Opinion Sinclair or Lycett

[Happy Mastenator]

Can basically put this to bed now I reckon. Against one of the most dominant ruckmen in the game Lycett was non-existent. Sinkers on the other hand stood up pretty well.

Both got monstered. Sinclair is obviously ahead at the monent but think Lycett might take another step forward after another preseason

 

[Gizza]

Both got monstered. Sinclair is obviously ahead at the monent but think Lycett might take another step forward after another preseason

1 goal and 4 marks between their ruckmen and 2 goals and 5 marks between ours. Sure Sandilands dominated the hitouts, but their rucks impact on the game was pretty well non-existent I thought.

 

[SpaceClef]

Considering they're both fighting out for the same spot it's only logical to compare the two. It's not like Sinclair is old. He can easily play alongside Naitanui as number two for basically each other's entire careers, they're about the same age. Lycett needs to prove himself better, and do it pretty soon otherwise he might just find himself as trade bait. We don't really gain much out of having a bloke 3 years younger.

Well we do, it's called depth.

Our ruck depth, and the Sinclair v Lycett debate, is the ABSOLUTE LEAST of our worries. We can (and will) keep both of them regardless of their form this year.

 

[ROYAL EAGLE]

1 goal and 4 marks between their ruckmen and 2 goals and 5 marks between ours. Sure Sandilands dominated the hitouts, but their rucks impact on the game was pretty well non-existent I thought.

You did realise Lycett strained his PCL and played out the whole game.
Incredible effort by him.

Sorry Gizza relpyed to wrong post.

 

[boondy]

Lovin sinkers , as always

 

[jaxxon]

Lycett started off really well, didn't even realise he was injured.