Round 9 NAB rising star nomination?

[bigburger]

Who will it be?

Obviously I am gonna say Masten lol. Well I hope so. He was terrific against North and would have been very close to Tippett.

 

[Pav for AA]

Who will it be?

Obviously I am gonna say Masten lol. Well I hope so. He was terrific against North and would have been very close to Tippett.

You idiot. See mainboard.

 

[wce_all_da_way]

You idiot. See mainboard.

Eh? I was expecting to find a Masten troll piece by your fine self but nothing noticeable. What's the deal?

 

[kinggaz29]

dunno why tom hawkins is in the list. if it was a cat player it would be ryan gamble. Hawkins couldnt get near it sat.
I voted for morton 3 goals is a good effort

 

[bigburger]

Eh? I was expecting to find a Masten troll piece by your fine self but nothing noticeable. What's the deal?

I think he thinks that the passed round was Round 9. Tool

Jeeze Pav for AA. Your letting yourself down of late. Atleast have some very questionable facts to back your argument. Your choking just like your team.

 

[SuperDude]

Nathan Brown Easily

 

[Richo is God]

trent cotchin

 

[ToroHombre]

Agreed. I voted Ibbotson, can't believe i forgot about Cotchin! But then I didn't really bother to think of any alternatives to the 5 listed...

 

[cat_fanatic]

dunno why tom hawkins is in the list. if it was a cat player it would be ryan gamble. Hawkins couldnt get near it sat.
I voted for morton 3 goals is a good effort

Geez mate some of the stuff u post on here is quality then u post this sort of crap.

It was pissing down with rain on sat, hardly ideal conditions for a KPP, even Richo struggled when he went forward - 1 goal.

Gamble can not win/be nominated for the rising star award because he was suspended a few weeks back.

Hawkins on a still night at the MCG could do some damage.

 

[Top4_Tiger]

Trent Cotchin vs Essendon.... cos it is easy to look good in a 10 goal win.

 

[croady_fan24]

Cyril? lol.

 

[I love DELEDIO]

TRENT COTCHIN all the way !!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Silvagnis]

Browne, Hampson, Kreuzer or Grigg if they play well and we win.

 

[Hollow Knight]

Meant to vote "Other" but accidently voted Nathan Brown.

 

[bigburger]

Brad Ebert surely has to get it now. He has come storming into calculations with a 135 dreamteam points performance.

If someone told me he'd get it before Masten after last round i would have laughed now I firmly believe he will. Dominant performance from the youngster.

 

[Palmer Stoat]

Nathan Brown played well on Friday night and is way overdue for a nomination. He's got more good games against good opponents under his belt than many of the players being touted in this thread IMO.

 

[Bradesmaen]

Meh, was crap, bring on the Ebert!

 

[Palmer Stoat]

Meh, was crap, bring on the Ebert!

He wasn't 'crap'. Did you even watch the match, or are you -- as is your custom -- extracting your opinions from your sphincter?

 

[Bradesmaen]

He wasn't 'crap'. Did you even watch the match, or are you -- as is your custom -- extracting your opinions from your sphincter?

Extracting them from the TV.

 

[Palmer Stoat]

Extracting them from the TV.

I see. From the TV to your keyboard via your sphincter.

That explains a fair bit.

 

[Bradesmaen]

I see. From the TV to your keyboard via your sphincter.

That explains a fair bit.

Still means I extracted it from the TV though doesn't it. So that ruins your first argument that I did not watch the game..

oops? I think so. Now run along little one.

 

[Palmer Stoat]

Still means I extracted it from the TV though doesn't it. So that ruins your first argument that I did not watch the game..

oops? I think so. Now run along little one.

If by 'argument' you mean asking a question, I guess so. Personally I thought the question was warranted, because you clearly have no idea at all. Not for the first time, I might add.

PS: quit while you're behind, dropkick.

 

[parrot]

Grigg.

 

[Bradesmaen]

If by 'argument' you mean asking a question, I guess so. Personally I thought the question was warranted, because you clearly have no idea at all. Not for the first time, I might add.

PS: quit while you're behind, dropkick.

I had my opinion, and you being a Collingwood supporter immediately attacked like the uncooth fan you are. So, while you assume I am behind, I am well infront. You're willingness to immediately attack instead of asking a question of why I thought he didnt play that well shows that you are nothing more than a fool who has limited mental capacity when it comes to accepting critcism. Au revoir.

 

[Palmer Stoat]

I had my opinion, and you being a Collingwood supporter immediately attacked like the uncooth fan you are. So, while you assume I am behind, I am well infront. You're willingness to immediately attack instead of asking a question of why I thought he didnt play that well shows that you are nothing more than a fool who has limited mental capacity when it comes to accepting critcism. Au revoir.

Sure. And my opinion is that your opinion is moronic. Evidence? You saying Brown was 'crap' when anyone with even a scintilla of common sense would know that he wasn't. If you'd offered a reasonable opinion, you'd have got a reasonable response.

Instead you offered a steaming pile of shit, and I treated it as such. Too late to get on your high horse now.

Ah, justice.

PS: I may be 'uncouth', but at least I can spell it.