Remove this Banner Ad

Poll Hodge versus Didak

  • Thread starter Thread starter MadMaxx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Ah yes, the good old poll. Why provide a basis in reason for an argument when you can make it a popularity contest?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hodge
.............
daylight
............
daylight
............
Anthony Rocca's nose
............
daylight
............
Didak
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by moe sizlak
wait 3 years, then w'ell see who's better.

Didak has a much better Kick than Hodge.
Hodge has a much better handball than Didak.

You can't be serious, I agree Didak has a pretty handy kick on him, but when it comes to being the best out of the two Hodge would win hands down. Ask any football follower that is not a Collingwood supporter.
 
Originally posted by moe sizlak
wait 3 years, then w'ell see who's better.

Didak has a much better Kick than Hodge.
Hodge has a much better handball than Didak.

Hodge is an accurate kick over 50m+, on either foot. I dont know about Didak, but he'd really have to be something special to have a better kick than Hodge.
 
Didak- crumbig forward who rarely ventures outside 50. Drifts in and out of games, doesn't like physical attention. Can duck behind the pack and kick a handy goal. Good kick, clever around goals.

Hodge- Versatile, agressive (can be a -ive eg. free kicks), phisical presence, can take a contested grab, kick from outside 50 and has a laser left foot. Leader on the field.

I know who I'd prefer.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Originally posted by ViperV10
Do you watch football with your eyes open? Didak is a good kick...but not in the league of Hodge.
Considering Hodge's apparently awesome kick, you'd expect a better than 54% accuracy in front of goal. Didak sits on 66% incidentally.
 
Originally posted by Hodgie_15
Didak- crumbig forward who rarely ventures outside 50. Drifts in and out of games, doesn't like physical attention. Can duck behind the pack and kick a handy goal. Good kick, clever around goals.
Did you just make that up? Seriously, I don't think you've seen much of Didak. He gets most of his possessions around 50 and beyond. The most dissapointing thing about Didak in 2003 and in Collingwood's forward play in general was the lack of the crumbing and behind the pack goals. Given the competitiveness of Collingwood's tall forwards in the air this is one of my main criticsisms of Daniher. Didak is clever around goals because he kicks set shots very straight from tight angles and kicks 55m left footers from angles by wheeling around into the space created by his quick movement up the ground. He isn't a crumbing forward nearly enough as he should be, he is a leading forward and as such has to compete with Tarrant and Rocca. I wish he would bludge off them a bit more and be more like you say he is.
Originally posted by Hodgie_15
Hodge- Versatile, agressive (can be a -ive eg. free kicks), phisical presence, can take a contested grab, kick from outside 50 and has a laser left foot. Leader on the field.

I know who I'd prefer.
I like the look of Hodge as a player and I'd add him to Collingwood's list any day but he has done little to warrant more than the potential tag. Nor has Didak for that matter.
 
Originally posted by Jars458
That wasn't the question.

But while we are asking...what has Didak done apart from kick a coupleof lucky goals?

Hodge by a country mile.
Jar's I'm nopt saying Didak has done much either. I've said all year he's been dissapointing. In fact I've had this argument with Collingwood fans on the Collingwood board and other sites before. IMO Didak has great potential but 2004 is delivery time. As for what he has actrually done, icing the game when no one else could againt Brisbane in the semi was handy as a recent example of what his skill set produces. He had a quiet night in a pocket, was played off the bench and then came on and was the difference in a match where goals were gold. He had a few other good games but has not yet killed anyone. MM eased him into footy. There are a few theories that MM held him back because he was too confident in himself. He certainly got very limited game time in his first 2 years. Some Collingwood supporters liken him to Daicos which always makes me scream. Daicos was a 30 possession midfielder or a 6 goal flanker on a good day at his age. Didak is nowhere near that and will never be in Daicos' league but who is? He will be a good footballer. So will Hodge. I reckon Hodge will be more steady and Didak will be more brilliant or more a game breaker.
 
Originally posted by Porthos
Considering Hodge's apparently awesome kick, you'd expect a better than 54% accuracy in front of goal. Didak sits on 66% incidentally.

Yes you would expect it to be better, if Hodge spent the year up forward. When passing to team mates Hodge is lightning..but he didn't kick at goal a lot during the year while playing either midfield or where he played most, down back.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom