Poor = Tvn

dk*punter

Debutant
Suspended
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Posts
79
Likes
0
Thread starter #1
Has anyone notice in the last year and a half how poor tvn looks and the camera's for the signal. If you put on sky and then tvn you will notice it. And also like the production, can anyone remember the other week on racing review when they came back from the beaten jocks and a chick was putting make-up on bruce clarks face. I reackon they should lift there game and put some more money into better signals and cameras.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PLSC

Club Legend
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Posts
2,731
Likes
2
Location
LA
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Richmond
#2
YES!!!!!

i was pissing myself when i saw clarky getting his touchup

and yeh the quality is balls i usually switch to sky for the race and then go to the pre/post stuff on tvn

who cares but $12 cant complain
 

Em4N

Debutant
Joined
Nov 9, 2006
Posts
80
Likes
0
Location
Klemzig
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Eagles-WWT
#4
YES!!!!!

i was pissing myself when i saw clarky getting his touchup

and yeh the quality is balls i usually switch to sky for the race and then go to the pre/post stuff on tvn

who cares but $12 cant complain
What advantages if any does TVN have over Fox, is there more information pre/post race or things just better presented but with poor picture quality ??
 

dk*punter

Debutant
Suspended
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Posts
79
Likes
0
Thread starter #5
What advantages if any does TVN have over Fox, is there more information pre/post race or things just better presented but with poor picture quality ??
Tvn is alot better then sky channel on Racing. Tvn Goes through every horse in the field and has interviews with jockeys and trainer also. I would much rather have tvn then sky but i wish tvn would do something about the vision.
 
Top Bottom