Remove this Banner Ad

Poor = Tvn

  • Thread starter Thread starter dk*punter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

dk*punter

Debutant
Suspended
Joined
Nov 4, 2006
Posts
79
Reaction score
0
Has anyone notice in the last year and a half how poor tvn looks and the camera's for the signal. If you put on sky and then tvn you will notice it. And also like the production, can anyone remember the other week on racing review when they came back from the beaten jocks and a chick was putting make-up on bruce clarks face. I reackon they should lift there game and put some more money into better signals and cameras.
 
YES!!!!!

i was pissing myself when i saw clarky getting his touchup

and yeh the quality is balls i usually switch to sky for the race and then go to the pre/post stuff on tvn

who cares but $12 cant complain
 
YES!!!!!

i was pissing myself when i saw clarky getting his touchup

and yeh the quality is balls i usually switch to sky for the race and then go to the pre/post stuff on tvn

who cares but $12 cant complain

Still $12 more than i pay for sky.
 
YES!!!!!

i was pissing myself when i saw clarky getting his touchup

and yeh the quality is balls i usually switch to sky for the race and then go to the pre/post stuff on tvn

who cares but $12 cant complain

What advantages if any does TVN have over Fox, is there more information pre/post race or things just better presented but with poor picture quality ??
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What advantages if any does TVN have over Fox, is there more information pre/post race or things just better presented but with poor picture quality ??

Tvn is alot better then sky channel on Racing. Tvn Goes through every horse in the field and has interviews with jockeys and trainer also. I would much rather have tvn then sky but i wish tvn would do something about the vision.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom