Remove this Banner Ad

Round 9 NAB rising star nomination?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigburger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

Who will win the nomination for the NAB rising star in Round 9?

  • Chris Masten

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Garrick Ibbotson

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tom Hawkins

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Cale Morton

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Nathan Brown

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

bigburger

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Mar 7, 2008
Posts
8,336
Reaction score
28
Location
Imagineland
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
Everton, WDCC, Force
Who will it be?

Obviously I am gonna say Masten lol. Well I hope so. He was terrific against North and would have been very close to Tippett.
 
dunno why tom hawkins is in the list. if it was a cat player it would be ryan gamble. Hawkins couldnt get near it sat.
I voted for morton 3 goals is a good effort
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Eh? I was expecting to find a Masten troll piece by your fine self but nothing noticeable. What's the deal?

I think he thinks that the passed round was Round 9. Tool

Jeeze Pav for AA. Your letting yourself down of late. Atleast have some very questionable facts to back your argument. Your choking just like your team.
 
Agreed. I voted Ibbotson, can't believe i forgot about Cotchin! But then I didn't really bother to think of any alternatives to the 5 listed...
 
dunno why tom hawkins is in the list. if it was a cat player it would be ryan gamble. Hawkins couldnt get near it sat.
I voted for morton 3 goals is a good effort

Geez mate some of the stuff u post on here is quality then u post this sort of crap.

It was pissing down with rain on sat, hardly ideal conditions for a KPP, even Richo struggled when he went forward - 1 goal.

Gamble can not win/be nominated for the rising star award because he was suspended a few weeks back.

Hawkins on a still night at the MCG could do some damage.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Brad Ebert surely has to get it now. He has come storming into calculations with a 135 dreamteam points performance.

If someone told me he'd get it before Masten after last round i would have laughed now I firmly believe he will. Dominant performance from the youngster.
 
Nathan Brown played well on Friday night and is way overdue for a nomination. He's got more good games against good opponents under his belt than many of the players being touted in this thread IMO.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I see. From the TV to your keyboard via your sphincter.

That explains a fair bit.

Still means I extracted it from the TV though doesn't it. So that ruins your first argument that I did not watch the game..

oops? I think so. Now run along little one.
 
Still means I extracted it from the TV though doesn't it. So that ruins your first argument that I did not watch the game..

oops? I think so. Now run along little one.

If by 'argument' you mean asking a question, I guess so. Personally I thought the question was warranted, because you clearly have no idea at all. Not for the first time, I might add.

PS: quit while you're behind, dropkick.
 
If by 'argument' you mean asking a question, I guess so. Personally I thought the question was warranted, because you clearly have no idea at all. Not for the first time, I might add.

PS: quit while you're behind, dropkick.


I had my opinion, and you being a Collingwood supporter immediately attacked like the uncooth fan you are. So, while you assume I am behind, I am well infront. You're willingness to immediately attack instead of asking a question of why I thought he didnt play that well shows that you are nothing more than a fool who has limited mental capacity when it comes to accepting critcism. Au revoir.
 
I had my opinion, and you being a Collingwood supporter immediately attacked like the uncooth fan you are. So, while you assume I am behind, I am well infront. You're willingness to immediately attack instead of asking a question of why I thought he didnt play that well shows that you are nothing more than a fool who has limited mental capacity when it comes to accepting critcism. Au revoir.

Sure. And my opinion is that your opinion is moronic. Evidence? You saying Brown was 'crap' when anyone with even a scintilla of common sense would know that he wasn't. If you'd offered a reasonable opinion, you'd have got a reasonable response.

Instead you offered a steaming pile of shit, and I treated it as such. Too late to get on your high horse now.

Ah, justice.

PS: I may be 'uncouth', but at least I can spell it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom