Remove this Banner Ad

Shane Tuck

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

just maybe

Brownlow Medallist
10k Posts
Joined
Mar 28, 2005
Posts
15,983
Reaction score
8
Other Teams
Adelaide
Richmond need to lose a player for money reasons, we need to go hard for this guy.

He is EXACTLY what we need. He is excellent at clearances, a quality in-and-under player.
 
I doubt we'd get him, but he did play for Westies
 
just maybe said:
Richmond need to lose a player for money reasons, we need to go hard for this guy.

He is EXACTLY what we need. He is excellent at clearances, a quality in-and-under player.
ahahah No we dont fool :rolleyes:

We havea clutter of in and under players and we MIGHT get rid of one to havea chance to get Polak.


Tuck is going NOWHERE.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Lenny* said:
ahahah No we dont fool :rolleyes:

We havea clutter of in and under players and we MIGHT get rid of one to havea chance to get Polak.


Tuck is going NOWHERE.

Fool? Shut your mouth you dung-throwing dunce.

You think you know a lot about your club eh? Obviously not. I'm loath to believe everything the footy scribes write, but I believe them more than some dullard fan who thinks he knows everything.

The Dockers are considering the possibility of Richmond's Shane Tuck joining them as a part of a trade for the uncontracted Graham Polak. Tuck was one of a number of names raised by the Tigers, who say they need to lose a player — for money reasons — to get Polak. West Australian Mark Coughlan, however, was not one of the options.

http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/realfooty/articles/2006/10/10/1160246131564.html
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom