Psd

[no. 4]

I know that we have agreed to take Ackland in the draft but with the amount of delistings does anyone think it's possible we will go with two picks into the PSD. I think it's only us and Port that room for seven players. Wouldn't we be pushing it by picking up a kid in the 70's, depending on who is in the PSD should we go for two players?

 

[Jeremias]

No.

We should take picks 1,17,19,35,51 and 67 in the ND, and pick 1 in the PSD.

Definitely shouldn't pass on pick 67.

 

[Heff]

Definitely shouldn't pass on pick 67.

i would for perry if he was available

 

[vinny]

This is the first time in ten years we havent given away
draft picks for **** opposition players during trade week.
This I am very pleased with therefore we use all our picks
on the best available talent when our picks come around.
Those 6 kids we pick hopefully form the nucleus of a great team
for the future.

 

[bluesfan]

This is the first time in ten years we havent given away
draft picks for **** opposition players during trade week.
This I am very pleased with therefore we use all our picks
on the best available talent when our picks come around.
Those 6 kids we pick hopefully form the nucleus of a great team
for the future.

Totally agree with you on that statement vinny. This is the so called 'Super-Draft' so like many Carlton people out there, I hope that the blokes that we pick will help build our future. Not really keen on us getting Ackland but he'll do in the short-term. With Frenchy's retirement, it really shows that our ruck stocks our really weak and bad. We must pick a ruckman in the National Draft.

 

[HBF]

No.

We should take picks 1,17,19,35,51 and 67 in the ND, and pick 1 in the PSD.

Definitely shouldn't pass on pick 67.

Why do I keep agreeing with you J?
This cannot be a good thing.

 

[Jeremias]

i would for perry if he was available

If we pass on that pick, it is no certainty that Perry will still be available. In fact, I am very confident in saying he won't be around by our 2nd PSD pick. Then we are left with picking up another kid.

Not worth the risk.

 

[blue_kings]

does deluca retiring make any impact on our psd? like a second pick in it? or isn't that possible?
or does it just mean we have another pick in the draft?
i'm confused!

 

[Swishhh10]

It just means we'll be able to get both Clokes now.....oh hang on, they're not letting Dennis decide on players anymore are they?

 

[HBF]

It just means we'll be able to get both Clokes now.....oh hang on, they're not letting Dennis decide on players anymore are they?

Could we promote Jackson onto the rookie list now?
Or we take pick 83 in the ND or two picks in the PSD?