- Joined
- Mar 2, 2007
- Posts
- 44,009
- Reaction score
- 66,062
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Cowboys, Packers, Scorchers
Sandilands can renegoiate a contract, because if he wants 2 years, 3 years, 4 years, he gets it because the over 27 rule doesnt apply to him.
Is it right that they have a rule that applys to some, and not to others?
Of course it is. Footy club contracts always work on a hierarchy where the better players are favoured. We aren't pinko commie bastards after all. Otherwise you might as well argue that Hall deserves the same contract as Hill next year.
Hase is a good player but he's body is older than his years and the club obviously figured it was better to be safe than sorry. It's not like he's been told the one year deal will be his last - if he keeps playing well he could theoretically sign another 5 one year deals after this one.




