Media Sweet FA Sum of Ranks

[TRUMAN#1]

TRUMAN#1 your thoughts

Midget midfielders once again trying to justify their existence.

A lot of Small man syndrome from them in here.

 

[grumbleguts]

On Hate's Sweet FA+, each player profile indicates where that player is ranked - in the history of the league - for a large range of statistics. Here is my page, for example (see the "League Rank" column):

View attachment 2294472

What I'd like to know is who has the best 'Sum of Ranks'. That is, the smallest cumulative number ranking across desired statistics like hitouts, kicks, marks, handballs, tackles, goals, and DT points. Let's take a look at some league favourites:

Tarkyn_24

• Hitouts: 65th
• Kicks: 3rd
• Marks: 45th
• Handballs: 35th
• Tackles: 6th
• Goals: 1st
• DT: 3rd
• Total: 158

TheInjuryFactory

• Hitouts: 454th
• Kicks: 92nd
• Marks: 303rd
• Handballs: 82nd
• Tackles: 16th
• Goals: 210th
• DT: 88th
• Total: 1,245

Mobbs

• Hitouts: 127th
• Kicks: 12th
• Marks: 2nd
• Handballs: 10th
• Tackles: 74th
• Goals: 90th
• DT: 15th
• Total: 330

serial_thrilla

• Hitouts: 300th
• Kicks: 216th
• Marks: 156th
• Handballs: 188th
• Tackles: 278th
• Goals: 525th
• DT: 221st
• Total: 1,884

So, so far, the order would be:

1. Tarkyn_24 (158)
2. Mobbs (330)
3. TheInjuryFactory (1,245)
4. serial_thrilla (1,884)

How about you, Sweet? Who can you think of who might top the sum of ranks? And how does your own career look?

Unless these are ranked in terms of stat per game they don't mean all that much.

 

[Headless]

Unless these are ranked in terms of stat per game they don't mean all that much.

I can't believe you'd say such a thing.

 

[DenieD]

Disregard hitouts. Nobody cares about them.

I still haven't got a single hit out. I am very proud of that stat.

YOU CANT MAKE ME RUCK!

 

[grumbleguts]

I can't believe you'd say such a thing.

 

[damicky]

It's also biased towards those who hoard the best on-field positions.

You should instead be recognising those who selflessly toil away in the non-glory roles.

 

[Yakker]

Yakker

Immensely proud of my ability to accomplish absolutely nothing in this field

 

[Yakker]

View attachment 2294543
Robertio

Player Information

HitOuts	0	0.00	1191st

How many games is the question sir

 

[Robertio]

How many games is the question sir

View attachment 2294917

170 mate you win.

 

[Yakker]

170 mate you win.

Every game I am literally nervous that bastard sim will drag me from some position and swap me into the ruck. I want to be renowned throughout the league as an underachiever just like BEEG

 

[TRUMAN#1]

Every game I am literally nervous that bastard sim will drag me from some position and swap me into the ruck. I want to be renowned throughout the league as an underachiever just like BEEG

Once you get your 1st hit out you will be hooked. You'll be obsessed with hit outs.

You'll never want to play anywhere but Ruck.

 

[thewizardmelon]

On Hate's Sweet FA+, each player profile indicates where that player is ranked - in the history of the league - for a large range of statistics. Here is my page, for example (see the "League Rank" column):

View attachment 2294472

What I'd like to know is who has the best 'Sum of Ranks'. That is, the smallest cumulative number ranking across desired statistics like hitouts, kicks, marks, handballs, tackles, goals, and DT points. Let's take a look at some league favourites:

Tarkyn_24

• Hitouts: 65th
• Kicks: 3rd
• Marks: 45th
• Handballs: 35th
• Tackles: 6th
• Goals: 1st
• DT: 3rd
• Total: 158

TheInjuryFactory

• Hitouts: 454th
• Kicks: 92nd
• Marks: 303rd
• Handballs: 82nd
• Tackles: 16th
• Goals: 210th
• DT: 88th
• Total: 1,245

Mobbs

• Hitouts: 127th
• Kicks: 12th
• Marks: 2nd
• Handballs: 10th
• Tackles: 74th
• Goals: 90th
• DT: 15th
• Total: 330

serial_thrilla

• Hitouts: 300th
• Kicks: 216th
• Marks: 156th
• Handballs: 188th
• Tackles: 278th
• Goals: 525th
• DT: 221st
• Total: 1,884

So, so far, the order would be:

1. Tarkyn_24 (158)
2. Mobbs (330)
3. TheInjuryFactory (1,245)
4. serial_thrilla (1,884)

How about you, Sweet? Who can you think of who might top the sum of ranks? And how does your own career look?

Nice idea, but surely this just favours old heads - anyone newish to the league can just assume they are well down the pecking order.

Fun idea for all the oldies though! But not the newer additions to the league

 

[Headless]

Nice idea, but surely this just favours old heads - anyone newish to the league can just assume they are well down the pecking order.

Fun idea for all the oldies though! But not the newer additions to the league

True! An averages per games sum of ranks would be much better across the board in terms of comparable stats without longevity.

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

Ruin a name thread title with one letter.

 

[thewizardmelon]

Ruin a name thread title with one letter.

Sum of wanks? Sum of yanks? Sum of rants?

 

[thewizardmelon]

TheInjuryFactory you know I don’t like to hand you cheap compliments, but your name thread is genuinely the most I’ve enjoyed a media thread in 2-3 seasons.

I know it’s a re-hash, but it was well timed. Well done.

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

Sum of wanks? Sum of yanks? Sum of rants?

Bum of ranks

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

TheInjuryFactory you know I don’t like to hand you cheap compliments, but your name thread is genuinely the most I’ve enjoyed a media thread in 2-3 seasons.

I know it’s a re-hash, but it was well timed. Well done.

Cheers wiz

I'm sure it has been done a couple times over before, but I genuinely didn't realise it was a rehash, it just came to me one day for whatever reason and I actually thought it would get landfilled!

Media is weird. I always feel like it's a flip of a coin whether the community rates it or hates it!

 

[Headless]

Cheers wiz

I'm sure it has been done a couple times over before, but I genuinely didn't realise it was a rehash, it just came to me one day for whatever reason and I actually thought it would get landfilled!

Media is weird. I always feel like it's a flip of a coin whether the community rates it or hates it!

"RATE IT OR HATE IT?"



What was that thread you did where you were ranting media threads?

 

[Gralin]

Hmmm, we're almost there. But those with multiple premierships and All-SFA selections need to be penalised somehow.

Surely the weight of the awards is penalty enough

 

[TheInjuryFactory]

"RATE IT OR HATE IT?"



What was that thread you did where you were ranting media threads?

Think that was KP actually.

 

[Headless]

Think that was KP actually.

You're very easy to conflate, Cloud_ - and I've always said that.

 

[thewizardmelon]

Cheers wiz

I'm sure it has been done a couple times over before, but I genuinely didn't realise it was a rehash, it just came to me one day for whatever reason and I actually thought it would get landfilled!

Media is weird. I always feel like it's a flip of a coin whether the community rates it or hates it!

Oh maybe its not a re-hash here in the SFA per say, moreso the idea of change a letter from "insert player/team/item".

Media sure is weird. Someone tried to post a toast to Headless today - that's definitely not a media idea that has occurred in the SFA before, is it Less?

 

[Headless]

Oh maybe its not a re-hash here in the SFA per say, moreso the idea of change a letter from "insert player/team/item".

Media sure is weird. Someone tried to post a toast to Headless today - that's definitely not a media idea that has occurred in the SFA before, is it Less?

nahnah might have done it once or thrice.

 

[thewizardmelon]

nahnah might have done it once or thrice.

Do you mean yahnah?

Wait, wrong thread.