Analysis The Adelaide Crows Stats Thread

[Mattrox]

I haven't read the real paper in ages. Pleasantly surprised by the game stats table.

What struck me was our team had more green.... 30% above season average rankings and out performing in KPIs. And A lot of Freo players had red, 30% below season average. We brought our A game in a lot of areas.

Areas of concern.... They took 12 intercept marks. Our disposal eff...... possibly impacted heavily by missing set shots at goal.

 

[Deaneus!]

DE of all players ranked largest to smallest -------------------------------- DE of all players with greater than 17 possessions (av poss 16)

 

[Danoz]

Not sure if we want or need this, but seeing as I'm the self proclaimed Statman, I decided to do it anyway. I'll update our stats every week.

Some interesting team stats;

• Added score ratio per i50

Crows Stats| Total| Average| Rank| Compare To Mean| Compare To Opp| Opp Total| Opp Average
\Kicks| 1784| 223| 2| +17.9| +26| 1576| 197|
\Handballs| 1177| 147.1| 14| -10.8| -16.6| 1310| 163.8|
\Kick-Handball Ratio| 1.5| | 1| +0.2| +0.3| 1.2| |
\Disposals| 2961| 370.1| 8| +7.1| +9.4| 2886| 360.8|
\Cont Poss| 1120| 140| 4| +1.4| +6| 1072| 134|
\Uncont Poss| 1813| 226.6| 9| +3.5| +5.3| 1771| 221.4|
\Disp eff %| 71%| | 15| -1.7| +0.1| 70.9%| |
\Clangers| 392| 49| 14| +1.7| +2.9| 369| 46.1|
\Marks| 804| 100.5| 3| +12.6| +15.8| 678| 84.8|
\Cont marks| 77| 9.6| 11| -0.2| -1.5| 89| 11.1|
\Marks50| 110| 13.8| 3| +3.3| +2.9| 87| 10.9|
\Hit-outs| 330| 41.3| 11| -0.4| -2.5| 350| 43.8|
\Clearances| 342| 42.8| 2| +3.9| +9.4| 267| 33.4|
\Centre clr| 114| 14.3| 3| +1.8| +2| 98| 12.3|
\Stoppages| 228| 28.5| 4| +2.2| +7.4| 169| 21.1|
\Rebound50| 280| 35| 13| -3.6| -2.3| 298| 37.3|
\Frees For| 130| 16.3| 18| -3.1| -0.3| 132| 16.5|
\Frees Agst| 132| 16.5| 2| -2.8| +0.3| 130| 16.3|
\Tackles| 519| 64.9| 10| +0.3| -0.4| 522| 65.3|
\One %s| 313| 39.1| 14| -5| -3.8| 343| 42.9|
\Bounces| 63| 7.9| 10| -0.9| -3.3| 89| 11.1|
\Inside50| 450| 56.3| 3| +4.7| +8.3| 384| 48|
\Goals| 116| 14.5| 3| +2.1| +2.3| 98| 12.3|
\Behinds| 95| 11.9| 5| +0.6| +2.4| 76| 9.5|
\Total Score| 791| 98.9| 3| +13.1| +15.9| 664| 83|
\Rushed Behinds| 21| 2.6|
\Goal assists| 84| 10.5| 3| +1.9| +3.1| 59| 7.4|
\Goal acc %| 55%| | 5| +2.6| -1.3| 56.3%| |
\Goal acc % excl rushed| 61.1%|
\Score ratio per i50| 46.9%| | 10| +0.95| +1.58| 45.3%| |
\Interchanges| 866| 108.3| 10| +2.5| | | |

Some interesting player stats;

Rank| Kicks |#| Handballs |#| Disposals |#| Cont Poss |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |110| Scott Thompson |92| Patrick Dangerfield |193| Patrick Dangerfield |106|
\2| Matthew Jaensch |110| Rory Laird |91| Rory Laird |171| Scott Thompson |93|
\3| Tom Lynch |97| Patrick Dangerfield |83| Scott Thompson |167| Rory Sloane |73|
\4| Taylor Walker |97| Rory Sloane |66| David Mackay |145| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |66|
\5| Eddie Betts |90| Sam Jacobs |62| Tom Lynch |144| Rory Laird |62|
\6| Brodie Smith |84| David Mackay |62| Matthew Jaensch |142| Eddie Betts |56|
\7| David Mackay |83| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |55| Rory Sloane |137| Sam Jacobs |50|
\8| Rory Laird |80| Matthew Wright |50| Sam Jacobs |134| Richard Douglas |45|
\9| Ricky Henderson |79| Nathan Van Berlo |49| Taylor Walker |125| Brodie Smith |42|
\10| Richard Douglas |75| Tom Lynch |47| Brodie Smith |122| David Mackay |42

Rank| Uncont Poss |#| Disp eff % |#| Clangers |#| Marks |#
\1| Rory Laird |109| Kyle Cheney |86.9| Taylor Walker |33| Taylor Walker |66|
\2| Tom Lynch |106| Luke Brown |83.2| Patrick Dangerfield |25| Matthew Jaensch |57|
\3| Matthew Jaensch |97| Rory Laird |80.7| Rory Laird |21| Tom Lynch |56|
\4| David Mackay |95| Matthew Jaensch |79.3| Matthew Wright |21| Sam Jacobs |45|
\5| Patrick Dangerfield |88| Jake Kelly |78.9| Brodie Smith |19| Rory Laird |43|
\6| Taylor Walker |88| David Mackay |76.8| Charlie Cameron |19| Eddie Betts |36|
\7| Sam Jacobs |86| Jake Lever |75.7| Richard Douglas |18| Jake Kelly |35|
\8| Scott Thompson |79| Sam Jacobs |75.5| Matthew Jaensch |17| Kyle Cheney |35|
\9| Nathan Van Berlo |77| Mitch Grigg |75.1| Nathan Van Berlo |17| Daniel Talia |32|
\10| Ricky Henderson |76| Ricky Henderson |74.9| Rory Sloane |16| Rory Sloane |31

Rank| Cont marks |#| Marks50 |#| Hit-outs |#| Clearances |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |8| Taylor Walker |31| Sam Jacobs |278| Patrick Dangerfield |52|
\2| Taylor Walker |8| Eddie Betts |21| Josh Jenkins |30| Scott Thompson |48|
\3| Eddie Betts |7| Tom Lynch |14| Patrick Dangerfield |9| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |33|
\4| Sam Jacobs |6| Josh Jenkins |10| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |8| Rory Sloane |28|
\5| Kyle Cheney |6| Charlie Cameron |9| Tom Lynch |2| Richard Douglas |25|
\6| Tom Lynch |5| Patrick Dangerfield |7| Rory Sloane |1| Sam Jacobs |18|
\7| Rory Laird |5| Matthew Wright |4| Richard Douglas |1| Matthew Wright |17|
\8| Brodie Smith |4| Rory Sloane |3| Nathan Van Berlo |1| Matt Crouch |15|
\9| Matthew Jaensch |4| Sam Jacobs |2| || Nathan Van Berlo |13|
\10| Nathan Van Berlo |4| Mitch Grigg |2| || Eddie Betts |13

Rank| Centre clr |#| Stoppages |#| Rebound50 |#| Frees For |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |28| Scott Thompson |26| Matthew Jaensch |24| Scott Thompson |11|
\2| Scott Thompson |22| Patrick Dangerfield |24| David Mackay |24| Patrick Dangerfield |10|
\3| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |13| Rory Sloane |22| Rory Laird |20| Rory Laird |9|
\4| Richard Douglas |9| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |20| Ricky Henderson |19| Rory Sloane |8|
\5| Eddie Betts |8| Richard Douglas |16| Kyle Cheney |19| Sam Jacobs |8|
\6| Sam Jacobs |7| Matthew Wright |14| Luke Brown |17| Kyle Cheney |7|
\7| Jarryd Lyons |7| Nathan Van Berlo |13| Brodie Smith |15| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |6|
\8| Rory Sloane |6| Sam Jacobs |11| Nathan Van Berlo |13| Taylor Walker |6|
\9| Matt Crouch |6| Brodie Smith |10| Daniel Talia |12| Eddie Betts |6|
\10| Matthew Wright |3| Ricky Henderson |10| Sam Jacobs |11| Luke Brown |6

Rank| Frees Agst |#| Tackles |#| One %s |#| Bounces |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |11| Patrick Dangerfield |50| Daniel Talia |44| Brodie Smith |9|
\2| Taylor Walker |10| Nathan Van Berlo |36| Sam Jacobs |25| Rory Sloane |8|
\3| Rory Laird |9| David Mackay |32| Kyle Cheney |20| Matthew Jaensch |7|
\4| Scott Thompson |9| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |30| Ricky Henderson |16| David Mackay |7|
\5| Matthew Wright |8| Scott Thompson |30| Rory Laird |16| Eddie Betts |6|
\6| Rory Sloane |7| Richard Douglas |28| Jake Kelly |16| Ricky Henderson |3|
\7| Richard Douglas |7| Rory Sloane |27| Luke Brown |16| Tom Lynch |3|
\8| Brodie Smith |6| Eddie Betts |27| Matthew Jaensch |15| Charlie Cameron |3|
\9| Jake Kelly |6| Jake Kelly |23| Kyle Hartigan |14| Patrick Dangerfield |2|
\10| Charlie Cameron |6| Charlie Cameron |19| Rory Sloane |13| Rory Laird |2

Rank| Inside50 |#| Goals |#| Behinds |#| Goal assists |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |37| Eddie Betts |29| Taylor Walker |12| Tom Lynch |10|
\2| Brodie Smith |33| Taylor Walker |25| Eddie Betts |9| Eddie Betts |9|
\3| Tom Lynch |32| Tom Lynch |12| Charlie Cameron |9| Taylor Walker |8|
\4| Taylor Walker |29| Patrick Dangerfield |10| Patrick Dangerfield |8| Matthew Wright |7|
\5| Eddie Betts |28| Josh Jenkins |10| Tom Lynch |8| Brodie Smith |5|
\6| Scott Thompson |25| Charlie Cameron |7| Brodie Smith |5| Richard Douglas |5|
\7| Ricky Henderson |24| Scott Thompson |4| Josh Jenkins |4| Nathan Van Berlo |5|
\8| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |24| Rory Sloane |3| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |3| Rory Sloane |4|
\9| Matthew Wright |23| Brodie Smith |3| Nathan Van Berlo |3| Patrick Dangerfield |4|
\10| Richard Douglas |21| Mitch Grigg |3| Rory Sloane |2| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |4

Rank| Goal acc % |#| Time On Ground % |#| AFL Fantasy |#| Exie |#
\1| Richard Douglas |100| Kyle Hartigan |99.5| Patrick Dangerfield |828| Patrick Dangerfield |971|
\2| Ricky Henderson |100| Daniel Talia |96.6| Sam Jacobs |825| Sam Jacobs |945|
\3| Scott Thompson |100| Kyle Cheney |96.2| Eddie Betts |727| Taylor Walker |926|
\4| Luke Brown |100| Jake Lever |95.3| Taylor Walker |719| Eddie Betts |894|
\5| Eddie Betts |76.3| Taylor Walker |94.9| Tom Lynch |694| Tom Lynch |854|
\6| Mitch Grigg |75| Eddie Betts |91.9| Matthew Jaensch |624| Matthew Jaensch |764|
\7| Josh Jenkins |71.4| Sam Jacobs |88.3| Rory Laird |608| Rory Laird |731|
\8| Taylor Walker |67.6| Tom Lynch |88.3| David Mackay |590| David Mackay |692|
\9| Sam Jacobs |66.7| Jake Kelly |86.3| Scott Thompson |585| Scott Thompson |675|
\10| Rory Sloane |60| Josh Jenkins |85.3| Rory Sloane |554| Rory Sloane |664

UPDATED POST RD 8

Quoted for truth

 

[Danoz]

Some interesting player stats;

• Thommo ranked 4th and Danger 5th for contested possessions/game
• Danger ranked 5th in the AFL for tackles.
• Ten goal Tom out-assisting Eddie Extraordinary with 11 compared to 9.
• I noticed that the goal accuracy given on AFL.com.au includes non scoring shots on goal. I'm trying to work out how to get this data into the tables. Hopefully tomorrow.

Some interesting player stats;

• Thommo ranked 4th and Danger 5th for contested possessions/game
• Danger ranked 5th in the AFL for tackles.
• Ten goal Tom out-assisting Eddie Extraordinary with 11 compared to 9.
• I noticed that the goal accuracy given on AFL.com.au includes non scoring shots on goal. I'm trying to work out how to get this data into the tables. Hopefully tomorrow.

Updated post rd 9

 

[baldandbroke]

Adelaide
Average Age 24y 177d total games 1704
11 players under 50 games
6 players under 20 games

Freo
Average Age 26y 346d total games 2877
2 players under 50 games
0 players under 20 games

http://afltables.com/afl/stats/games/2015/010820150530.html

Literally 2 years behind them in development !! This is a huge part of why Freo are contesting, and we are not close yet.

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Areas of concern.... They took 12 intercept marks. Our disposal eff...... possibly impacted heavily by missing set shots at goal.

Actually they took 18 intercept marks

 

[Doctor B]

View attachment 139835 View attachment 139836
DE of all players ranked largest to smallest -------------------------------- DE of all players with greater than 17 possessions (av poss 16)

Lever is very impressive

 

[The19thMan]

I haven't read the real paper in ages. Pleasantly surprised by the game stats table.

What struck me was our team had more green.... 30% above season average rankings and out performing in KPIs. And A lot of Freo players had red, 30% below season average. We brought our A game in a lot of areas.

Areas of concern.... They took 12 intercept marks. Our disposal eff...... possibly impacted heavily by missing set shots at goal.
View attachment 139825

Actual score vs Expected score hurts

 

[baldandbroke]

So, after Round 9 ....



The upset columns show who is kind of in the wrong position on the ladder compared with their results ... Collingwood / Richmond look over-rated by their ladder position AND Port / Geelong look under rated.

For the following rankings I do a little calculation comparing their average rank of who each tea is playing / has played with the average of all the other teams. This gives a bit of relevance to each teams ranking (ie if you are 1st the average rank of the other teams is 10, whereas the 18th ranked team means the other teams average rank is 9)

Who has had the easiest run compared to their ladder position so far?

Up to R9
Collingwood 1 easiest
Richmond 2
Brisbane 3
West Coast 4
Hawthorn 5
St Kilda 6
GWS Giants 7
Adelaide 8
Gold Coast 9
Sydney 10
Essendon 11
Fremantle 12
Carlton 13
North Melbourne 14
Geelong 15
Port Adelaide 16
Melbourne 17
Western Bulldogs 18 toughest

Seems strange but check out the two ends of the ladder:
Collingwood (4th on the ladder) have played - 7,8,10,12,13,14,16,18,17 (avg = 12.778)
Western Bulldogs (9th on the ladder) have played - 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,14,15 (avg = 6.778)

For the record AFC are 7th on the ladder and have played - 1,4,5,9,11,13,14,15,17 (avg 9.889)

So who gets the best run coming home compared to ladder position?

Remainder of season
Port Adelaide 1 easiest
Western Bulldogs 2
GWS Giants 3
Melbourne 4
Geelong 5
Adelaide 6
Fremantle 7
Brisbane 8
Sydney 9
Carlton 10
Hawthorn 11
North Melbourne 12
Gold Coast 13
Collingwood 14
Essendon 15
West Coast 16
St Kilda 17
Richmond 18 toughest

The season long numbers are starting to show the folly in trying to manipulate the draw based on the prior year results!

Season
Brisbane 1 easiest
GWS Giants 2
Collingwood 3
Port Adelaide 4
Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 6
Sydney 7
Geelong 8
Fremantle 9
West Coast 10
Richmond 11
Western Bulldogs 12
Melbourne 13
Carlton 14
Gold Coast 15
St Kilda 16
Essendon 17
North Melbourne 18 toughest

Remember this is a snap shot that changes after every round - the bigger the swings in the ladder the more it changes everything ... so it makes more sense after the bye.

But - the same things are showing up.

Clubs with upside - Port, Bulldogs, GWS
Clubs with downside - Richmond, West Coast, Collingwood

AFC are sitting about right at this stage

 

[Danoz]

So, after Round 8 ....

View attachment 140375

The upset columns show who is kind of in the wrong position on the ladder compared with their results ... Collingwood / Richmond look over-rated by their ladder position AND Port / Geelong look under rated.

Who has had the easiest run compared to their ladder position so far?

Up to R8
Collingwood 1 easiest
Richmond 2
Brisbane 3
West Coast 4
Hawthorn 5
St Kilda 6
GWS Giants 7
Adelaide 8
Gold Coast 9
Sydney 10
Essendon 11
Fremantle 12
Carlton 13
North Melbourne 14
Geelong 15
Port Adelaide 16
Melbourne 17
Western Bulldogs 18 toughest

Seems strange but check out the two ends of the ladder:
Collingwood (4th on the ladder) have played - 7,8,10,12,13,14,16,18,17 (avg = 14.375)
Western Bulldogs (9th on the ladder) have played - 1,2,3,5,6,7,8,14,15 (avg = 7.625)

For the record AFC are 7th on the ladder and have played - 1,4,5,9,11,13,14,15,17 (avg 11.125)

So who gets the best run coming home compared to ladder position?

Remainder of season
Port Adelaide 1 easiest
Western Bulldogs 2
GWS Giants 3
Melbourne 4
Geelong 5
Adelaide 6
Fremantle 7
Brisbane 8
Sydney 9
Carlton 10
Hawthorn 11
North Melbourne 12
Gold Coast 13
Collingwood 14
Essendon 15
West Coast 16
St Kilda 17
Richmond 18 toughest

The season long numbers are starting to show the folly in trying to manipulate the draw based on the prior year results!

Season
Brisbane 1 easiest
GWS Giants 2
Collingwood 3
Port Adelaide 4
Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 6
Sydney 7
Geelong 8
Fremantle 9
West Coast 10
Richmond 11
Western Bulldogs 12
Melbourne 13
Carlton 14
Gold Coast 15
St Kilda 16
Essendon 17
North Melbourne 18 toughest

Remember this is a snap shot that changes after every round - the bigger the swings in the ladder the more it changes everything ... so it makes more sense after the bye.

But - the same things are showing up.

Clubs with upside - Port, Bulldogs, GWS
Clubs with downside - Richmond, West Coast, Collingwood

AFC are sitting about right at this stage

That is spectacular stuff OOTC. You should send it in to the AFL inquirer and try to get some royalties.

 

[baldandbroke]

Small moves make big changes to this chart Games that may have been upsets before swing around to being expected when a few ladder positions change.



The greyed out are the highs and lows, which are only slightly different to the rankings below (which take into account where each team is currently on the ladder). Again the upsets show teams that are maybe out of place on the current ladder.

Up to r10
Collingwood 1 easiest
West Coast 2
Brisbane 3
Richmond 4
Hawthorn 5
GWS Giants 6
Adelaide 7
St Kilda 8
Sydney 9
Essendon 10
Gold Coast 11
Carlton 12
Fremantle 13
Geelong 14
Port Adelaide 15
North Melbourne 16
Melbourne 17
Western Bulldogs 18 hardest

Can see a few standouts above - Collingwood and West Coast had an easy run so far - Hawks not as high as you would expect considering the easy-ish draw so far - WB have played their toughest games already and are positioned better than their current ladder #.

And for the remainder of the season ...

From r10 onwards
Western Bulldogs 1 easiest
Melbourne 2
North Melbourne 3
Brisbane 4
Fremantle 5
Port Adelaide 6
GWS Giants 7
Gold Coast 8
Adelaide 9
Carlton 10
Sydney 11
Geelong 12
Hawthorn 13
Essendon 14
Richmond 15
West Coast 16
Collingwood 17
St Kilda 18 hardest

WB get some reprieve and should bounce back in the second half, as North could do - Richmond / Collingwood / West Coast will be tested to see if they are pretenders or not.

And just for the laugh of it, the season ranks based on the current ladder - always fun to look at at the end of the season to see who got the gift draw and who got reamed !!!

For the season overall
Brisbane 1 easiest
GWS Giants 2
Collingwood 3
Western Bulldogs 4
Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 6
Melbourne 7
North Melbourne 8
Sydney 9
West Coast 10
Richmond 11
Fremantle 12
Gold Coast 13
Port Adelaide 14
St Kilda 15
Carlton 16
Essendon 17
Geelong 18 hardest

 

[The19thMan]

Small moves make big changes to this chart Games that may have been upsets before swing around to being expected when a few ladder positions change.

View attachment 142055

The greyed out are the highs and lows, which are only slightly different to the rankings below (which take into account where each team is currently on the ladder). Again the upsets show teams that are maybe out of place on the current ladder.

Up to r10
Collingwood 1 easiest
West Coast 2
Brisbane 3
Richmond 4
Hawthorn 5
GWS Giants 6
Adelaide 7
St Kilda 8
Sydney 9
Essendon 10
Gold Coast 11
Carlton 12
Fremantle 13
Geelong 14
Port Adelaide 15
North Melbourne 16
Melbourne 17
Western Bulldogs 18 hardest

Can see a few standouts above - Collingwood and West Coast had an easy run so far - Hawks not as high as you would expect considering the easy-ish draw so far - WB have played their toughest games already and are positioned better than their current ladder #.

And for the remainder of the season ...

From r10 onwards
Western Bulldogs 1 easiest
Melbourne 2
North Melbourne 3
Brisbane 4
Fremantle 5
Port Adelaide 6
GWS Giants 7
Gold Coast 8
Adelaide 9
Carlton 10
Sydney 11
Geelong 12
Hawthorn 13
Essendon 14
Richmond 15
West Coast 16
Collingwood 17
St Kilda 18 hardest

WB get some reprieve and should bounce back in the second half, as North could do - Richmond / Collingwood / West Coast will be tested to see if they are pretenders or not.

And just for the laugh of it, the season ranks based on the current ladder - always fun to look at at the end of the season to see who got the gift draw and who got reamed !!!

For the season overall
Brisbane 1 easiest
GWS Giants 2
Collingwood 3
Western Bulldogs 4
Adelaide 5
Hawthorn 6
Melbourne 7
North Melbourne 8
Sydney 9
West Coast 10
Richmond 11
Fremantle 12
Gold Coast 13
Port Adelaide 14
St Kilda 15
Carlton 16
Essendon 17
Geelong 18 hardest

Port moved from 4th easiest draw to 5 hardest draw in 1 round, wow.

Great analysis though!

 

[baldandbroke]

Port moved from 4th easiest draw to 5 hardest draw in 1 round, wow.

Great analysis though!

Yep - as the teams settle into their proper ladder positions - lots of the old stats get switched on their heads

In my brief experience looking at these numbers it only really shows up the outliers this early in the season ... like Collingwood, West Coast, North and the Bulldogs for instance.

Bulldogs have only played Saints and Demons ranked in the bottom 8.
North have played Essendon, Geelong, Port and Brisbane in the bottom 8. (Geelong and Port are probably under-ranked a bit as they have had the 3rd and 4th toughest draw so far)
West Coast have only played GWS and Freo ranked in the top 8 (both at home)
Collingwood have only played Adelaide and Richmond ranked in the top 8. (both at home)

I would say that Collingwood / West Coast are currently over-ranked and Western Bulldogs / North under-ranked.

With 2 wins separating 3rd and 12th, I reckon a few big moves are on the cards for the second half of the season.

 

[Danoz]

Not sure if we want or need this, but seeing as I'm the self proclaimed Statman, I decided to do it anyway. I'll update our stats every week.

Some interesting team stats;

• Score ratio per i50 improved compared to our opponents due to Saturday, but behinds don't win us games.
• We are ranked 10th for 1%ers so far (spoils, shepherds). This is something I think we need to improve on.

Crows Stats| Total| Average| Rank| Compare To Mean| Compare To Opp| Opp Total| Opp Average
\Kicks| 2022| 224.7| 2| +19.6| +26.9| 1780| 197.8|
\Handballs| 1305| 145| 15| -13| -15.8| 1447| 160.8|
\Kick-Handball Ratio| 1.5| | 1| +0.3| +0.3| 1.2| |
\Disposals| 3327| 369.7| 8| +6.6| +11.1| 3227| 358.6|
\Cont Poss| 1308| 145.3| 2| +6.9| +9.4| 1223| 135.9|
\Uncont Poss| 1985| 220.6| 12| -2.7| +3.7| 1952| 216.9|
\Disp eff %| 69.6%| | 17| -3| -1.1| 70.7%| |
\Clangers| 439| 48.8| 13| +1.6| +2.8| 414| 46|
\Marks| 871| 96.8| 4| +8.8| +14.3| 742| 82.4|
\Cont marks| 89| 9.9| 9| 0| -1.1| 99| 11|
\Marks50| 119| 13.2| 5| +2.6| +3| 92| 10.2|
\Hit-outs| 357| 39.7| 12| -2.1| -8.8| 436| 48.4|
\Clearances| 390| 43.3| 1| +4.5| +7.9| 319| 35.4|
\Centre clr| 124| 13.8| 3| +1.4| +2| 106| 11.8|
\Stoppages| 266| 29.6| 3| +3.2| +5.9| 213| 23.7|
\Rebound50| 326| 36.2| 13| -2.3| -1.7| 341| 37.9|
\Frees For| 150| 16.7| 17| -2.5| +0.6| 145| 16.1|
\Frees Agst| 145| 16.1| 2| -3| -0.6| 150| 16.7|
\Tackles| 607| 67.4| 9| +2.7| +1.4| 594| 66|
\One %s| 377| 41.9| 10| -2.1| -0.7| 383| 42.6|
\Bounces| 66| 7.3| 10| -1.4| -2.7| 90| 10|
\Inside50| 505| 56.1| 3| +4.6| +7.2| 440| 48.9|
\Goals| 123| 13.7| 5| +1.2| +1.7| 108| 12|
\Behinds| 110| 12.2| 3| +1| +3.2| 81| 9|
\Total Score| 848| 94.2| 5| +8.4| +20.4| 664| 73.8|
\Rushed Behinds| 23| 2.6|
\Goal assists| 87| 9.7| 4| +1| +2.3| 66| 7.3|
\Goal acc %| 52.8%| | 10| +0.3| -4.4| 57.1%| |
\Goal acc % excl rushed| 58.6%|
\Score ratio per i50| 46.1%| | 8| +0.16| +3.18| 43%| |
\Interchanges| 977| 108.6| 9| +2.7| | | |

Some interesting player stats;

• Thommo ranked 4th and Danger 5th for contested possessions/game
• Danger ranked 5th in the AFL for tackles.
• Ten goal Tom out-assisting Eddie Extraordinary with 11 compared to 9.
• I noticed that the goal accuracy given on AFL.com.au includes non scoring shots on goal. I'm trying to work out how to get this data into the tables. Hopefully tomorrow.

Rank| Kicks |#| Handballs |#| Disposals |#| Cont Poss |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |130| Rory Laird |102| Patrick Dangerfield |231| Patrick Dangerfield |135|
\2| Matthew Jaensch |110| Patrick Dangerfield |101| Rory Laird |198| Scott Thompson |105|
\3| Tom Lynch |110| Scott Thompson |99| Scott Thompson |187| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |81|
\4| Taylor Walker |109| David Mackay |70| Tom Lynch |162| Rory Laird |75|
\5| Eddie Betts |100| Rory Sloane |66| David Mackay |158| Rory Sloane |73|
\6| Rory Laird |96| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |65| Sam Jacobs |145| Eddie Betts |62|
\7| Scott Thompson |88| Sam Jacobs |65| Matthew Jaensch |142| Nathan Van Berlo |54|
\8| David Mackay |88| Matt Crouch |56| Nathan Van Berlo |142| Matthew Wright |54|
\9| Nathan Van Berlo |87| Nathan Van Berlo |55| Taylor Walker |140| Sam Jacobs |53|
\10| Brodie Smith |84| Matthew Wright |53| Rory Sloane |137| Tom Lynch |48

Rank| Uncont Poss |#| Disp eff % |#| Clangers |#| Marks |#
\1| Rory Laird |123| Kyle Cheney |84| Taylor Walker |33| Taylor Walker |72|
\2| Tom Lynch |115| Luke Brown |82.9| Patrick Dangerfield |29| Tom Lynch |60|
\3| David Mackay |103| Rory Laird |80.8| Matthew Wright |25| Matthew Jaensch |57|
\4| Patrick Dangerfield |99| Matthew Jaensch |79.3| Rory Laird |23| Sam Jacobs |47|
\5| Taylor Walker |98| Jake Kelly |78.3| Nathan Van Berlo |22| Rory Laird |46|
\6| Matthew Jaensch |97| Jake Lever |77.4| Scott Thompson |20| Eddie Betts |39|
\7| Sam Jacobs |92| David Mackay |75.1| Brodie Smith |19| Kyle Cheney |38|
\8| Nathan Van Berlo |88| Ricky Henderson |74.9| Tom Lynch |19| Nathan Van Berlo |36|
\9| Scott Thompson |87| Sam Jacobs |74.1| Charlie Cameron |19| Jake Kelly |35|
\10| Ricky Henderson |76| Daniel Talia |73.4| Richard Douglas |18| Daniel Talia |33

Rank| Cont marks |#| Marks50 |#| Hit-outs |#| Clearances |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |11| Taylor Walker |33| Sam Jacobs |300| Patrick Dangerfield |61|
\2| Taylor Walker |8| Eddie Betts |22| Josh Jenkins |33| Scott Thompson |57|
\3| Eddie Betts |8| Tom Lynch |14| Patrick Dangerfield |10| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |36|
\4| Kyle Cheney |7| Josh Jenkins |12| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |9| Rory Sloane |28|
\5| Sam Jacobs |6| Charlie Cameron |9| Tom Lynch |2| Richard Douglas |25|
\6| Tom Lynch |6| Patrick Dangerfield |8| Rory Sloane |1| Matthew Wright |21|
\7| Rory Laird |6| Matthew Wright |4| Richard Douglas |1| Sam Jacobs |19|
\8| Brodie Smith |4| Rory Sloane |3| Nathan Van Berlo |1| Nathan Van Berlo |16|
\9| Matthew Jaensch |4| Sam Jacobs |2| || Matt Crouch |16|
\10| Nathan Van Berlo |4| Nathan Van Berlo |2| || Eddie Betts |14

Rank| Centre clr |#| Stoppages |#| Rebound50 |#| Frees For |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |30| Scott Thompson |32| Rory Laird |25| Patrick Dangerfield |15|
\2| Scott Thompson |25| Patrick Dangerfield |31| David Mackay |25| Scott Thompson |12|
\3| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |13| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |23| Matthew Jaensch |24| Rory Laird |10|
\4| Richard Douglas |9| Rory Sloane |22| Kyle Cheney |23| Kyle Cheney |10|
\5| Eddie Betts |9| Matthew Wright |17| Nathan Van Berlo |20| Rory Sloane |8|
\6| Sam Jacobs |7| Richard Douglas |16| Ricky Henderson |19| Sam Jacobs |8|
\7| Jarryd Lyons |7| Nathan Van Berlo |16| Luke Brown |19| Eddie Betts |8|
\8| Rory Sloane |6| Sam Jacobs |12| Daniel Talia |16| Taylor Walker |7|
\9| Matt Crouch |6| Rory Laird |11| Brodie Smith |15| Luke Brown |7|
\10| Matthew Wright |4| David Mackay |11| Matthew Wright |12| Matthew Wright |7

Rank| Frees Agst |#| Tackles |#| One %s |#| Bounces |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |13| Patrick Dangerfield |58| Daniel Talia |52| Brodie Smith |9|
\2| Rory Laird |10| Scott Thompson |44| Kyle Cheney |36| Rory Sloane |8|
\3| Scott Thompson |10| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |39| Sam Jacobs |30| Matthew Jaensch |7|
\4| Taylor Walker |10| Nathan Van Berlo |39| Jake Kelly |21| David Mackay |7|
\5| Matthew Wright |10| David Mackay |37| Patrick Dangerfield |17| Eddie Betts |6|
\6| Rory Sloane |7| Eddie Betts |29| Rory Laird |17| Charlie Cameron |4|
\7| Richard Douglas |7| Richard Douglas |28| Luke Brown |17| Mitch Grigg |4|
\8| Brodie Smith |6| Rory Sloane |27| Ricky Henderson |16| Ricky Henderson |3|
\9| Jake Kelly |6| Jake Kelly |26| Matthew Jaensch |15| Tom Lynch |3|
\10| Charlie Cameron |6| Rory Laird |25| Jake Lever |15| Patrick Dangerfield |2

Rank| Inside50 |#| Goals |#| Behinds |#| Goal assists |#
\1| Patrick Dangerfield |43| Eddie Betts |31| Taylor Walker |15| Tom Lynch |11|
\2| Tom Lynch |37| Taylor Walker |25| Charlie Cameron |12| Eddie Betts |9|
\3| Taylor Walker |36| Tom Lynch |13| Eddie Betts |10| Taylor Walker |8|
\4| Brodie Smith |33| Patrick Dangerfield |11| Patrick Dangerfield |9| Matthew Wright |7|
\5| Eddie Betts |31| Josh Jenkins |11| Tom Lynch |8| Brodie Smith |5|
\6| Scott Thompson |28| Charlie Cameron |8| Brodie Smith |5| Richard Douglas |5|
\7| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |26| Scott Thompson |4| Nathan Van Berlo |5| Nathan Van Berlo |5|
\8| Ricky Henderson |24| Rory Sloane |3| Josh Jenkins |5| Rory Sloane |4|
\9| Matthew Wright |23| Brodie Smith |3| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |3| Patrick Dangerfield |4|
\10| Sam Jacobs |22| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |3| Rory Sloane |2| Cam Ellis-Yolmen |4

Rank| Goal acc % |#| Time On Ground % |#| AFL Fantasy |#| Exie |#
\1| Richard Douglas |100| Kyle Hartigan |99.5| Patrick Dangerfield |975| Patrick Dangerfield |1143|
\2| Ricky Henderson |100| Kyle Cheney |96.7| Sam Jacobs |888| Taylor Walker |1023|
\3| Scott Thompson |100| Daniel Talia |95.6| Taylor Walker |799| Sam Jacobs |1015|
\4| Luke Brown |100| Jake Lever |94.8| Eddie Betts |795| Eddie Betts |976|
\5| Eddie Betts |75.6| Taylor Walker |94.4| Tom Lynch |766| Tom Lynch |939|
\6| Mitch Grigg |75| Eddie Betts |91.1| Rory Laird |717| Rory Laird |856|
\7| Josh Jenkins |68.8| Sam Jacobs |88.7| Scott Thompson |701| Scott Thompson |813|
\8| Sam Jacobs |66.7| Tom Lynch |87.9| David Mackay |644| Matthew Jaensch |764|
\9| Taylor Walker |62.5| Josh Jenkins |86| Nathan Van Berlo |636| Nathan Van Berlo |758|
\10| Tom Lynch |61.9| Jake Kelly |85.4| Matthew Jaensch |624| David Mackay |753

UPDATED POST RD 9

Quoted for truth

 

[Danoz]

Some interesting team stats;

• Added goal ratio per i50. We're ranked 11th for conversion, though ahead of the curve due to outliers Suns and Bombers. We're also going at worse than our direct opponents. Our defence appears to be suffering from lack of midfield pressure to me.
• Our DE has fallen below our direct opponent comparison for the first time this season. Stats reflect something we've all seen as obvious.

Some interesting player stats;

• Danger ranked 3rd and Thommo 5th for contested possessions/game
• Danger ranked equal 3rd in the AFL for tackles.
• Ten goal Tom out-assisting Eddie Extraordinary with 11 compared to 9.
• Goal accuracy has been updated to include non-scoring shots on goal. Eddie's accuracy drops from over 75% to just over 50%. Other notable goal accuracies include Tex 40%, Danger 40%, Charlie 24%, Wright 17%.

UPDATED POST RD 10

 

[Elite Crow]

http://m.afc.com.au/news/2015-06-10/midseason-afl-statistics

Interesting, Danger registers in the top 10 for lots of key stats. Slow start but in some very good form, some might even consider him a top 10 player in the league.
Brown conceding 0.6 goals against his opponent.
Laird also doing very well.

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Brown conceding 0.6 goals against his opponent.

That's interesting given some of the comments on here

 

[Elite Crow]

That's interesting given some of the comments on here

That's a bloody unbelievable effort really. Given how dangerous small forwards are, to basically concede a goal a every two games is huge.

 

[Deaneus!]

All those high numbers and then BAM!!! we're second to bottom for disposal efficiency.

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

All those high numbers and then BAM!!! we're second to bottom for disposal efficiency.

But what scope for improvement!

Imagine how good our forward line will be when we start hitting the barn.

Just adding Douglas and Henderson for Wright and van Berlo would improve our footskills significantly.

 

[headache1]

That's interesting given some of the comments on here

Hopefully a few people questioning their eyes now.

Though I imagine it will go more like "Am I so out of touch? No, it's Champion Data who are wrong".

 

[mistylake]

All those high numbers and then BAM!!! we're second to bottom for disposal efficiency.

So what does that mean for our ladder position? Could be one or two wins better off if we had better disposal. I'd say if we started games better we would play with more confidence and probably have a natural improvement of that DE (5/10%) without even changing any personnel.
Would make a considerable difference.

 

[Bacon8]

But what scope for improvement!

Imagine how good our forward line will be when we start hitting the barn.

Just adding Douglas and Henderson for Wright and van Berlo would improve our footskills significantly.

Douglas at 67.9% is an improvement on VB's 67.5% for the season, but not significant.

In the same games (so R1-R5), Douglas is 67.9% for 112 disp and VB was 74.2% for 66 - so Douglas had 36 ineffective touches to VB's 17.

Yep, significant.

 

[mcday]

Since we kick so much won't our disposal efficiency likely always be lower than average? Is there a separate kicking efficiency stat somewhere?

 

[Danoz]

Since we kick so much won't our disposal efficiency likely always be lower than average? Is there a separate kicking efficiency stat somewhere?

Not available publicly, but I'd love to see that. Most teams have better DE because they handball more, and I agree with you, seeing what our KE and HE is compared to other teams would be more informative.

PW did say in his AA interview that apparently Champion_Data has us as the second-highest team for missing a target under no pressure. Clearly not good enough.