- Joined
- May 7, 2011
- Posts
- 67,740
- Reaction score
- 16,180
- Location
- Wangaratta
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Celtics, Tottenham, Oakland Raiders
No more sub!!!
![]()
Are you sure it's the sub rule change that she's celebrating?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
No more sub!!!
![]()
I see the intent there, but you'd be looking at many delays and 'counts' and stuff that would detract from the enjoyment of the game too.Very glad the Sub rule has gone. Don't like the cap on interchange either.
If they are really that concerned re crowds around the ball, I'd prefer the go for "nuclear" options like starting zones for stoppages rather than these stupid tinkerings. Everytime there is a stoppage, each team must have 3 players in each 50 meter arc, and no more than 10 in one arc. After that let play flow freely as it wants and players run as far and whenever they want in play, but resetting everytime there's a stoppage.
Would significantly reduce congestion, not interfere overtly during play and protect teams from outsmarting themselves and winning the ball only for there to be no forwards to kick it to.
Hmmm, I'm sensing a theme here...It was brought in to stop Swan, and now that Swan is getting to the age where hed make an awesome supersub....its abolished.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I might be biased but when we were dominant along with Geelong before all this came about the footy was the best I've ever seen, I loved the speed, bring it back, I don't think there were that many more injuries. Good riddance sub rule!
Funnily enough, we've done well on stacking our midfield with high endurance guys. Freeman, Greenwood, Crisp all noted for their ability to run all day and strength at the contest.
but we were dominant in 2011 when the sub rule was in.
In my recollection, apart from the last match, it was my favourite season. The way we switched on at any point during the match (usually 3rd qrtr) and blew away opponents was exhilarating.
Sub rule mistake on Grand Final day was a contributor to our loss. If versatile Goldsack was available to come on for an injured Reid rather than a first year forward pocket Fasolo, we may have won that game. Dont know why Mick had it in for Goldy....hes the only player on our list with a 100% winning record in Grand Finals!!!
All he had to do was put Taz onto Hawkins.
Otherwise we seemed to handle the sub rule as well as anyone that year.
Hope they have a good look at the short kick rule too. Sick of hearing 'not fifteen'. Some are, most aren't.
Maybe increase to 20 then it will be 15?![]()