Play the arguments and facts, not the man.
I've given you something like 5 hard core left journalists I religiously follow.
I know I'm right because on this issue they are in heated agreement with the journalists on the right I follow.
That's the only way I can think to corroborate things without doing all the research myself (and it still requires a fair bit).
Infowars is like one of those drones that gets sent to outer space. There is sh*t all over the place and there is a lot of information which is difficult to process. The information is something you tend to appreciate retrospectively because most of what is reported is correct. Whether it is responsible journalism I cant say because I dont know what their sources are.
You post some facts, not just narratives and I'll respond to them.
A drone sent to space only comes back with facts. It doesn't speculate about them or produce narratives. Just pictures and measurements.
That's the opposite of infowars. You can tell it's not responsible journalism because they themselves said explicitly in a court that it's not journalism and shouldn't be believed. When your source is telling everyone that it's not a credible source, that should be enough, no?