- Joined
- Sep 19, 2004
- Posts
- 22,432
- Reaction score
- 20,451
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Yep, spot on. Also, murphy's opponent runs off him all day and exposes his lack of pace/mobility, whereas Taz almost never gets exposed by his opponent running off him.Tarrant and Murphy play very different roles which are dependent on their abilities. Tarrant runs all day and takes marks, and works well beyond the 50m line. Murphy, when he plays well, is a lead and mark FF. Outside of that role he seems lost. I thought Tarrant had a below par day yesterday (from the tv screen perspective of course), but his stats look better than stats from almost any game Murphy has ever played, apart from that he didn't kick any goals. Murphy rarely touches the ball. It begs the question;
What would you rather;
a) Tarrant getting lots of the ball despite his innaccuracy in shooting for goal, but still contributing as he did today?
or
b) Murphy having laser accuracy, but no/few possessions as he has done when in the team?
I would much rather they find a way of utilising Tarrant's undoubted talents. Either Murphy or Campbell could slot into the closer to goal role, and we also have a heap of others who can play the third tall forward including Drum, resting ruckmen, Johnson, Mundy, Headland, Thronton etc. At this stage I would have as much faith in any of them contributing as much as Murphy does out of the goal square, and more than he does away from it.





