat, re-work their processes and then you can put some money back into them. Right now, more money into these agencies is money wasted. They could re-allocate the funds to more construction and maintenance or heaven forbid - power generation.
As you say, that's not cutting spending per-se but rather re-allocating it so that we balance the best bang for buck - which Labor has been absolutely horrendous with in this state over the past decade. Because they are so run by unions, they continually pour money into very poor business models/processes in order to keep people in jobs as they fear union backlash. It's the classic case of the tail wagging the dog.
Maybe, but by way of an example relevant to the Port board I’d rather a bunch of union types get overpaid for the Alberton redevelopment than the Alberton redevelopment not happen at all.