If a company associated with the NRL club a player plays for pays him for being the face of their company is this considered part of the salary cap?
Sure if the company has nothing to do with the club then it wouldnt be, because the player would have the same opportunity for that income at any other club, but what if it was a roosters player getting paid by Samsung?
Sure if the company has nothing to do with the club then it wouldnt be, because the player would have the same opportunity for that income at any other club, but what if it was a roosters player getting paid by Samsung?



