Robbo apologises ....

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

My personal favourite part is

"WADA's burden of proof was a flimsy Comfortable Satisfaction. How about Comfortable Doubt? "

Comfortably there is no doubt that a higher percentage of Essendon players doped than Chinese swimmers doped in the 90s.

Because they only doped the girls not the guys. Essendon doped everyone but 1.
 
I have Murdoch block because I refuse to support a treasonous American.

Can someone give me the TLDR version?

Robbo: Its not fair. Waaah Waaaah Waaaah.....

Basically, thats it.

Oh and the level of proof required leaves room for comfortable doubt. The AFL's honorable men cleared him so why should we believe the other mob.

Seriously, he's acting like a 2 year old having a tantrum because like joondalupj and a few other clowns if there is not absolute proof then its not good enough....and if there was absolute proof, well thats not good enough either
 
Robbo: Its not fair. Waaah Waaaah Waaaah.....

Basically, thats it.

Oh and the level of proof required leaves room for comfortable doubt. The AFL's honorable men cleared him so why should we believe the other mob.

Seriously, he's acting like a 2 year old having a tantrum because like joondalupj and a few other clowns if there is not absolute proof then its not good enough....and if there was absolute proof, well thats not good enough either

Who is he talking about though? And what?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top