Tigers v Bombers Thread

[sante]

Richmond - 3.0.18
Essendon - 1.0.6


4 mins gone

RFC: Richo 2 goals & Simmonds 1 goal
EFC: Monfries a goal

Perfect conditions prevail at Morwell for the beginning of today's practice match between Essendon and Richmond ... or should that be practice mis-match. The Tigers are near full strength while Essendon is missing 16 first stringers. It is basically a reserves' team tackling the likes of Kane Johnson, Matthew Richardson, Nathan Brown, Troy Simmonds and Wayne Campbell.


So let's put this match in persepctive immediately. Essendon is not expected to win but it will be an important day for its young players. The success of the day will not be dependant on the scoreboard, rather the performance of Essendon first, second and third year players. We will keep you posted! With so many senior players missing it was second-year Bomber Matthew Allan who tossed the coin. Richmond will kick with the aid of the breeze in the first quarter.

 

[blackcat]

How are you getting this info Sante?

 

[sante]

2 Bomber sites


http://www.bomberblitz.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=17042


and

go to www.essendonfc.com.au

 

[rota69]

thats preety good for essendon to do that i thank them

 

[sante]

18 mins gone


RICH - 6.2.38
ESS - 2.2.14

ESSENDON: Angus Monfries, Ben Haynes
RICHMOND: Matthew Richardson 2, Troy Simmonds, Kayne Pettifer, Mark Chaffey, Rodan

 

[rota69]

quater time

richmond 8.5 54
essendon 2.2 14

richmond goals richo 2 pettifer 2 simmonds chaffy rodan brown
essndon monfries haynes

 

[sante]

so we have 22 out there??

we are doing well even though they are undermanned

 

[blackcat]

Who is missing from the dons line up? Could someone list them for me.

 

[sante]

Who is missing from the dons line up? Could someone list them for me.

16 of them i will guess them

1. Hird
2. Lloyd
3. Fletcher
4. Lucas
5. Johnson
6. Johnson
7. Solomon
8. McPhee
9. Murphy
10. Peverill
11. Ramanauskas
12. McVeigh

that is all i can think of

 

[sante]

63 to 14



ESSENDON: Angus Monfries, Ben Haynes
RICHMOND: Matthew Richardson 2, Kayne Pettifer 2, Troy Simmonds 2, Nathan Brown, Mark Chaffey, David Rodan,

 

[Croat tiger]

Half Time Tigers By 48 Woohoooo!!!!!

 

[sante]

Krakouer goals...61 point lead

 

[Sealen]

16 of them i will guess them

1. Hird
2. Lloyd
3. Fletcher
4. Lucas
5. Johnson
6. Johnson
7. Solomon
8. McPhee
9. Murphy
10. Peverill
11. Ramanauskas
12. McVeigh

that is all i can think of

Wow. With all those players missing, its hard to make anything of this practise match. 100 has to be the minimum acceptable win.

 

[jezza]

Looking like it, 103 - 28.

 

[sante]

115 to 34 now

 

[oxx]

At least go to a fellow Rcihmond board for updates.


http://oneeyed-richmond.com/forum/index.php?topic=1376.from1109394594;topicseen#msg15313

 

[Thrice3]

Essendon : 34
Richmond : 121
Essendon blow, im not taking much out of this game considering 14 of their 04 starting 22 aren't playing.
Good for the youth to be getting a game, good to see Pettifer in the thick of it.
and LMAO @ how predictable the Essendon supporters are gonna be after the 100pt belting they get, i can smell it now "ohh we had no good players playing", err.. i think we've got more kids playing that seniors on our list, i think.

 

[oxx]

We wouldnt expect them to cite any other reason caster -lol.

Fair enuff i guess.

Im happy with the margin being 100 over a team of kids considering half of our
team is just that-kids.

 

[Thrice3]

ahahah even if it is a prac match, im gonna stick it up all those ignorant bombers supporters.

 

[oxx]

 

[sante]

yeh give em ********

 

[Bentleigh]

Wow. With all those players missing, its hard to make anything of this practise match. 100 has to be the minimum acceptable win.

We only won by 12 odd goals.

Worring signs?

 

[sante]

We only won by 12 odd goals.

Worring signs?

12 goals is heaps - we were missing: Bowden, Schulz, Staff, Cogs and more


we had more kids than seniors in the team

 

[smasha]

12 goals is heaps - we were missing: Bowden, Schulz, Staff, Cogs and more


we had more kids than seniors in the team

Well there you go -we had an undermanned team too.

 

[oxx]

We still faded in the last qtr,not a good fukken sign against a team of young duds,

TW-Get onto that !