saints hav a great eye for talent

[loui]

i hav had it with commentators and supporters that continue to harp on about st kilda's talented youth i agree they hav a good future but F__ what do u expect when u finish last every year
and get the first and second picks always. Very easy to recruit well

congratulations to st kilda for having a great eye in recruiting
showing the other 15 afl clubs how easy it is to recruit

 

[SpInNeR]

Mate if you want to look for high dratt picks over the years - then go to Freo

St.kilda has only had one #1 pick in the last five years. Last years was #3 yet it was not our fualt that Carlton (the wooden spooners) overpaid their players ie. cheated

We simply did not trade our picks and if all clubs had such good recruiters such as ours they would have selected Lenny Hayes #11 and Dal Santo #13 before us!

 

[Nandoz]

Mate, they do have a great eye for talent. Just because you get a high draft pick, it doesnt mean a great young player comes to you on a platter. It takes alot of time, preparation and background checking to pick the right players, and the recruiting staff at St. Kilda have done a great job. I think they will be right up there within the next few years.

 

[loui]

spinr

st kilda's picks

2000 draft 1 and 2

2001 2 and 5

2002 1

 

[loui]

nandoz

what planet are you on you dont need a good eye when finish last every club knows who the best talent are

 

[Nandoz]

Re: nandoz

Originally posted by loui
what planet are you on you dont need a good eye when finish last every club knows who the best talent are

and how many draft picks go wrong. not all the best players just come to yopu first up, and you need to do your research no matter what. hird @ pick 75? i think so. i dont know if your a complete fool or not, but things dont come easy, ********.

 

[SpInNeR]

what planet are you on you dont need a good eye when finish last every club knows who the best talent are

Well done Moron


John Hutton, Drew Banfeild, Clive Waterhouse, Travis Johnstone, Des Headland and Josh Fraser have been great for being the number one pick. (all took about 4 yrs to become quality players)

Its just coincidence that St.kilda gets to pick the very best players at number one like Riewoldt and Goddard.

 

[Fall Out Boy]

Re: Re: nandoz

Originally posted by Nandoz
hird @ pick 75?

Hardly comparable to todays draft.

Back then clubs recruiting strategies were amateur, at best.

The top 5 pick themselves these days. A top 5 pick is like shooting fish in a barrel.

 

[loui]

nandoz

d______ you hav a football brain of a pea

 

[loui]

jade

exactly jade

 

[SpInNeR]

Yes Loui, yet another good reply and once again u base ur thoughts on nothing.

Ur contribution is appriciated because it is better to be thought a fool then to open ur mouth and remove all doubt...to late for u though!!!!

HAHAHHAA

 

[loui]

spinner

exactly what your name is

 

[Nandoz]

19 posts. Not one valuable to any one readin at all.

please save yourself from the embarassment, stop making crap up without a valid point and waiting for others to support you, then quote them and say... "exactly".

you are the widdlestick here, and id appreciate it if you shut the **** up in the future....****.

 

[Altum Volantes]

Originally posted by SpInNeR
Well done Moron


John Hutton, Drew Banfeild, Clive Waterhouse, Travis Johnstone, Des Headland and Josh Fraser have been great for being the number one pick. (all took about 4 yrs to become quality players)

Get a clue.

Drew Banfield debut in 1993, slotted pretty much flawlessly into our premiership winning midfield of 1994 (we hardly missed Dwayne Lamb, the man he replaced, and that's saying something), and in 1996, his 4th year on the list, won the club's B&F - he's since gone on to play 200+ games and be a consistant performer for many years.

Get your facts right.

Your argument that St Kilda have had no real advantage of having high picks and their potential success with the young group they have is simply based on smart drafting is a weak one.
You can't compare it to the draft of old, things have changed too much since then. Pretty much, it's only really the last 3-4 drafts that have been accurate.
Having high draft picks is a MAJOR advantage, and nobody said that the likes of Fremantle haven't benefited from it aswell, but to say St Kilda hasn't is just plain stupid.

 

[loui]

nandoz

ghureghierogjnredzjneapozir

 

[Nandoz]

Originally posted by Black JuJu
Get a clue.

Drew Banfield debut in 1993, slotted pretty much flawlessly into our premiership winning midfield of 1994 (we hardly missed Dwayne Lamb, the man he replaced, and that's saying something), and in 1996, his 4th year on the list, won the club's B&F.

Get your facts right.

Your argument that St Kilda have had no real advantage of having high picks and their potential success with the young group they have is simply based on smart drafting is a weak one.
You can't compare it to the draft of old, things have changed too much since then. Pretty much, it's only really the last 3-4 drafts that have been accurate.
Having high draft picks is a MAJOR advantage, and nobody said that the likes of Fremantle haven't benefited from it aswell, but to say St Kilda hasn't is just plain stupid.

im not saying you dont advantage from high fraft picks, of course you do, what were saying is that a 1st round draft pick doesnt always benefit the playing team. it still takes some scouting, time, preparation to know and make the right decisions, and this ******** louis obviously doesnt have the slightest clue of how the system works.

 

[loui]

nandoz

mjkfdhgkjjglkasgj

 

[Nandoz]

Re: nandoz

Originally posted by loui
mjkfdhgkjjglkasgj

Another educated comment. Keep em' coming.

 

[The Fireman]

Re: nandoz

Originally posted by loui
mjkfdhgkjjglkasgj

where is the moron filter?
This bloke is a wierdo.

 

[SpInNeR]

Black JUJU

St.kilda has only had one #1 pick in the last five years. Last years was #3 yet it was not our fualt that Carlton (the wooden spooners) overpaid their players ie. cheatedWe simply did not trade our picks and if all clubs had such good recruiters such as ours they would have selected Lenny Hayes #11 and Dal Santo #13 before us!

It is annoying to hear idiots say, urve had so many draft picks when research shows that Freo has had twice as many as with Collingwood over the last few years. They traded theirs and we simply stuck with ours.

examples

Collingwood - 1998 #3 (to Sydney), 1999 #1 (fraser) #3 (to richmond, 2000 #3 (didak)

Fremantle - 1998 #2 (longmuir), 1999 # 2, #4 #5 (for Hasleby, Pavlich and Brown), 2000 #6, 2001, #1 (for croad), #4 (polak)

St.kilda - 1998 #11 (hayes), 1999 #9 (beetham), 2000 #1 #2 (riewoldt and Kossie), 2001 #2 #5 (balland Clark), 2002, #3


as you can see that 1998 nd 1999 are not high picks at all - St.kilda just seems to have alot of concessions because we stuck with our draft picks

Exactly where did i say that St.kilda has not benefitted. You are simply making stuff up. My argument is it is naive to simply say that St.kilda gets all the high draft picks.

but F__ what do u expect when u finish last every year

This was the Agument JUJU, so stick so F___ u right in the ear!!

 

[loui]

nandoz

nandoz you dont hav a f____ clue about footy

pick number 1 and 84 its all the same d_____

 

[Nandoz]

Re: nandoz

Originally posted by loui
nandoz you dont hav a f____ clue about footy

pick number 1 and 84 its all the same d_____

ok mate...okay.

youve paraded your stupidity enough, so please quieten down before more and more see your moronic ways.

I know much much more about footy than you, ********, so stop ****ing with me idiot.

 

[The Fireman]

Re: nandoz

Originally posted by loui
nandoz you dont hav a f____ clue about footy

pick number 1 and 84 its all the same d_____

Ioui why are you here? idiot.
you are wasting your time here mate, go and annoy someone else. You talk absolute garbage.

 

[loui]

nandoz

u do i recall how good a player u were in the auskick

 

[Nandoz]

Re: nandoz

Originally posted by loui
u do i recall how good a player u were in the auskick

okaay.....