- Joined
- Feb 2, 2008
- Posts
- 819
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- South Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Liverpool LA Lakers 49ers LA Kings
Hille didn't start to become decent until he was 25, Laycock is 24.
From a purely rucking perspective, Hille is overrated and from an ability point of view, Laycock is superior to Hille. Hille struggles to get off the ground, Laycock has a decent leap.
You're also forgetting that Hille had shown gradual improvement whereas Laycock hadn't shown any before he was injured.
7 years at the club is long enough for such a lazy footballer. He even has admitted that what he reads about himself in the press affects him. If he's anywhere near this thread, it will only cause him more angst. Needs to join Johns in the WAFL is he is to have any chance of returning as a decent footballer.
I'l prefer not to have another Somervlle on our hands.





