- Joined
- Apr 13, 2006
- Posts
- 34,887
- Reaction score
- 84,279
- Location
- The Bitter End
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Just recieved a fine for $512. Wow.
Travelling along a major road last Monday evening when I am heading towards an intersection that I know well and also know there is a red light camera at. I'm at the the second arrow along the road and the light changes to orange. The natural reaction is either to slam on the breaks or accelarate through the intersection because you know there is a speed camera there - I did the latter.
Result I get a speeding fine for doing 71 km's per hour plus I also got booked by the red light camera. Now not knowing that there was a speed camera in there also, I can accept that I was probably speeding, but being aware that there was a red light camera there I can not accept that I was also going through a red light - I know everyone probably says it, but the light was orange when I went through.
I just think you should be done for one or the other and it screams of ridiculous revenue raising. I mean seriously $512 for going 71km's in a 60 zone and travelling through an orange light seems freaking excessive. I have the ability to pay for it but I'd imagine this kind of a fine for something so relatively minor would be a major blow for a lot of people. I'm probably going to be accussed of having a whinge and the law's the law, but Jesus, does the punishment fit the crime?
Travelling along a major road last Monday evening when I am heading towards an intersection that I know well and also know there is a red light camera at. I'm at the the second arrow along the road and the light changes to orange. The natural reaction is either to slam on the breaks or accelarate through the intersection because you know there is a speed camera there - I did the latter.
Result I get a speeding fine for doing 71 km's per hour plus I also got booked by the red light camera. Now not knowing that there was a speed camera in there also, I can accept that I was probably speeding, but being aware that there was a red light camera there I can not accept that I was also going through a red light - I know everyone probably says it, but the light was orange when I went through.
I just think you should be done for one or the other and it screams of ridiculous revenue raising. I mean seriously $512 for going 71km's in a 60 zone and travelling through an orange light seems freaking excessive. I have the ability to pay for it but I'd imagine this kind of a fine for something so relatively minor would be a major blow for a lot of people. I'm probably going to be accussed of having a whinge and the law's the law, but Jesus, does the punishment fit the crime?






