A Cut Above
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 in my lifetime 😁
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2015
- Posts
- 28,068
- Reaction score
- 87,266
- Location
- 🅱️🅰️🥇1️⃣3️⃣
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams

Howdy DHs, Boskndy here with another controversial topic destined to provoke an inevitable mod deletefest rampage.
Jeff Kennett is a buffoon. As further roof of this incontrovertible fact he's jumping on the change Australia Day bandwagon for reasons unexplained, maybe because its horrifyingly been more than 5 minutes since his name appeared in print: The Age article
Of course this would get brought up again right before Australia Day, just as it has been in recent years thanks to the increasing shrill voice of the lunatic left-wing fringe and the depressing seriousness with which we're expected to take them. What primarily shits me about all this is that changing the date of Australia Day does nothing to improve or remove those elements of Australian history the present generation finds objectionable, does nothing to change the present circumstances of the descendants of those adversely affected by them, and is a woefully poor substitute for any genuine attempt to compensate them through material means, something which to an extent has already happened.
Changing Australia Day reeks of a cynical and crass attempt to throw the Aboriginal population an appeasement bone, with the goal of buying ourselves as much white guilt alleviation for the smallest possible amount of effort. A transparently token gesture which disassocaties the nation's day from its founding and colonization, divorces us from the past 73 years of celebrating it on the 26th, and further prompts the question "how on earth are we to determine one day of the year on which horrible things weren't done to Aboriginals by our colonial forebears?". Not only would we be breaking a national tradition to appease 2% of our population for events that (mostly) part took place over 200 years ago, but we'd have no guarantee that 2% might not at some future time find something else objectionable about the new date we choose. In a sense we'd be allowing Australia Day to be held hostage.
Lefty feminist nutjobs may disagree, but its perfectly possible to feel every sort of sympathy for the plight of Aboriginals and indignation towards the horrific manner in which they were treated... AND also prefer Australia Day remains on the 26th. These views are not mutually exclusive, only minds as small as their own are incapable of holding both simultaneously.
That's my view and I'm not above changing it if you can conclusively demonstrate why I'm wrong. In the meantime I'll wander off pondering the uncomfortable strangeness of how it feels at such times to wish Bruce Ruxton were still alive.
Jeff Kennett is a buffoon. As further roof of this incontrovertible fact he's jumping on the change Australia Day bandwagon for reasons unexplained, maybe because its horrifyingly been more than 5 minutes since his name appeared in print: The Age article
Of course this would get brought up again right before Australia Day, just as it has been in recent years thanks to the increasing shrill voice of the lunatic left-wing fringe and the depressing seriousness with which we're expected to take them. What primarily shits me about all this is that changing the date of Australia Day does nothing to improve or remove those elements of Australian history the present generation finds objectionable, does nothing to change the present circumstances of the descendants of those adversely affected by them, and is a woefully poor substitute for any genuine attempt to compensate them through material means, something which to an extent has already happened.
Changing Australia Day reeks of a cynical and crass attempt to throw the Aboriginal population an appeasement bone, with the goal of buying ourselves as much white guilt alleviation for the smallest possible amount of effort. A transparently token gesture which disassocaties the nation's day from its founding and colonization, divorces us from the past 73 years of celebrating it on the 26th, and further prompts the question "how on earth are we to determine one day of the year on which horrible things weren't done to Aboriginals by our colonial forebears?". Not only would we be breaking a national tradition to appease 2% of our population for events that (mostly) part took place over 200 years ago, but we'd have no guarantee that 2% might not at some future time find something else objectionable about the new date we choose. In a sense we'd be allowing Australia Day to be held hostage.
Lefty feminist nutjobs may disagree, but its perfectly possible to feel every sort of sympathy for the plight of Aboriginals and indignation towards the horrific manner in which they were treated... AND also prefer Australia Day remains on the 26th. These views are not mutually exclusive, only minds as small as their own are incapable of holding both simultaneously.
That's my view and I'm not above changing it if you can conclusively demonstrate why I'm wrong. In the meantime I'll wander off pondering the uncomfortable strangeness of how it feels at such times to wish Bruce Ruxton were still alive.










