Game Day Rd 11 Carlton v Essendon Game Day Thread

[PAdman]

I come here as a neutral, I'd like thoughts on the umpiring tonight from your perspective. I thought tonight was excellently umpired with the whistle being put away all game, like it was a granny being played.

 

[JamisonRun40]

Wookie I don't know maybe gamble with Laidler. Cannot wait for AC to come back in.

 

[Dikfeld]

It makes you wonder what the outs could of done. Maybe Yarran was too cold and couldn't get started. I think they should subbed someone off at half time.

I thought everyone played well except for the smalls. What was Armfield's role this week.

Started on hibberd for the first half, Hibberd didn't get any of it but then got moved off him and stuff knows... He and betts were getting none of it, they needed a run through the middle to try and get into the game...

 

[rp84]

[quite="The Old Dark Navy's, post: 28601220, member: 467"]Let's not get into a circular argument. I believe we looked the more dangerous side and controlled the play for longer. I believe the game should not have been up for grabs as we should have iced it well before then. You can think different, but please don't tell me what to think.

Take round 1 for instance. If Yarran had kicked that last goal, I would have said we stole that match. It works both ways.[/quote]
No It doesn't campaigner
We lost.

 

[Stig O'Hara]

Having a Yoko, kids.

Got this sprayed cabbage called, whatever, it's sprayed blerrh, and it is a beast.

It's real, it's legal, quite frankly, I could not operate a fence on this.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

No It doesn't silly
We lost.

Mate, don't be a dick. As if I don't have enough to deal with, with the influx of feral opposition supporters tonight, without our own posters deciding to be argumentative and difficult.

 

[rp84]

Se="The Old Dark Navy's, post: 28602301, member: 467"]Mate, don't be a dick. As if I don't have enough to deal with, with the influx of feral opposition supporters tonight, without our own posters deciding to be argumentative and difficult.[/quote]
Sorry. No harm no foul. You jist managed to mention the two games that hurt most. Yarran being a hog, then white missing a 50/50

 

[40yearBLUE]

Why have I been banned from the vent thread? My oppinion that our losses start in the board room are as valid as blaming Lucas or a goal umpire?

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Why have I been banned from the vent thread? My oppinion that our losses start in the board room are as valid as blaming Lucas or a goal umpire?

No, they're not. You are only coming here to run a negative agenda, that ends up just baiting everybody. We all know your opinion. In fact, after 40 years, it is apparently the only one you have anymore. Why repeat it at every opportunity. Don't answer that 40 year. I have trolls coming out the proverbial tonight, and you are just making it harder.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Why have I been banned from the vent thread? My oppinion that our losses start in the board room are as valid as blaming Lucas or a goal umpire?

No, they're not. You are only coming here to run a negative agenda, that ends up just baiting everybody. We all know your opinion. In fact, after 40 years, it is apparently the only one you have anymore. Why repeat it at every opportunity. Don't answer that 40 year. I have trolls coming out the proverbial tonight, and you are just making it harder.

 

[Stig O'Hara]

Why have I been banned from the vent thread? My oppinion that our losses start in the board room are as valid as blaming Lucas or a goal umpire?

I'll tell you why, you carry on like a 3 ringed bird, on your own 3 ringed fame.

.........and you turn up when WE get done..........you turd.


And you say, I say this and I say that and I, I, I you ****ing pain in the arse.

I might be dickhead Every 2, but I am hear EVERY WEEK.

Go clean some shoes,............boy.

 

[DJMacca]

Why have I been banned from the vent thread? My oppinion that our losses start in the board room are as valid as blaming Lucas or a goal umpire?

Give it up mate please, it's not the time

 

[40yearBLUE]

No, they're not. You are only coming here to run a negative agenda, that ends up just baiting everybody. We all know your opinion. In fact, after 40 years, it is apparently the only one you have anymore. Why repeat it at every opportunity. Don't answer that 40 year. I have trolls coming out the proverbial tonight, and you are just making it harder.

Another poster is asking the same question, how long before the MM effect kicks in? So they can ask that but I cant because its my only opinion now? is that how it works? If I post on more than one topic I can have my pov on here but if I only have one op then I cant? Is that your contention?

I am not being rude to anyone, I have a valid idea that you are censoring because others might not like my pov. Is that how it works around here too? If you hold a controversial view keep it to yourself?

 

[Stig O'Hara]

and when I say Boy it has impact!

Get the **** out cherry picker.

 

[Stig O'Hara]

Another poster is asking the same question, how long before the MM effect kicks in? So they can ask that but I cant because its my only opinion now? is that how it works? If I post on more than one topic I can have my pov on here but if I only have one op then I cant? Is that your contention?

I am not being rude to anyone, I have a valid idea that you are censoring because others might not like my pov. Is that how it works around here too? If you hold a controversial view keep it to yourself?

You ought watch your word's, boy.

You've near done your time with me.

 

[40yearBLUE]

You ought watch your word's, boy.

You've near done your time with me.

And I am the one having posts deleted and being banned from threads. I have awoken in bizarro land again where black is white and up is down.

 

[40yearBLUE]

You ought watch your word's, boy.

You've near done your time with me.

Have you tried the ignore button....just sayin.

 

[40yearBLUE]

Another poster is asking the same question, how long before the MM effect kicks in? So they can ask that but I cant because its my only opinion now? is that how it works? If I post on more than one topic I can have my pov on here but if I only have one op then I cant? Is that your contention?

I am not being rude to anyone, I have a valid idea that you are censoring because others might not like my pov. Is that how it works around here too? If you hold a controversial view keep it to yourself?

An answer from a mod would not be too much to ask would it....or you could just delete my posts and give me another week off. Worked last week.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Another poster is asking the same question, how long before the MM effect kicks in? So they can ask that but I cant because its my only opinion now? is that how it works? If I post on more than one topic I can have my pov on here but if I only have one op then I cant? Is that your contention?

I am not being rude to anyone, I have a valid idea that you are censoring because others might not like my pov. Is that how it works around here too? If you hold a controversial view keep it to yourself?

I'm censoring you because I have had dozens of reports, have probably 30 cards to hand out, everybody else must have been at the game, and then I get our own supporters being self serving, which baits others and causes more reports and meanwhile the lurking likers are having a laugh.

It's not a discussion for a post game thread. It's just reactive and extremely thin rationale. That is coming from someone who disagreed with what happened last year every bit as much as you. I just managed to pull my head in.

 

[40yearBLUE]

I'm censoring you because I have had dozens of reports, have probably 30 cards to hand out, everybody else must have been at the game, and then I get our own supporters being self serving, which baits others and causes more reports and meanwhile the lurking likers are having a laugh.

It's not a discussion for a post game thread. It's just reactive and extremely thin rationale. That is coming from someone who disagreed with what happened last year every bit as much as you. I just managed to pull my head in.

If its not a discussion for a post game thread, then when is a valid time....November? It is a valid point of view and cencoring it because others wont like it....really, that is what we mean by "put it out there". Shouldnt that really say "put it out there if it is popular"?

 

[Stig O'Hara]

If its not a discussion for a post game thread, then when is a valid time....November? It is a valid point of view and cencoring it because others wont like it....really, that is what we mean by "put it out there". Shouldnt that really say "put it out there if it is popular"?

.....Man, you are that boring guy in the pub.

Shut the **** *p/

 

[MrsEddieBetts]

If its not a discussion for a post game thread, then when is a valid time....November? It is a valid point of view and cencoring it because others wont like it....really, that is what we mean by "put it out there". Shouldnt that really say "put it out there if it is popular"?

Can you just give it a rest for tonight like he's asked you to several times? I don't mean to be rude, but everyone here already knows your point of view on this and we're all very emotional and highly strung at the moment, and you're not helping at all.

 

[Silvagnis]

Another poster is asking the same question, how long before the MM effect kicks in? So they can ask that but I cant because its my only opinion now? is that how it works? If I post on more than one topic I can have my pov on here but if I only have one op then I cant? Is that your contention?

I am not being rude to anyone, I have a valid idea that you are censoring because others might not like my pov. Is that how it works around here too? If you hold a controversial view keep it to yourself?

Do you honestly expect Malthouse to come in to turn over the list and change the mindset in 11 rounds?

Perhaps you should apportion some blame to his predecessor who hasn't developed the list to the point that they're ruthless and can finish sides off.

Lucas was poor after half time, but he was on the outer under Ratten. That's an improvement that possibly wouldn't have occured if Ratten had stayed on. Needs to improve his intensity, but he won't be a bust with just 27 games under his belt.

We've lost winnable games like North, but we haven't been blown away and given up like last year. Mick has the players more than Ratten who lost them with the way we caved last year.

 

[ODNBlue]

If its not a discussion for a post game thread, then when is a valid time....November? It is a valid point of view and cencoring it because others wont like it....really, that is what we mean by "put it out there". Shouldnt that really say "put it out there if it is popular"?

40yearBLUE. We all know your position. While I'm sure you don't really care, you don't garner a lot of sympathy for your views when you only have one position. You don't celebrate the wins. You don't commiserate the losses. All you do is shove your opinion down people's throats. I can't understand what benefit you get from doing this. It's a little sad really. If football has become so painful and ugly for you, why don't you do something else... anything else... It'll be better for your heart and your soul if you just move on. Do it soon.

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Yeah November sounds fine. Obviously you didn't pay any attention to me saying I am flat out dealing with other issues right now without having to go in and read reports or delete responses to your repetitive agenda stuff. Putting a lid on the opportunities the loss provides you for a moment would be nice. I'm also not going to let you monopolise my time any further.