There is no doubt...

[Kaan]

lol del potro beating hewitt in his peak

a 28 year old hewitt beat del potro in straight sets last year at wimbledon

(in a year which he made the QF, SF, lost in R2 to hewitt and then won us open)

but anyway no matter what anyone says you have a reply ready. even a brainwash wont stop you from sucking nadals dick.

 

[Dipper]

You make it sound like Novak Djokovic is a scrub. Novak is a heck of a player, and it took his best tennis to beat Federer who really, didn't play anywhere near what he is capable of.

I take your point, what I was saying was that he couldn't beat ND this time despite appearing primed before the tournament began.

To win more GS titles, especially with the way that his ranking is heading south, the chances are that he will have to beat the likes of ND (or perhaps Murray) and Nadal to win them and I don't really think he's got it in him.

 

[Total Power]

Roddick would have at least 7 slams to his name if he didn't have possibly the greatest player of all time on the other side of the net at his peak. He had one of the best serves the game has ever seen and a brutal forehand that could crack winners back then. It's ridiculous to talk about him like he was rubbish.

i am not sure if you have a brain or you choose not to use it? the same example u have given..listen up..Nole lost to roger in the last 3 US open semis, he could have had 4 grandslams by now and you roddick is better than him????he is only 23 and will improve from here.He has beaten Roddick at new York too.If it wasnt for an exceptional Nadal, he could have won the US open this year too. I really cant believe i read the shit that you type.We are in an era where we are seeing probably 2 tennis players make history and you are comparing it to the last generation is really laughable..but carry on.

 

[Total Power]

lol del potro beating hewitt in his peak

a 28 year old hewitt beat del potro in straight sets last year at wimbledon

(in a year which he made the QF, SF, lost in R2 to hewitt and then won us open)

but anyway no matter what anyone says you have a reply ready. even a brainwash wont stop you from sucking nadals dick.

delpotro cant play on grass.He admitted that.He said he is working on his game on grass.I am sure you think Gilles Muller is better than Nadal on grass since he has beaten Nadal at wimbledon. So rafa is infinitely better than roger since he is 10-2 on clay?? delpo on grass is not a benchmark

Secondly i also said "peak" if you missed that point.The guy is 21 and has been injured, give him a break.Also take your petty insults somewhere else just because you cant keep up with the argument.In your opinion im sure Hewitt is also better than roger on grass this year.

 

[NERDY]

Yeah roddick had 1 good year, i give you that.But look at his h2h against federer, its embarassing.Hewitt was one heck of a player like Chang and suffered the same fate Chang did.He had no weapons and got burned out.He would have been no match in front of Federer or Nadal back in 2001 anyway.

Even if you dont take federer or nadal into consideration, please tell me you dont believe that a peak Del Potro or Djokovic will not be able to beat a roddick or a hewitt at their peak as well?? del potro at his peak is capable of destroying everyone and he is not a mental case like safin

Roddick had three top years. 2003, 2004 (finished the year No. 2) and 2005 (finished the year No. 3). He also should have beaten Federer in the 2004 Wimbledon Final and also the 2009 Wimbledon Final. Roddick has been a fantastic player through his career, just doesn't have the Masters or Grand Slams wins to show it. But from 2001-10 he's won over 70% of his matches in every year, and over 80% in 2004 and 2005.

As for your other point, it's a very tough one. Let's not forget before Roger Federer won his first 2-3 Grand Slams, Hewitt had a healthy winning record against him. It was only as Federer elevated his game to a level nobody apart from Nadal could match that his record against Hewitt and also David Nalbandian for that matter started to improve. I think it's too tough to call choosing between Hewitt/Safin/Roddick or Del Potro/Djokovic/Murray. Will probably have to wait another couple of years for a proper answer.

 

[Total Power]

Roddick had three top years. 2003, 2004 (finished the year No. 2) and 2005 (finished the year No. 3). He also should have beaten Federer in the 2004 Wimbledon Final and also the 2009 Wimbledon Final. Roddick has been a fantastic player through his career, just doesn't have the Masters or Grand Slams wins to show it. But from 2001-10 he's won over 70% of his matches in every year, and over 80% in 2004 and 2005.

He is the same as Andy Murray, the only difference is he won a slam, i am sure Muzza will win one too..but i dont see anything extraordinary in roddick or murray even

 

[Caesar]

How many of these threads do we need?

On the front page there are 4 Rafa wankfests, one Federer thread full of Rafa fanboys trolling Federer fanboys, and three Rafa vs Federer threads. A lot for a fairly quiet forum.

This forum is basically unreadable these days, mainly thanks to Total Power infecting every topic with his love of Nadal and dislike of Federer. There's a Nadal appreciation thread, and a Rafa vs Federer catch all thread - can't this perpetual drivel be kept there?

 

[Total Power]

so u think its better to have no posts at all? here is an advice, dont read if you dont like it.This is a free country and you are not a mod.

 

[Caesar]

This message is hidden because Total Power is on your ignore list.

'tis bliss. Unfortunately he still drags otherwise good threads offtopic by posting his inane rubbish for people to respond to.

 

[Total Power]

and yet you had to respond classic

 

[Power King]

I still think murray is federer's bitch in grand slams.

 

[NERDY]

He is the same as Andy Murray, the only difference is he won a slam, i am sure Muzza will win one too..but i dont see anything extraordinary in roddick or murray even

Go back to 2003 and watch how Andy Roddick played, then watch him now. The difference is quite significant. Now his serve is still one of the top five in the Men's game, but it used to be on a par with Roger Federer. His backhand and net play was quite weak in 2003, whereas now they're both consistent without being anything fantastic. The big difference in his game is the forehand, it used to be a weapon and a shot that Andy would punish players with. Now he's lucky to hit more than 5-10 clean forehand winners per game. That's the biggest difference for mine in Andy Roddick, he doesn't have the confidence to go toe-to-toe with the top players. The Roddick of now is very similar to the Andy Murray of now, but the Andy Roddick of 2003 is very different.

 

[Total Power]

Go back to 2003 and watch how Andy Roddick played, then watch him now. The difference is quite significant. Now his serve is still one of the top five in the Men's game, but it used to be on a par with Roger Federer. His backhand and net play was quite weak in 2003, whereas now they're both consistent without being anything fantastic. The big difference in his game is the forehand, it used to be a weapon and a shot that Andy would punish players with. Now he's lucky to hit more than 5-10 clean forehand winners per game. That's the biggest difference for mine in Andy Roddick, he doesn't have the confidence to go toe-to-toe with the top players. The Roddick of now is very similar to the Andy Murray of now, but the Andy Roddick of 2003 is very different.

There is not much to disagree with that, good post