Remove this Banner Ad

Robert Walls article.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

GlovemanGayfer

Senior List
Joined
Oct 16, 2003
Posts
286
Reaction score
0
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Collingwood
Robert Walls annoys me! He hates collingwood and has little respect for us. However what annoyed me about Friday nights effort was that I knew this type of thing would start coming out. People do not respect our efforts and Friday showed why. I don't agree with aspects of this article and would still run Walls down if I saw him crossing the street but I think that as fans we need to be prepared for the public flogging we will get if we put in a few more games like Friday. Nick Steven's (or similar) was neccesary for us this year, Buck's keeps showing why he's a modern day champion but he can't go it alone (again).
I think the time has come to bite the bullet. If this season is not going to be a productive one lets make it positive by getting rid of the dead wood and giving the younger guys the experience required to get to the next step. As Walls points out Wlakers 9 minutes on Friday was a joke, Cloke being played in 5 different positions over a game similarly lacks any continuity for the player. We all know where our problems lie and where we are going to be in a very short time if things don't change and whike I have great respect for MM Friday raised some questons that have to be answered. We have the Bulldogs, Brisbane and Freo in the next 3 weeks and honestly could be 0 and 4 at the end of the first month. Bring on Richards, C Clokes, Shaws etc and kick Williams, McKee and Shane "the imposter" O'Bree back to Willi!

Pies rely on super six
By Robert Walls
March 30, 2004

Sure, Collingwood has played off in the past two grand finals, but it is not a top-class team. Since round one 2002, the Pies have won 32 games and lost 18. Really good sides don't lose 18 games in a two-year period.

Mick Malthouse's team has earnt respect with some gutsy performances. Many of these have come on greasy grounds in wet, windy conditions. The strong, experienced bodies of Nathan Buckley, Scott Burns and Paul Licuria have thrived in the heavier going. But there are flaws in the Magpie make-up.

Increasingly, there is an unhealthy reliance on the team's super six: the talls Chris Tarrant, Anthony Rocca and Josh Fraser added to Buckley, Burns and Licuria. All played often and well last season. When this happens the rest follow along in the slipstream. The coach would hate to witness and admit to this fact, but it is increasingly becoming a fact of life. Of the rest, some are "good ordinary" players and some are just plain "ordinary".

That the Magpies couldn't snare Nick Stevens or Nathan Brown in the off-season will hurt them. A touch of class is desperately needed. Last Friday night, on a fast track, they were found wanting.

They were killed in the ruck. Fraser and Steve McKee scrambled for 18 hitouts to Brad Ottens's and Greg Stafford's 39.


At ground level, the Tigers went in hard to win the clearances. Collingwood prides itself on winning clearances, but other teams have taken note. Richmond realised you had to fight fire with fire, so tough goers in Kane Johnson and Mark Coughlan, along with desperate speedsters in Andrew Krakouer and David Rodan, took the honours with 39 clearances to 31.

In fact, the Tigers' ferocity was like the Brisbane Lions's in last year's grand final. And again, the heat was too much for some Pies who jumped out of the way. Other clubs will note the tackle count being 48-34, Richmond's way.

Under stress, the Pies put the extra numbers in defence. Buckley had 31 disposals, the same as his opponent Kane Johnson. Buckley pumped the ball into his forward-50 just four times. Johnson did it nine. The simple reason was because Buckley spent 90 per cent of his time in the back half. And Collingwood will win very few games when that happens.

It was disappointing there was no new blood in Collingwood's opening game. Richmond had three on debut. And it was disappointing to see Tristen Walker given just nine minutes of game time.

Much to the horror of some Magpie fans, I have suggested that Collingwood could slip out of the eight this season. Improvement has to come from outside the top six. I doubt if you will see that from the experienced James Clement, Simon Prestigiacomo, Shane Wakelin, Shane Woewodin, Shane O'Bree and McKee. In fact, O'Bree and McKee look as if they could be going backwards.

Big question marks hover over the younger brigade. Collectively they appear to be frontrunners. When the team is up and they have freedom, they look OK. But when the heat is on and you have to stand your ground and win a contest, they go missing.

Last Friday night, Jason Cloke at centre half-back zoned off Shane Morrison to enable the young Tiger to take five early uncontested marks. Rhyce Shaw, on a wing, played loose on Nathan Brown. The end result? Brown gets off to a flyer with eight first-quarter kicks.

Leon Davis allows himself to to be brushed aside when things get physical and Matthew Lokan indiscriminately lets rip with runs and wayward disposal no matter what the stage of the game.

Alan Didak has a few tricks but has to kick the crunch goals, and Richard Cole, if settled at half-back, should develop into a good player.

So Magpie fans, don't assume that another grand final appearance is on the cards. In fact, if a couple of the super six, for whatever reason, happen to subside, there may be no September action at all.
 
GG - Wall's always talks pompous fatuous crap

Wall's talks crap when he implies we did well over the last two years because of half a dozen players.

We did well in home and away and crunch games because MM could mould average players into a system that didn't rely on champions.

Our mid field put superb defensive pressure on all comers so it didn't matter that we didn't have a gun ruck man. Our defensive pressure meant that we still had as many if not more take aways than the opposition.

That mid field defensive pressure (without a list of champions) put our defense of no names to put superb pressure on all forward lines because the opposition was strangled of clean crisp delivery to there forwards.

Our back system was strong, cohesive, organised, thinking and hard at the ball.

Where was that in the grand final and against richmond?

At the moment, I think softness and no mid field defensive pressure are our achilles heel too many players NOT hard at the ball.

And the complete lack of mid field defensive pressure that we saw in the GF reared its ugly head again last friday night.
Wake's and Presti worked hard and did there best but until the mid field become accountable for their direct opponent and put some defensive pressure on the oppositions mid field, we aren't going to be competitive.

Forwards win you games BUT YOUR DEFENCE MAKES YOU COMPETITIVE.

Also too many backmen fixated on the flashy run through the lines then not pushing back twice as hard to cover the their opponent who was loose.

As for back men kicking to the oppositions advantage, hand passing to the oppositions advantage, missing tackles and making the wrong decisions, that is not the foundation upon which to build a competitve season.

As I've said on another thread I just expected them to have that acid fire of disappointment burning furiously in their guts..and for the unequenchable desire to atone and succeed to drive them into coming out like a bunch of desperate and crazed maniacs chasing the ball like 18 rotweillers after a bone.

MM needs to get play to that 'teams man ship ' he talked about in 2002 that got us through difficult times without big name players.

Champion, cohesive team with commitment and always pressing.

Still, I would like to see Holland, Johnson, Rhyce Shaw, Cole, Jason Cloke, Leon Davis, Shane O'bree ( who is soft) to go up a level now.......Or else become an average cog in a cohesive system....aka 2002 and 2003 home and away rounds.....
 
WHY READ THE AGE


WITH RBERT WALLS AND CAROLINE WILSON


THE AGE IS ONLY GOOD FOR STARTING MY FIREPLACE WITH


THEY WILL EAT THERE WORDS
 
Walls is spot on..

Collingwood are far from a top-class team.
To get beaten as they did last Friday against that rabble Richmond is totally unacceptable for a side that believes it's a top AFL team
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Robert Walls is nothing more than a re-iterator....a smart arse after the fact.

If u had won, he would be kissing ya arse!

You only need to listen (if u can handle it) to is 2nd rate TV commentry.

He sees every move coming - dont u know.
Anything a coach does that a brialliant move, he would have done to.

No wonder he couldnt get the brisbane bears going, let along fitzroy.

Collingwood r a little better than what they played on friday night so I wouldnt worry about this idiot or Caroline Wilson.
 
Originally posted by surpstar
Walls is spot on..

Collingwood are far from a top-class team.
To get beaten as they did last Friday against that rabble Richmond is totally unacceptable for a side that believes it's a top AFL team

i wouldnt classify richmond as a rabble when there best players fire, like last friday night
no rabble would have Ottens, Richo, Kane johnson, coughlan, nathan brown (when they were at their best) in their best players for a game
collingwood were just beaten by the best side on the night, we will see if richmond can sustain that for the next 21 weeks
 
Did you call them a top class team in 2002 you goose....

Originally posted by surpstar
Walls is spot on..

Collingwood are far from a top-class team.
To get beaten as they did last Friday against that rabble Richmond is totally unacceptable for a side that believes it's a top AFL team

Did we not play in a final against Port without bucks and our senior players down in form?

In that final the backs as a unit performed well,
the mid field as a unit performed well and the forwards scrubbed enough goals.

That was against the benchmark team that finished minor premiers in terms of home and away wins.
Before that Port game our form had been crap.

Each group within the team played as a group over the opposition. It wasn't one or two talented individuals that orchestrated that win.

Ordinary or average players can meld into a champion team.
A reliance on just 6 means we are not focusing on the 3 groups (that make up a team) as a unit playing above average football.

If MM can't reignite the 3 groups as competitive, cohesive groups then we can write off the season, but two seasons where MM's "group performance (rather than an individual) is the key" has been successfull. WE can see the flaws in individuals, that is obvious, but to date it is how they have performed in the group that has characterised whether they can EXECUTE MM's tactics or not.
 
Originally posted by GlovemanGayfer
Nick Steven's (or similar) was neccesary for us this year, .


Port wanted Presti or Didak PLUS a draft pick for Stevens. Didak was lively, he was one error off a three goal game (you would take that every week from a small forward) and without Presti we would have lost by 20 goals.
 
Pies made 2 GF in a row because of 2 things:

Rigid game plan, which the team stuck to
Lack of injuries

It still amazes me how many teams in the comp don't adhere to a strict game plan week in week out (my team included). Malthouse has done a superb job getting the team to play a style of football that wins big games: tough, umcompromising, counter-attacking. Walls does make a point that the best 6 missed a combined total of only a few games, which is freakish luck with injuries.
 
Walls is the only (so called) expert who I have ever heard actually agree with an opinion of Mike Sheahan.

That tells me exactly all I need to know about him
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom