Schools told not to use the 34

[Spongebob]

schools in Victoria have been warned against using any of the 34 for coaching or mentoring roles.

Potential breaches of WADA Code for schools and players

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/essend...ot-to-use-banned-players-20160216-gmvs16.html

 

[Slartibartfast]

They take it seriously, Ahmet could not help with the under nines!

 

[expires]

All could help with multiplication. Schools are slipping.

 

[jenny61_99]

Good to see someone taking it seriously.

 

[Sir Hugh Percy]

Shameful. These guys have so much to offer about keeping your mouth shut and just doing what you're told.

 

[DapperDon]

Good to see someone taking it seriously.

Who's not taking it seriously?

 

[branedotorg]

Who's not taking it seriously?

the afl, c7, kia ...

 

[DapperDon]

the afl, c7, kia ...

What are they doing that breaks the WADA code?

 

[Garlic muncher]

the afl, c7, kia ...

Kia is not taking the WADA code seriously - OMFG, shame on them

 

[imperial_oz]

Kia is not taking the WADA code seriously - OMFG, shame on them

Of course Kia wouldn't take the WADA code seriously, they are always advertising their cars are performance enhanced!

 

[Spongebob]

i thought it was the Fiat 500 that was "enhanced"

 

[imperial_oz]

i thought it was the Fiat 500 that was "enhanced"

Hahaha...still a Fiat!

 

[jenny61_99]

Hahaha...still a Fiat!

Fiat... always reminded me of pfffft.

 

[Muggs]

Shameful. These guys have so much to offer about keeping your mouth shut and just doing what you're told.

Lol, they still can do that, just need the group being addressed being broader than just sporting teams...

 

[BF Tiger]

Does it stop Mark McVeigh from attempting Year 9 for the third time?

 

[Nikita Blue]

Legal Studies?

 

[Milanista28]

Good to see someone taking it seriously.

Are you super serial right now?

 

[Hoops]

What if it was an amateur sport, and you taught sport at a school?
Forget about the so called 'new world order' WADA rules them all.
How did we let it get to this? mandatory sentencing, watering down the burden of proof to 'comfortably satisfied'. Perhaps we should bring back the death penalty to let offenders know that they need to be more aware of what they put in their bodies. After watching Four Corners Monday night we are partly there.

 

[Garlic muncher]

What if it was an amateur sport, and you taught sport at a school?
Forget about the so called 'new world order' WADA rules them all.
How did we let it get to this? mandatory sentencing, watering down the burden of proof to 'comfortably satisfied'. Perhaps we should bring back the death penalty to let offenders know that they need to be more aware of what they put in their bodies. After watching Four Corners Monday night we are partly there.

Mass hysteria usually, combined with a lot of very nasty people, quite a few of them post here.

 

[JimDocker]

A worldwide ban is a ban.

Generally, AFL players going to schools are going in official capacities and are looked up to as role models by the kids. Some people say they are not, but why do they go to schools and junior footy clubs if they are not held up as such. A drug cheat should not be able to take up a position helping any sporting side until the ban is over.

It seems pretty black and white to me. It needs to be.

 

[Laphroaig]

What if it was an amateur sport,

Another one who thinks the anti doping Code only applies to professionals.

and you taught sport at a school?

A reasonable person might take the view that a convicted cheat isn't fit to teach sport at school.

 

[ManWithNoName]

I demand a nation-wide boycott of Kia until they release a statement clarifying their deep respect of the WADA Code. It's out of control.

 

[Garlic muncher]

Another one who thinks the anti doping Code only applies to professionals.



A reasonable person might take the view that a convicted cheat isn't fit to teach sport at school.

Right on cue

 

[Chameleon75]

What if it was an amateur sport, and you taught sport at a school?
Forget about the so called 'new world order' WADA rules them all.
How did we let it get to this? mandatory sentencing, watering down the burden of proof to 'comfortably satisfied'. Perhaps we should bring back the death penalty to let offenders know that they need to be more aware of what they put in their bodies. After watching Four Corners Monday night we are partly there.

what standard do you think a court would apply?

 

[imperial_oz]

What if it was an amateur sport, and you taught sport at a school?
Forget about the so called 'new world order' WADA rules them all.
How did we let it get to this? mandatory sentencing, watering down the burden of proof to 'comfortably satisfied'. Perhaps we should bring back the death penalty to let offenders know that they need to be more aware of what they put in their bodies. After watching Four Corners Monday night we are partly there.

The burden of proof for civil cases is 'balance of probabilities'. For anti-doping cases it has actually been raised to 'comfortable satisfaction' not watered down. You could probably make more of a case if you actually had some understanding of what you were complaining about. As it stands, its easy to dismiss your comments because most people here know that they are completely wrong.

As for mandatory sentencing, that is also incorrect. Sanctions can be increased or reduced depending on the individual circumstances pertaining to individual situations. So thats something else you haven't got correct.

Anti-doping rules also apply to amateur sport.

All of this has been dealt with many, many times over the last few years. It quite amazing that incorrect material like this can still be posted when most people's level of understanding is well past this point. Really, you need to do better.