Remove this Banner Ad

Environment Q+A session: Solar power tariff?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Upton Sinclair

Norm Smith Medallist
Suspended
Jul 31, 2011
5,441
2,017
AFL Club
Collingwood
Solar power Q+A

Somebody PM'd me today asking a few questions about solar but the reply i typed was too long for PM (limited to 1000 characters), so I've started a thread to discuss all things solar. If anyone else has any other questions I'm happy to help where possible :)

Now there are a few settings on it however one particular setting isq "tall=xx hours" would this be the amount of hours solar has provided on electricity use?

Hi Bosun,

What's the brand name of the inverter? Display setting vary widely but if you can give me the make and model I might be able to pull up a manual pretty easily.

You can also check you meter-box too, most digital meters will have gross/net consumption figures listed, the difference should be your daily generation rate.

]I assume this means that solar I the first call on electricity usage then when it's not sufficient it reverts to the grid?

Are you in in Victoria? If so then, yes, that's about right. Have you spoken to your energy retailer to find out what tariff you are on?

It will depend on exactly when the system was connected to the grid and knowing that is important in understanding how to best utilise to power you generate.

For instance, if your system went in on the PFIT (premium feed-in tariff) $0.60 tariff then you aim should be to try and use as little power as possible during the day (between, say, 10 Am - 5 PM) so that you feed as much as possible back into the grid and get paid for it.

If, however, you're on SFIT (standard, $0.23) or TFIT (transitional $0.25) then your best bet is to try and use the power up during the day and make saving that way.

It also depends on the size of the system, if it's a big 2+ kW system then if you're on SFIT or TFIT then you'll unlikely use all of the power you generate so will have to feed it back into the grid.

Also, make sure you shop around for retailers, the big boys like AGL and Origin will always give you an additional $0.08/$0.06 respectively per kW/h and it can make a big difference if you're on SFIT or TFIT.

Seeing as though the system is about a year old I think you should be on PFiT, assuming the previous owners applied through their retailer.

As a rough rule-of-thumb, the following formula should help give a general idea on what returns you'll get from the system:

Let's say you have a 1.5 kW system, that means that averaged out across the year the system should run for about 4 hours a day (in Victoria, Zone 4) - so 1.5 x 4 = 6 kW/h per day as a yearly average (summer more, winter less).

Now, if you consume all of the electricity you produce and you're paying about $0.24 for the electricity you buy from the grid, then that gives you a minimum daily saving of $1.44 per day, or about $130 off your quarterly bill.

If you are on PFiT, then the maximum saving possible would be if you fed all the electricity you generate back into the grid (will never happen, you'll always have at a bare minimum a fridge and freezer running during the day, but the more you minimise daylight usage the closer you'll get to this upper-ceiling), so 6 kW/h x $0.60 = $3.60 per day, or about $320 off your quarterly bill.

Obviously, if on SFiT or TFiT adjust the calculations for those tariff rates.

A lot of people missed out on PFiT when the Vic gov cancelled it last year, so don't be surprised if you are on SFiT. If so, call up one of the big boys and get them to put you on TFiT, if you were an origin customer they'll give you $0.31 per kW/h.

A bit of a disclaimer though, I haven't had any contact with the retailers for a while now and they are very much liable to change the way they do things without notice, so you'll definitely need to confirm all of the figures here with them.

That's probably a lot for you to absorb right now, don't hesitate to hit me up if you need me to clarify anything and get back to me with the inverter details.

Also, see if you can find any paperwork on who installed it and what panels they've used, you'll be able to find out a fair bit about the system and what tariff you're on from the paperwork.​
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #2
Also, one thng to bear in mind, the figures I've used is based on a north facing roof with an inclination of between 20 - 30 degrees. If your system is installed on anything other than true north then it is going to reduce the output, calculating exactly how much is very much dependent on your geographical location.

The BCSE publish a matrix in their guidelines for solar installers that tracks the level of iiradiance according to a rough geological location, azimuth plane and inclination

http://www.glenclarkco.com.au/uploads/37970/ufiles/Grid Connect PV System Guidelines.pdf

Search for your nearest capital city, select the azimuth plane (e.g north = 0, south = 180 etc), then select the inclination of the panels (an average pitched roof in Australia will be about 20 - 30 degrees), then the spot on the matrix will tell you how much efficiency you should be getting.

So a house in Melbourne facing north-east, pitched at 20 degrees will mean the system will be running at a loss of > 6% which then needs to be factored in when calculating the output of the system (e.g. subtract 6% from the 6 kW/h per day and it will give a reasonably accurate idea of what you should be generating from a 1.5 kW system.

It's a very handy guide because if you are contemplating getting a system but are put off because, say, the pitch of your roof is low, you might find that depending on where you are you might get better performance on a low pitch off true north than you would from a high pitch bang on true north. This is especially the case the further north you go where lower pitches are more optimal.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Hi Upton Sinclair, you seem pretty knowledgeable so here is my question... what do you think of having West-facing solar panels so that you can take advantage of the afternoon sun during peak usage?

Could this be beneficial now or in the future when peak pricing becomes more popular?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
North is premium, West results in efficiency losses, period, but depending on where you are and the pitch of the roof they are installed on will dictate to what degree. See the BCSE guidelines linked to in the OP. The other thing you need to consider is the fact that the afternoon tends to be hotter and the panels lose efficiency as they heat up - it can get complicated but when you start crunching the numbers and looking at the temperature co-efficiency of your panels then it might be better to have them on the East rather than West (if that's an option). There's definitely no single answer, every system should ideally be designed to suit your individual circumstances.

And, yes, once time of use metering is rolled out then having solar on a net tariff is always going to be beneficial because the panels generate power in those peak times, which is the costliest period to provide energy to a household (it actually costs a lot more to provide power during those tiumes than you get charged for it, check out these two eye-opening articles to get an idea of the true costs of peak-load:

http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/the-hidden-cost-of-infinite-energy-part-1/19/

http://www.theglobalmail.org/feature/the-hidden-cost-of-infinite-energy-part-2/36/ )

Hopefully, one day, if we adopt a 21st C energy grid, having solar could make you money not for what you feed into the grid but rather for the energy you don't draw from the grid - the cost of transmission, rather than the cost of generating the electricity, is by far the costliest part of the $/kW/h you are charged by the retailers.

Currently, we have spent about $16B providing the infrastructure for the four or five days a year when the grid hits maximum capacity simply to prevent blackputs. And we'll be spending tens of billions ovr the next five years increasing that capacity. It's sheer lunacy.
 
Which is roughly the amount of money the government would have left if it supplied solar panels to every house.

Not to mention the batteries. A battery bank cost 4 - 5 times more than the panels themselves.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Environment Q+A session: Solar power tariff?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top